Andy's Thoughts

Light blue touch paper and retire.....

[Sharron Davies HoL MBE @sharrond62]

I find all of this just so insulting. Not one other group of people would be allowed to be ridiculed, parodied or mocked in this way. But it’s ok because it’s just ..women. More often than not they also use a vile & repugnant play on abusive words for women’s anatomy as their names.

[Róisín Michaux @RoisinMichaux]

On 9 March I submitted a request to see all emails relating to the termination of my freelance contract with the European Commission (I was working on an IT project).

I was told it was not a public-access (FOI) issue but at GDPR one. I said ok whatever, can I have the documents. Back and forth, back and forth, back and forth.

The data protection officer office emails me, today 17 June: we just received your request and we have to reply within one month.

DG HR and DG GROW GDPR people have been responding to me (and asking for details) for 3 months and 10 days, telling me they were working on it.

If I asked the wrong people initially (DG GROW access to documents), nobody told me.

I wonder what they are concocting. Was I fired for setting up the EU SEEN Network for staff members worried about queer activism in the workplace and in EU law? Or was I fired because I have a Substack and Twitter account where I talk shit about transvestitism in the workplace? Or did the @EU_Commission believe the activists at @ILGAEurope and @IGLYO who were telling people that I was paid by Viktor Orban to be gender critical (lol - the only possible explanation)?

Whatever the case, it wasn't my job performance. No warning, no notice period, and fabricated problems in a panicked email. My contract had only recently been renewed and I had been told by my manager that they were very happy with my work.

I'll be going into the details of what happened (that I know of) on the WDI Feminist Question Time webinar tomorrow at 5PM CET. See @DeclarationOn for the link. I think it's for women-only because they're radfems but the recording will be online afterwards.

[Right over Left Everytime @RightSide_Uk]

Maggie Oliver calls out Islam as the common factor in grooming gangs. She has seen nationalities that are not Pakistani men in these gangs - many Afghani, Iranian or Iraqi - but they are still all Muslim. Starmer’s Britain protects these Muslim monsters while our daughters are raped and trafficked for decades. The traitor regime covers up the religious and cultural motivation behind these crimes to protect the invaders. Sack every last politician and police chief who enabled this horror. Deport every last one of these beasts and their networks. Restore Britain as a safe homeland where our children are protected from Islamic grooming gangs. No more denial. No more betrayal. Fight back now. 🇬🇧
(video courtesy of @Britains_rights)

[James Dueck🇻🇦 @JamesDueck]

The Left: “Believe all women!”

British girls: “Here’s what happened to 250,000 of us.”

The Left:

[Andy's Thoughts @AcsThoughts]

@HeidiBachram @ArchbishopSarah @novaexhibition Wow, didn't see that coming.

[Andy's Thoughts @AcsThoughts]

@KiszelyPhilip "Stupidity" & "insanity" is correct but only explains the shallow belief that all is needed is change. Stamer's impotent to deliver policies the public want due to vocal opposition from radical party members. When Burnham ploughs on with the left agenda the penny will surely drop

[Dr Philip Kiszely @KiszelyPhilip]

Burnham will become prime minister and the usual suspects will cheer as the ‘grown-up’ enters the Downing Street room.

Then, in Groundhog Day Britain, Prime Minister Andy (for f*ck’s sake!) will prove himself the biggest car crash since the last one — No-Idea Keir.

We’ll waltz through the same chaos, witness the same two-tier travesty, and watch the same attack on our freedoms; only this time it’ll be more savage, more intense, and far more relentless. It will take us that much nearer the brink — if not beyond it.

Stupidity in short order.

It’s difficult not to feel creeping despair at the mind-boggling insanity of the Labour voter, the Green loon, the Lib Dem, and the divide across the right.

The latter, I suppose, poses little or no threat after last night. Even so…

We live in a sectarian society. Identity politics on all sides will ensure our economy grinds to a halt while we wage a tribal warfare that obliterates our future.

It’s the inevitable result of 30 years’ insanity, of course:
• open borders
• asymmetric multiculturalism
• race obsession
• unchecked Islamism
• the queering of everything
• liberal self-loathing

Those responsible should stand trial and do hard time.

But we should be responsible too - and stop the rot through the vote. It’s our last chance. The alternative is unthinkable.

[Dr. Maalouf ‏ @realMaalouf]

Not a single woman or child. Only military-age men.

That’s because they are not refugees. They are soldiers, and this is a religious war of conquest.

Europe needs to wake up.

[Graham Linehan @Glinner]

Wow what a lunatic

[Lilith Grey @LilithGMarshell]

The line "attack on trans rights" is kinda ropey too.

I mean yes, men and women have rights. But when the law states sex = man or woman. This means trans haven't lost any rights unless they're being prevent from going into a trans prison...

The fact JM is supposed to be a lawyer makes this just wild. There is no legal "right" for a biological male to be housed in a female prison.
This has zero to do with trans persecution rather than it being yet another, much needed correction.

[For Women Scotland @ForWomenScot]

Jolly M repeats the line currently bandied about on Reddit - where was the representation of trans people?

Here's the thing. Scottish Trans, Stonewall, LGBTYS etc were perfectly entitled to intervene if they so wished. They didn't. That isn't our fault or the fault of the court.

