Michael Addario

Photographer & Filmmaker. Licensed SF Street Artist and FAA Certified Drone Pilot. Youtube Playlist:

[Michael Addario @AddarioMichael]

Meanwhile in Liedaho. #idaho4 #bryankohberger #liedaho

[Michael Addario @AddarioMichael]

I have to question whether this is AI-generated. Most drone pilots know that even a single contact with spinning drone blades can cause a serious laceration and potentially result in permanent eye damage. In addition, the driver appears to be on a regular public street rather than in a controlled course or closed environment where such an experiment could be conducted safely.

If this is real, I hope it doesn't inspire a trend among reckless individuals who underestimate the dangers involved. The potential for serious injury—to both the operator and bystanders—is significant.

[Michael Addario @AddarioMichael]

The Goncalves family reportedly refused to be interviewed by the prosecution even before they hired an criminal defense attorney Shanon Gray and critical communications — text messages, and what Madison Mogen allegedly told Adam — were withheld by them from public view.

The Goncalves family didn’t go initially to the crime scene and stayed home and watched a football game after they were told by their niece that Kaylee had been shot. They claimed Kaylee Goncalves was moving that weekend, but her room remained filled with belongings. They expressed unwavering support for Jack DuCoeur yet in over 3 years he has never spoken publicly about what happened to his beloved ex-girlfriend when he was just steps away from the crime scene.

[Michael Addario @AddarioMichael]

If Sy Ray truly believed that Bryan Kohberger was unquestionably guilty from the beginning, many people would naturally ask why he became involved with the defense team in the first place. Defense experts are generally brought in to challenge, test, or independently evaluate the prosecution’s evidence — not simply confirm it. #syray #idaho4 #bryankohbergrer

In my opinion, when Ray disclosed the possible use of a Cell Site Simulator (often referred to as a “StingRay”), he may have crossed into territory protected by extensive Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) commonly associated with that technology. Agencies using or training on such systems are often required to keep operational details confidential.

After Kohberger later pleaded guilty, it seemed to me that Ray may have realized he had upset longtime law enforcement associates — the same circles he works with professionally while promoting his software and training seminars. That could help explain what appeared to be a shift in tone and the later explanation that he was merely trying to educate the public on investigative methods.

Perhaps Judge Steven Hippler had concerns about Ray’s credibility or approach all along. That said, this is only my personal opinion and speculation based on publicly discussed events.

[Michael Addario @AddarioMichael]

@Algar1233 @MsFoxyRecon @LesleyMiss17638 I cover this possibility in my “Railroaded” film. But it is not included in the recently released autopsy reports. Another mystery.

https://t.co/LjxFEtsdBn

[Michael Addario @AddarioMichael]

Not only does Dr. Turvey describe the hair found in Ethan's hand, but if you watch the bodycam footage, two police officers appear to notice it as well. There was reportedly so much hair visible that one officer initially thought Ethan was holding a squirrel. There is also evidence that the bodies were moved and staged. These observations raises questions about the quantity and significance of the hair present and smears at the scene.

I cover this in my latest film. Blow Up @ Your Own Private Idaho. #idhao4 #bryankohbergrer #horror

https://t.co/Bl2XKkSErW

[Michael Addario @AddarioMichael]

@Milajoy The pandemic and prior politicians did hurt the city. We now have a new Mayor who has been working hard to restore the city. We will get by.
https://t.co/vC8NoKgnGg

[Michael Addario @AddarioMichael]

@SarahDIrish @ConspiracyChxz Thank you Sarah for keeping us up to date on these proceedings. Have a great day :)

[Michael Addario @AddarioMichael]

Being Memorial Day I feel this is appropriate. This is a play about a Veteran with PTSD that uses Shakespeare and theater to heal and help others. Ironically it was held on Nov. 12, 2022 at the Forge Theater in Moscow, Idaho. It is an excellent play which you can view at the link below. #idaho4 #bryankohberger #kopacka #moscowidaho

https://t.co/lQJ7KAqgMY

[Michael Addario @AddarioMichael]

58 years ago today #war #vietnam #TikTok https://t.co/Dhp67URuJE

[Michael Addario @AddarioMichael]

Most of Quentin Tarantino’s films are works of fiction with fictional characters. *Once Upon a Time in Hollywood* is different. Shot on film, on location in Los Angeles, it uses real names and real people connected to the 1969 murders of Sharon Tate—who was eight months pregnant—and four of her friends by followers of Charles Manson. For most of its runtime, the film presents itself as a historically grounded portrait of Sharon Tate’s life and Hollywood at the time, only to pivot sharply at the end into a complete fantasy that bears no resemblance to what actually happened.

Tarantino has long been criticized for his use—some would say overuse—of racial slurs and for his treatment of women in earlier films. Those movies, however, were explicitly fictional. *Once Upon a Time in Hollywood* is not. It trades on real trauma, real victims, and real history, which raises a different level of responsibility.

