M. 🧚🏽‍♀️

Roots: 🇬🇭 🇹🇬 ⭐️ ⭐️⭐️
Company (Instagram) @afromosaicsagency

[Cruise 👸🏽👸🏽 @dat_deltagirl]

Keep exposing them, I spoke about opposition using international influencers since a lot of Nigerian influencers are working for APC.

I’m glad we are gradually getting there🤭🤭

[sakinbiriyim @sakinbiriyim89]

her zaman derim muhendis oglani zehir olsa yut feci etkilendik

[David Hundeyin @DavidHundeyin]

I have a genuine question for my African followers who are honest enough to answer.

Have you ever seen your local Russian, Chinese, Iranian or North Korean embassy arrange meetings with your country's opposition leader? Did you ever see a Russian diplomat meet with Raila Odinga? Or a Chinese diplomat meet with Peter Obi? Or a North Korean diplomat discussing state affairs with Nelson Chamisa? Maybe an Iranian diplomat discussing "investment" with Issa Tchiroma?

Why is it always diplomatic missions from Western Europe, USA, Canada, Australia and New Zealand that pull this particular stunt? What is it about that specific demographic of diplomats that entitles them to blatantly interfere in their host country's local politics this way?

When was the last time you saw or heard from your local Russian or Chinese embassy? Do you even know the ambassadors' names? Yet why is your local US or UK ambassador almost a celebrity in your country? Why are they constantly roaming around poking their noses everywhere it doesn't concern them, and what gave them that right?

I really want you people to answer me.

[𝗔𝗟𝗘𝗫𝗔𝗡𝗗𝗘𝗥 @6ixxxboy]

@WindGodVonte This part sent me because this is the exact face I make when I want someone to stop talking to me 🤣

[M. 🧚🏽‍♀️ @Acnam]

@Braprynce @gyaigyimii How is the road in the neighbourhood ? And is it still for sale? If yes, how much?

[Ty’Rea 💙 @princessreaaaa]

OH MY GOD???????????

[Hubert Tieku Esq @KwesiHubert]

A lot of grounds work needed to be done before the full implementation of the TraffiTech

[Farida Bemba Nabourema @Farida_N]

This is what happens when historical ignorance is accompanied by an astonishing degree of intellectual arrogance.

First, there were no “West African countries” during the transatlantic slave trade. The region comprised kingdoms, empires, city-states and independent societies. Applying modern national identities to centuries-old history is an extraordinary display of ignorance.

Second, Europeans did not arrive in Africa as benevolent abolitionists. For centuries, they financed, institutionalised and industrialised human trafficking, supplying weapons that fuelled wars and slave raids, creating an enormous market for human captives, and codifying racial slavery into their laws. African collaborators existed, but their complicity does not absolve the European empires that sustained this monstrous commerce.

Entire African communities were devastated, populations displaced, villages destroyed and societies destabilised. Millions were deported across the Atlantic, while countless others suffered captivity, violence and death on African soil. Africa was itself a vast crime scene, not merely the departure point of enslaved people.

And perhaps the most remarkable historical fraud is how European nations have managed to present themselves as the liberators of the very people they spent centuries enslaving.

I grew up in a former French colony in Africa being taught from primary school that slavery was abolished by a Frenchman named Victor Schœlcher. It was only in 2026 ( yes this year ) that I discovered that people in former British colonies had been taught a remarkably similar story, except that their white saviour was an Englishman named William Wilberforce.

Yet long before Britain abolished slavery in its colonies in 1833, enslaved Africans in Haiti had fought a revolution, defeated European armies and proclaimed their independence in 1804. Toussaint Louverture and Jean-Jacques Dessalines were central to that struggle.

In 1816, Haitian President Alexandre Pétion supplied Simón Bolívar with weapons, ammunition and military assistance to support South America’s liberation struggles, on the condition that he advance the emancipation of enslaved people. And he went on to free more than half a dozen Latin American countries.

And what was Haiti’s reward for daring to liberate itself? Diplomatic isolation and, in 1825, a crushing indemnity of 150 million francs imposed by France, effectively forcing formerly enslaved people to compensate the descendants of their enslavers for the loss of their supposed property.

Meanwhile, Britain compensated slave owners with £20 million following abolition, while the enslaved received nothing.

Where are these stories in the European narratives of abolition? Where are Nat Turner, who led an enslaved uprising in Virginia in 1831, Queen Nzinga, who resisted Portuguese expansion and slave raiding in Central Africa, or the countless African rulers, communities and freedom fighters who resisted enslavement?

Black people fought for their freedom. They rebelled, resisted, organised, sacrificed and died for it. Their liberation was never simply a gift bestowed upon them by benevolent Europeans.

There is something profoundly tragic about descendants of enslaved Africans, born and educated in the lands of their ancestors’ enslavers, regurgitating sanitised colonial history, seemingly incapable of distinguishing historical scholarship from imperial propaganda.

The greatest triumph of colonial indoctrination is when the descendants of its victims become the most zealous defenders of its mythology.

What a pity!

[Kushz @Kushz75]

I absolutely love Shepards Pie - this is the British version, the original version.

[Weffrey Jellington @jeffwellz]

Just want to remind everybody that Ghana is a very poor country. Most people are doing the best they can in the moment.

[Sam Okudzeto Ablakwa @S_OkudzetoAblak]

It has been a really successful Russia-Africa Summit.

