The Egyptians, Assyrians, Babylonians, Persians,Romans,Nazis and others - all have passed through history and vanished. And I an ancient Jew, stand stronge.
No matter what happens, they’re always blamed. Antisemitism is a very serious disease
Thank you so much for your powerful words and for supporting the most persecuted people in the world.
#Iran#Dubai#Gaza
No matter what happens, they’re always blamed. Antisemitism is a very serious disease
Thank you so much for your powerful words and for supporting the most persecuted people in the world.
#Iran#Dubai#Gaza
Happy New Year - Shana Tova to all of Israel and the Jewish people, and to everyone who loves Israel and the Jews. May this year be the year of our redemption - Geula .
@RationalSettler Thanks for the accurate message. England has always been antisemitic. The harm the English caused the Jews over generations will never be forgiven. And now the English are starting to get their punishment from their beloved Muslims.
A “Settler’s” Take on England’s Sanctions Against Jews
Britain has chosen a peculiar enemy. Not the Authority that pays stipends to murderers. Not the textbooks that teach children to hate Jews. Not the governments that torture their own critics, jail journalists, and treat the sale of land to a Jew as treason. London has decided that dates, avocados, and a few bottles of wine grown by Jews in Judea and Samaria are the crisis that requires a speech from the foreign secretary, the prime minister standing nearby, and a media tour to explain the courage of it all.
The boycott is being sold as law and as rescue of a two-state map. It is neither. It is a political performance aimed at a party conference and a by-election, dressed up as foreign policy. One British commentator put it plainly: the theater was written more for Holborn and St Pancras than for Haifa. The volume of produce at stake is small. Diplomats have even been telling other capitals not to treat the step as a rupture. Palestinian activists call it too little. Washington has barely shrugged. And still the statement was made, because Labour needed a louder line against Israel before Liverpool and before a seat it fears losing to the Greens.
That is not statesmanship. It is the oldest habit in British politics when domestic failure becomes uncomfortable: find the Jews and legislate against their presence in their own land.
The legal story London now recites would have surprised London’s own lawyers. In 1967 the Foreign Office’s legal adviser did not treat the armistice line as a sacred border. He wrote that Israel had a fair claim to adjustments beyond it, not merely as spoils of war. The line was a ceasefire, not a frontier of Jewish exile. Treating every Jewish home east of it as contraband rewrites that history and pretends an armistice is a verdict on who may live in Jerusalem’s Jewish Quarter, in Hebron, in the hills of Samaria.
Hebron should end the argument by itself. Jews lived there for generations beside the graves of the patriarchs. In 1929 they were massacred. In 1936 the British Mandate finished the work and emptied the city of its remaining Jews. Property was looted. The synagogue was wrecked. For thirty-one years the community was gone because it had been murdered and expelled. After 1967 Jews returned. Britain now treats that return as the offense. If massacre and expulsion can convert an ancient community into an “illegal” one, then terror has been rewarded and ethnic cleansing has been given a legal afterlife.
Jordan’s occupation from 1948 to 1967 did the same across Judea and Samaria: Jews were driven out, their holdings seized, and no compensation followed. When Israel took the land back in a war it did not start, the demand was not that stolen Jewish life be restored. The demand, then and now, is that Jews stay out. That is not international law. It is a rule written for one people.
The language that made this possible was built over decades. Disputed land became “occupied,” then “illegally occupied,” then a slogan so worn that politicians no longer ask what the Mandate actually said. Britain helped author that Mandate. It later carved Transjordan away. It now lectures the remnant on which side of an old ceasefire a Jew may farm. Israel’s public diplomacy let the vocabulary harden. The result is a public, including ministers, who believe a repetition is a fact.
E1 is the pretext of the week. London says a corridor that would keep Jerusalem tied to Maale Adumim would leave Palestinians with a strip too thin to live with. The same voices demand that Israel accept a waist of comparable width for millions of its own citizens. Narrowness is intolerable when it is theirs and required when it is ours. Construction decisions and planned roads that preserve travel between Palestinian towns were taken long before this announcement.
The claim that a twelve-kilometer stretch killed the two-state idea is theater. That idea was not murdered by housing. It was abandoned, again and again, by an Authority that chose incitement over reform, and by a diplomatic class that paid for the choice.