The story is set pre-AIDS, during the height of the sexual revolution, when birth control became widely available and social norms were radically different from today. Against that backdrop, the idea that a male lead would refuse unrequested oral sex from a young, attractive woman in exchange for a ride strains credibility for anyone who lived through that era. This was a time when thousands of young men were being shipped to Vietnam every week and hundreds were returning home in body bags. It was chaotic, reckless, and anything but sanitized. Weekly love-ins were not unusual. The film’s moral framing feels revisionist.

Tarantino attempts to portray Hollywood actors as occupying a kind of moral high ground. That portrayal collapses under even minimal scrutiny. Sharon Tate’s husband, Roman Polanski, was later convicted of raping a 14-year-old girl. Tarantino himself has publicly minimized that crime, at one point suggesting the victim “asked for it”—a statement that speaks volumes about his perspective.

There is also Tarantino’s long-standing financial and professional relationship with Harvey Weinstein, a convicted rapist who preyed on aspiring actresses for decades. Tarantino later admitted that two close female friends had warned him about Weinstein’s behavior and that he wished he had done more. That admission raises uncomfortable questions about what was known, what was ignored, and why.

Taken together, *Once Upon a Time in Hollywood* reads less like a meditation on loss and more like a subliminal attempt to launder Hollywood’s conscience—using the Tate murders to redirect blame, soften scrutiny, and obscure the industry’s own complicity. It reframes history in a way that flatters Hollywood while sidelining the people who were exploited, abused, or killed.

Many younger viewers sensed this disconnect without fully understanding why. To them, the film simply didn’t make sense. Without the weight of the Tate murders, the story amounts to little more than a meandering portrait of two Hollywood actors past their prime. The real tragedy is used as narrative fuel, then rewritten to avoid confronting the darker truths behind it.

No artist is required to reproduce history verbatim. But when an artist chooses to use real people and real violence, there is an ethical obligation to at least present what happened honestly. Stylization is one thing. Whitewashing is another.

[Michael Addario @AddarioMichael]

Who could this be?
https://t.co/fKJrufcSUy

[Michael Addario @AddarioMichael]

@NoshMuller A small sample of these evildoers endeavors.

https://t.co/3o2kGtII5K

[Michael Addario @AddarioMichael]

#MarkFurman #idaho4 #MarkFuhrman #bryankohberger
This is a photo of LA detective Mark Fuhrman in 1997 pointing to the bloody glove discovered at the crime scene in the stabbing deaths of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman.

Law enforcement in that case documented a massive blood trail, along with shoe prints and even paw prints from Nicole’s dog, which reportedly left the scene and led people back for help. Those are the kinds of physical indicators many people would expect in a brutal stabbing case — details that critics argue appear conspicuously absent in the Idaho 4 case.

[Michael Addario @AddarioMichael]

“Follow the money.” Is the Public Defender’s Office receiving funding from outside sources tied to policies aimed at reducing jail populations?

It may sound far-fetched, but questions arise when funding appears connected to criminal justice reform agendas. For example, the District Attorney’s Office reportedly received millions in outside support until District Attorney Brooke Jenkins began taking a tougher stance on crime and incarceration, after which some of that funding was reportedly withdrawn.

I believe the traditional San Francisco criminal justice system — one focused on protecting citizens, prosecuting offenders, and imposing meaningful consequences — has been slowly and methodically weakened over the years through policy shifts, political pressure, and reform movements.

Rebuilding public trust and restoring balance to the system could take decades.

[Michael Addario @AddarioMichael]

Join Pete, Alicia, and me LIVE on Murder Metal Mayhem this May 16, 2026, at 2 PM Pacific / 4 PM Central / 5PM East Coast as we discuss all things related to the Idaho 4 case. Don’t miss this in-depth conversation and live audience interaction.

Murder Metal Mayhem brings you another LIVE to go to deep into the Idaho 4 case with special guests Michael Addario https://t.co/HFCfsftJZv
and MsLeading Evidence @msleadingevidence - we’ll discuss forensic expert Dr. Brent Turvey’s recent interviews regarding alleged mishandling of crime scene evidence, questions surrounding the controversial knife sheath, and Brian Kohberger’s shocking last-minute guilty plea.

https://t.co/YsJzenjzVd

[Michael Addario @AddarioMichael]

@supastarVIBEZ @Basedtexans To answer your question the clump of hair clutched in Ethan’s hand was so large that one of the responding officers originally thought it was a squirrel. The hair also didn’t match Kohberger’s hair, was listed as debris and was not tested for DNA.

https://t.co/CDm0m0nLyY

[Michael Addario @AddarioMichael]

@BadMomBree @ConspiracyChxz I want to know what was in that data dump? If that made a difference or that they came to the conclusion that Kohberger could not get a fair trial in Liedaho?

[Michael Addario @AddarioMichael]

@MariaDeAngelo9 @AWallace1246 Ethan had a clump of hair clutched in his hand. One of the responding officer thought it looked like a dead squirrel. You can hear it on the bodycam and the hair clump is written in the book Broken Plea. If you watch my latest film it all in there.

[Michael Addario @AddarioMichael]

@AWallace1246 @MariaDeAngelo9 I heard the rumor a while back and it appears in one of the crime scene photos there is a body part that could be it but it wasn’t until today and viewing this clip that I heard the officer talk about it.