@RadekKar Moim zdaniem nie. To jedno z kluczowych narzędzi wpływania na głosy. Nie ma w nich nic obiektywnego w rozumieniu komunikacyjnym - nie badawczym.
In 1998, Andrew Wakefield published a study falsely linking the MMR vaccine to autism, sparking the anti-vaccine movement. The study was later retracted due to fraudulent data. This is a case study used at all top universities in the world. This caused huge damage on society level and was conducted on 12(!!) children….
@TheScottBywater@TheScottBywater that is an interesting angle to this POV. And how do u assess the assessors? I was originally assuming that this works in US similarly as in Poland, and majority of factcheckers are NGO, non corporately funded. Is it not?