Europe already tried the other lever. It recognized a Palestinian state and waited for moderation, hostages, and an end to war. None arrived. The lesson drawn in London was not that empty recognition fails. The lesson was that Israel needed a “reset,” beginning with a ban on goods from Jewish towns. The foreign secretary found time to discuss the policy with Qatar. He did not find time to match the energy against pay-for-slay, against curricula that sanctify killing, against the absence of a Palestinian presidential vote since 2005, against corruption, against the silencing of the press. Those files produce no Commons statement and no supermarket ban.
The double standard is the policy. Britain funds and talks with an Authority whose own human-rights body records arbitrary arrest and torture. It watches personal-status laws that grind down women. It watches schools it helps underwrite teach martyrdom. It watches Hamas’s record in Gaza and still aims the economic weapon at Jewish farmers. Arabs already live as citizens inside Israel: voters, doctors, judges, property owners. The unaskable question is why a Jew may not live as a minority in any future Palestinian entity, and why a Palestinian who wishes to sell land to a Jew is treated as a traitor. A ban on Jewish produce answers that question without saying it: Jewish life east of the line is the problem to be managed.
The boycott will not do what its authors claim. It will not police crime. It will not conjure a diplomatic process that does not exist. It will not separate a lid made in one town from hummus packed in another. The economies are braided. Palestinian laborers work in those fields and plants. If the shelves in Britain go empty of that fruit, those workers lose wages first. Timing the move weeks before an Israeli election is not diplomacy. It is interference dressed as virtue, and it will be read inside Israel as proof that pressure from London is a reason to stand firmer, not to retreat.
There is a darker pattern as well. Economic isolation of Jews has never been a neutral tool. It has been the opening move of campaigns that begin with goods and end with people. When the punishment is detached from the stated goal, when only the Jewish state is treated this way, the historical warning is not hysteria.
I find this legislation despicable. I also notice something that matters more than Britain’s self-regard. For months too many Israelis and Jewish Zionists spent their energy on the inflated slander of “settler violence,” as if a sliver of criminality defined the hundreds of thousands of Jews raising children, teaching, farming, and building ordinary towns in Judea and Samaria. The slander was useful to people who needed a moral alibi for boycotts. It was never a description of those communities. Now, watching London put Jewish labor on a blacklist, many of those same voices have come back to the defense of our towns. That return is overdue. It should not have required a British edict.
Judea and Samaria are not a colonial nickname invented after 1967. They are the names of the Jewish heartland. Jews live there because the land is theirs by history, by law older than Labour’s press operation, and by the simple rule that a people is not required to stay expelled in order to please a foreign ministry. Britain may enjoy the applause in the hall. It will not decide who may plant a vineyard in Samaria or sell dates from the Jordan Valley. Those towns will remain. The Jews who built them will remain. The countries that confuse a grocery ban with justice will discover that they have measured themselves, not us.
🚨 Incredible scene out of Italy! 🇮🇹
Simone Caravella interrupted an Islamic prayer session in a Mestre park, sang the Italian national anthem, ate a meat sandwich, stomped on prayer mats, and told everyone to leave Italy - igniting a total frenzy.
Time to make this guy famous. Wake up
#Italy
« Juif que je vois, juif que je frappe ! »
Voilà ce que des milliers de jeunes Espagnols ont scandé hier aux abords du stade Bernabéu, à Madrid, en marge d’une mobilisation contre l’invasion migratoire à Ceuta.
Quel est le rapport entre les Juifs et ce qui s’est passé à Ceuta ?
Strictement aucun !
La haine du Juif a atteint un tel niveau dans l’Espagne dirigée par Pedro Sánchez que beaucoup n’hésitent plus à l’exprimer en toute impunité, peu importe le contexte.
À la fois effrayant et écœurant.
« Juif que je vois, juif que je frappe ! »
Voilà ce que des milliers de jeunes Espagnols ont scandé hier aux abords du stade Bernabéu, à Madrid, en marge d’une mobilisation contre l’invasion migratoire à Ceuta.
Quel est le rapport entre les Juifs et ce qui s’est passé à Ceuta ?
Strictement aucun !
La haine du Juif a atteint un tel niveau dans l’Espagne dirigée par Pedro Sánchez que beaucoup n’hésitent plus à l’exprimer en toute impunité, peu importe le contexte.
À la fois effrayant et écœurant.
« Juif que je vois, juif que je frappe ! »
Voilà ce que des milliers de jeunes Espagnols ont scandé hier aux abords du stade Bernabéu, à Madrid, en marge d’une mobilisation contre l’invasion migratoire à Ceuta.