[Frank Stephens @justrightFrank]

I am trying to make people aware of the innocent British lives that have been lost due to our open borders.
This was Alice, aged just 14, raped to death, weighted down and thrown into a river.
It dates back to a time when immigrants arrived by the coachload, because we were in the EU.
This one arrived when Blair was PM.
He had already done time for the murder of his wife but even when he was arrested in the UK in 2009, no one checked his record, so he was never sent home.
The judge put Alice's death down as "unlawful killing" and also said that the victims death was not the fault of the police or Home Office, despite the fact that her killer should have been deported in 2009 under Blair.
I guess no one wanted this poor child on the "murdered list".
Maybe that is why she is not as well known as other murder victims?
We should never let anyone forget Alice, especially the ones who caused her death.
https://t.co/E29oeNQgJH

[Peter Clack @PeterDClack]

The mainstream media and scientific bodies chose to ignore a climate declaration, signed by over 1,100 (and later, even more) scientists.

The 'World Climate Declaration' was published in September, 2019, by CLINTEL (Climate Intelligence), a Netherlands-based group. It argued there is no climate crisis or emergency and criticised overreliance on worst-case scenarios based on computer modelling.

The declaration pointed to empirical data of biomass expansion, noting that 'CO2 is plant food'—a reality now backed by verified NASA satellite data showing significant global greening over recent decades. They emphasised the biological benefits of CO2 for global greening, and argued that climate policies must respect economic realities and national sovereignty.

However, critics of this paper were more focussed on who signed it, saying only a small percentage were publishing climate scientists or paleoclimatologists. Many were engineers, geologists, or professionals from unrelated fields.

This was a collision between an entrenched, centrally coordinated climate machine and a bloc of independent professionals, drawn from engineering, economic and industrial backgrounds, arguing the practical, physical constraints and costs of such an all-encompassing global energy transition.

The declaration said climate models had serious flaws. But the climate campaigners were on a roll, and said they alone represented mainstream science. They had built a body of evidence on the calibrated data of satellite and ocean temperatures. The 'short-term pain of transitioning to net zero was preferable to the long-term instability and economic damage from uncontrolled climate change.

This posture allowed them to freely portray the 'rate of warming' as unprecedented in modern human history. The mainstream media backed them. The declaration was labeled 'fringe' overnight by major academic journals.

The economic fallout from dismantling the global energy infrastructure has in fact been colossal, now estimated at $275 trillion and counting. The 1,100 strong declaration did not break through into this entrenched policy circle because of its institutional barriers to outsiders. These doors were permanently closed.

The UN, major central banks and Western governments were already colluding clandestinely with each other, plus global asset managers like BlackRock and Vanguard. They owned the science. They owned the carbon cash fallout. Now they owned the sovereignty as well.

The climate narrative is high-stakes rhetoric, slick propaganda that downplays the gradual collapse of western economies, once based on cheap coal, oil and gas. This mainstream narrative is what captured the public's attention with its high-stakes rhetoric, bypassing the need for a professionally structured, data-driven approach that would be much harder for independent critics to dismiss.

The campaign was spearheaded by claims of 'global boiling' - 'code red for humanity' rhetoric filled the news pages and dominated politicised shouting matches. The UN and associated bodies shifted their position from 'advisory' scientific panels to becoming the world's global economic managers.

The conversation wasn't about atmospheric physics. It was about rusted-on, centralised, top-down control and ownership. But when policies move faster than engineering realities, like grid stability and battery storage limits, then economic hardship becomesss the inevitable price.

That is exactly how it has turned out.

[Dr. Poppy Daniels @drpoppyBHRT]

As an expert in women's health with degrees in biology & medicine who treat women as my actual job, I will inform you that being a woman is a combination of chromosomes, external & internal sex characteristics & the CAPACITY but not the NECESSITY to menstruate, gestate & lactate. Women born without a uterus are a biological anomaly, not a variation of normal biology. Women who had a hysterectomy are still women. Women who have menstrual abnormalities, including absence of periods, infertility, & problems breastfeeding are still women. Saying a man who thinks he's a woman & is deluding himself that he's having "period pains" is the same as those biological women is patently false.

[David Collier @mishtal]

@savechildrenuk Organizations like this have been completely captured and no public money should be used to support them until they have been liberated and are back doing what they are meant to be doing.

Because I am sure lying and support for terrorist narratives wasn't part of the deal.

[Sex Reality Bites @sexrealitybites]

A double standard of the worst kind.

When females say they need their own spaces away from males where they are vulnerable, they’re told, “Not all males are predators!” and expected to get over it and share. But when trans-identifying males say they feel unsafe around males in male washrooms, suddenly everyone agrees that males can be dangerous and that their fears are valid.

Apparently, concerns about male violence are irrational when females raise them, but legitimate when trans-identifying males do.

[Adam Sellers @YisraelChaiAdam]

@ArchRose90 Liberals when they hear the truth -

[Chris Rose @ArchRose90]

Thangam Debbonaire sits in the House of Lords. Here she is having an unhinged breakdown and excusing sexual assault from illegal migrants since “white men do it to.”

[Campaign Against Antisemitism @antisemitism]

This is the second time that a prosecution by the CPS of people who allegedly chanted “Khaybar Khaybar, ya yahud, Jaish Muhammad, sa yahud” has failed.

The chant translates as: ‘Jews, remember the battle of Khaybar, the army of Muhammad is returning.’ It refers to the massacre and expulsion of the Jews of Khaybar in 628 CE and is plainly a battle cry against Jews.

The chant is unmistakably threatening to Jewish people.

But a jury apparently disagreed.

Nothing, it seems, can possibly be construed as being threatening to Jewish people if it means someone might be held to account.

https://t.co/I3ENlgozjE

[Benny Polatseck @BPolatseck]

I just found more video of the October 8 celebration led by Mamdani-endorsed congressional candidate @DarializaforNY.

Speaker after speaker hailed Hamas for the killing, kidnapping, and rape of civilians in Israel.

This was NOT A PROTEST. This was an all-out celebration.