@Globalstats11 "Didn't exist" as in what? You classify Russia as a country that Didn't exist 100 years ago because it was the USSR, but also not vlassify China as a country that didn't exist even though it was a bunch of split up states? Make it make sense.
@pesori85@sofiartworks No it did not 😭 what are you smoking? If you're referring to the Muhammadean Sharia, even then you're wrong. He was illiterate let alone a scholar of Christianity when the revelation first appeared.
@Raffzahn@AnglishWitsmoot@theanglishtimes That is besides our initial topic, whether Anglish ceases to exist has nothing to do with what Anglish is. You want to use Anglish while violating it's fundamental premise? that's contradictory.
@iinotprincess@squint_7mod@haiperexe Oh he did not leave because he "doesn't believe", it's to simply seek validation from a western "progressive" community, because he has a complex that makes him see his community as inferior. He's only doing this to please a people that he is not part of. that's self-hatred.
@Abou_Sita_Dicko@1_Q_X "Christ" يعني "المسيح" بالإنجليزية.. وش قاعد تخرط؟
"Christ"
من اللاتينية "CHRISTVS"
اللي يعود أصلها إلى الإسم الإغريقي
"Χρῑστός" (Khrīstós)
واللي هي نقل دلالي للإسم العبري
"מָשִׁיחַ" (mašīaḥ) و الإسم الآرامي "ܡܫܺܝܚܳܐ".
@Raffzahn@AnglishWitsmoot@theanglishtimes Then that's not Anglish, you can't complain of a concept doing what it's supposed to do. Anglish is not here for a more "practical" english, that isn't the premise of Anglish.
@Raffzahn@AnglishWitsmoot@theanglishtimes The point of anglish is to out the norman influence that came into english after 1066. whether it's practical to have "-able" in english, or whether it looks better, doesn't matter; if it's from norman influence, it's not anglish.