In direct talks with President Vladimir Putin, President John Mahama has secured the following concrete commitments:

1) Russia has agreed to work with Ghana to establish a 2,000 megawatts nuclear power plant to guarantee energy security and anchor industrialization. This is a revival of Osagyefo Kwame Nkrumah’s vision for which he commenced preparatory works but was truncated by the coup of February 28, 1966;

2) A new defence pact to acquire strategic military assets for the globally respected Ghana Armed Forces;

3) Ghana and Russia will enhance our agricultural cooperation aimed at boosting grain production and provision of fertilizers;

4) Russia will increase scholarships for Ghanaian students. Ghana now ranks second as the African nation with the most number of students;

5) Following concerns raised by President Mahama, President Putin has declared that Ghanaians are no longer allowed to participate in the war with Ukraine. This policy applies to all circumstances whether through irregular recruitments or expression of voluntary interests;

6) Ghana and Russia will revive our PJCC with Moscow ready to host in the next few weeks.

Ghana and Russia have maintained cordial and mutually beneficial formal bilateral relations since 1958.

For God and Country 🇬🇭 🙏🏾

[Farida Bemba Nabourema @Farida_N]

Kemi, congratulations on leading a major British party as a Black Woman. It takes real talent to rise to where you are and deceit is what it takes to rise as a Black leader in a western Conservative Party.
It is a pity the climb did not leave room for a history book and since you chose to argue in the language of history, let us do the history. Let’s dissect your verbal diarrhea point by point.

Everyone participated." Slavery existed on every continent. So did war, and nobody calls a village feud the World War. The transatlantic trade ran for 366 years (1501 to 1866) and put about 12.5 million Africans on ships, of whom about 1.8 million died before they saw the Americas, according to the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade Database. It ran through joint-stock companies, chartered monopolies, Lloyd's underwriters and acts of Parliament. It was hereditary, because the law made the child of an enslaved mother property from birth. It was racial, because a whole continent was defined as chattel. No other system in history combined those features at that scale. Dissolving all of it into "people from every continent" is far worse than intellectual dishonesty.

Britain was a market leader, not a participant. British ships carried about 3.2 million Africans, second only to Portugal and Brazil. The Treaty of Utrecht (1713) gave Britain the asiento, a thirty-year monopoly to supply 4,800 enslaved Africans a year to Spanish America. The Royal African Company, chartered in 1672 and headed by the Duke of York, later James II, branded its captives "DY". During Edward Colston's years in its leadership it shipped about 84,000 people, and roughly 19,000 died on the way.

You say British taxpayers should not answer for what happened before they were born. They did. In 1833 Britain borrowed £20 million to compensate slaveholders, and taxpayers serviced that loan until 2015, including the descendants of the enslaved. So the principle you invoke was not applied when the cheque went to slaveholders. It only appears when the cheque changes direction.

"Navel-gazing" is a curious charge from someone whose party spends more energy on the past (Empire nostalgia, culture war crusades) than most of those you accuse. Defend Britain if you must. But do not use your Nigerian name as the permission slip for arguments Nigerians know better than anyone.

[M. 🧚🏽‍♀️ @Acnam]

Is this a joke?

[Kemi Badenoch @KemiBadenoch]

Slavery was an evil in which people from every continent and region participated. We should be honest about the whole history, not select the parts that are politically convenient today, especially given Britain's leading role in ending the transatlantic slave trade.

If Caribbean countries are asking Britain for a formal apology for Britain’s role in the transatlantic slave trade, will they also be asking the same of the descendants of African kingdoms, rulers and merchants who captured, sold and profited from the trade?

On demands for reparations, whether through cash or debt relief, we have been down this track before. Twenty-five years ago, Jubilee 2000, Drop the Debt and Make Poverty History argued that cancelling the debts of poorer countries would give them a fresh start. More than $100 billion of debt was eventually written off, but many of those countries have since built up even bigger debts. Labour are already spending too much on Britain's welfare state, now is not the time for Andy Burnham to be providing global welfare.

There is no reason British taxpayers today should be held financially responsible for things that happened generations before any of us were born. And I have even less patience for political elites in commonwealth countries who don’t know how to make their own citizens prosperous now looking for another opportunity to blame Britain.

As Prime Minister, Andy Burnham should be Britain’s greatest defender. Instead, he is writing articles saying we need to confront our history (as if we haven't done enough of that) and considering another formal historical apology. Tony Blair already expressed Britain’s deep sorrow and regret for our role in the slave trade nearly twenty years ago. There is no need to do so again.

This is all another navel-gazing distraction. The Commonwealth should be looking forward, not endlessly backwards. That means economic partnerships to make us all richer and deeper military and security cooperation against common threats. If every Commonwealth summit becomes an exercise in presenting Britain with demands for cash then we need to start asking if it is worth the effort.

[Wisdom Kaye @modsiwW]

Halloween in High Fashion: Horror Movies Edition

[Daario Naharis ❤️💡⚡️ @rashbaey]

This is exactly what racial profiling looks like… he was so irritated! And listen to the narration in the clip! SMH

[Cowboy Journalist @UmaruSanda]

Dear IGP,

[Hakeem757 @ImOverIt757]

@KillaKreww Her saying this while dressed up as a white woman is CRAAZZZY

[M. 🧚🏽‍♀️ @Acnam]

@Tinibob20 @bammybae_ Colonialism in a nutshell.

[VOLTA / OTI YOUTH @ForVolta]

Our GEN Z's can't be fooled anymore

The parents should be proud of her

[Bisi of Adire_trends @_akande_bisi]

2 Timothy 4:3-4 NIV (New International Version)

For the time will come when people will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear. They will turn their ears away from the truth and turn aside to myths.

THEIR OWN DESIRES !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!