Quel est le rapport entre les Juifs et ce qui s’est passé à Ceuta ?
Strictement aucun !
La haine du Juif a atteint un tel niveau dans l’Espagne dirigée par Pedro Sánchez que beaucoup n’hésitent plus à l’exprimer en toute impunité, peu importe le contexte.
À la fois effrayant et écœurant.
Enjoyed a cup of coffee this morning with Amishav Melet. He’s the guy who the residents of Tur Massiya tried to portray as a terrorist when all he was doing was driving a security patrol and bothering no one.
Amishav is a vegan, a pacifist and a farmer. He wants nothing more than to work the land promised to the Jewish people by God.
He says he harbors no hatred for the Palestinians, even though a Palestinian murdered his brother just six weeks ago.
The Jew-haters will need to get another poster child for their “settler violence” campaign. This one won’t work (neither will any other).
Enjoyed a cup of coffee this morning with Amishav Melet. He’s the guy who the residents of Tur Massiya tried to portray as a terrorist when all he was doing was driving a security patrol and bothering no one.
Amishav is a vegan, a pacifist and a farmer. He wants nothing more than to work the land promised to the Jewish people by God.
He says he harbors no hatred for the Palestinians, even though a Palestinian murdered his brother just six weeks ago.
The Jew-haters will need to get another poster child for their “settler violence” campaign. This one won’t work (neither will any other).
שמעו סיפור שיטריף לכם את המוח, אחד ההזיות:
בחור מתקשר אליי עכשיו,
נגנב לו רכב מהחנייה של רמי לוי באריאל.
אישתו, תוך כדי קניות, מקבלת שיחה מאיתורן שמישהו מתעסק לה עם הרכב.
היא מיד יוצאת מרמי לוי ומתקשרת למשטרה.
האזור כולו מרושת מצלמות!
לדברי השוטרים, הם רואים את הרכב עדיין בתוך אריאל, עוד רגע מגיע לש.ג. של אריאל,
תעצרו אותו! אומרת האישה,
"אי אפשר. אנחנו לא יכולים לסכן חיי אדם על גניבת רכב".
מה?
מהיציאה לאריאל, תוך פחות מדקה הרכב נכנס לכפר סלפית.
מצלצל לכם מוכר?
כןכן, זה הכפר שראש העיר של אריאל סגר אותו בתחילת המלחמה כדי למנוע מהערבים להגיע לתוך אריאל, אבל הצבא פתח אותו,
ראש העיר סגר שוב,
והצבא התעקש ובא ופתח שוב!
כשהאישה הגיעה להגיש תלונה,
השוטר אמר לה "את לא הראשונה היום",
הוא הסביר לה שכל יום נגנבים מהחניון של רמי לוי שם 5-6 רכבים.
"זאת חולייה" מסביר לה השוטר.
מה מה מה?!?!
מה????
1.למה לעזאזל אתם מאפשרים לדבר כזה לקרות?! למה אתם לא נכנסים לסלפית עם 100 חיילים ושוטרים, מתחילים לפרק תכפר עד שיוציאו את כל הרכבים?!
2.איך לעזאזל פלסטינאי מסלפית נכנס לתוך אריאל למתחם של רמי לוי, 5 פעמים ביום, כל יום?!?
איך?!?
אתם מבינים את המשמעות?
עכשיו נוח להם לקחת את הכסף של היהודים,
מחר הם יכנסו לשם ויניחו מטען רב עוצמה בתוך רמי לוי, או ירססו ברובים להנאתם ויקצרו עשרות אנשים,
מה קורה פה?!
איזה מערכת כושלת!
כולם!
הצבא שהתעקש "לשמור על מרקם החיים" של הנאצים בסלפית,
המשטרה שלא מעזה להתעמת עם ערבים ולהחזיר לאזרחים שלה את הרכבים הגנובים,
רצף פסיכי של מחדלים!
שתפו!
אולי מישהו יתעורר ויעזור לזוג היהודי להשיב את רכבם. יש מיקום, אפילו תמונה של המחבל שגנב את הרכב יש.
Number of Jews in Egypt: 10 (total population: 100 million)
Jordan: 0 (10M)
Saudi Arabia: 0 (34M)
Lebanon: 100 (7M)
Syria: 0 (17M)
Iraq: 4 (39M)
Iran: 8,300 (83M)
Number of Arabs in Israel: 1.9M (9M), with full civil rights.
But sure, Israel is the apartheid state.