@caro@notlarrysabato I agree but I just don’t think Twitter is the place to learn about life outside the blue bubble. I don’t believe that the right-wing Twitter army represents the majority of Trump voters. If it does, God help us.
@ianbremmer I didn’t prepare a speech—I never expected to win (wipes away a tear) I…I’ve got a little something caught in my eye…(touches hand to chest)…and my heart.
Please let this be true today:
“There was always just enough virtue in this Republic to save it; sometimes none to spare, but still enough to meet the emergency.” —William Seward, Secretary of State during the civil war.
if the nyt workers are able to successfully prevent the needle from being published it will be one of the greatest achievements for organized labor since the invention of the weekend
@arthurbrooks@brianstelter I would normally agree with this—and I want to. But I feel like we’re getting to the point where it’s like saying, “Whether you give Jews safe harbor or yell, ‘They’re in the attic’—remember that the ‘other side’ are our family, friends, and fellow Germans.’”
@ChrisCillizza If i want an informed, incisive opinion that illuminates an issue, I steer clear of you. But if I’m looking for a shitty, ice-cold hot take, you’re my guy.
@joshtpm I didn’t cancel my subscription lightly. But the preemptive capitulation to Trump by Bezos chilled me to the fucking bone. Now, I’ve got to figure how to cut my family loose of Amazon.
Agree. Similarly, I'm guessing that in 2016 @Comey didn't want Trump to win. But he--like the Times these days--loved the smell of moral rectitude rising from his own shit and wanted everyone else to breathe in a big, admiring whiff.
Many will disagree, but I do not think the Times wants Trump to win. Rather, their leadership wants to win at practicing what they see as neutrality and independence in journalism. This is their vision. To practice at a high level without joining a side. https://t.co/2w2TnA7Qrb