The whole nation knew Siti Hasmah as being free hair in almost all of her public appearances, bar one or two (or a few) occasions when she was photographed with her head covered.
Yet in death, Azrul Mohd Khalib chooses to cartoonise her memory in hijab.
aww ad hominem in display, ricky?
pls go bck to basic science, n logic philo instead of being drunk , ricky.😂🙏🏻
Ricky: “cat and dog both hv four legs and made of carbon. so theyre the same!”
cognitive dissonance was when u got caught not understanding science n committed major categorical error in ur very “cotcha card”.
they shared same chemical elements doest make em explicitly same.
diff chem structure. diff purpose. diff thing. completely.
ur lvl is jz low🤣
She was wearing hijab in her final moment lol.
and whats w not respecting islamic belief here?
Coverin aura of arwah’s (men/women) pic is done out of respect n honour in islam. Not as form of humiliation.
every religion has its way of honouring the deceased.
no, ricky. u kept on using fallacy of equivocation.
the shared attribute of “liquid entering body” doesnt make em equal.
content isnt the same. purpose of both aint the same. they only shared same chemical elements. but completely diff things.
and als… (cont. below 1/2)
Because the content is the same.
Because you fail to see it's how the content is being used that is the issue at hand.
Because you throw Jesus under the bus who turned water to wine.
🤡
and no, jz bcuase they share same attribute of “liquid entering body” doesnt justify ur argument, ricky😂
In fact showed how illiterate n illogical u are.
u dense?. claimed arak has sgnfcant benefits, then used medical alcohol as evidence. major fault. scientifically. logically. categorically
if ur brain cant even comprehend n differentiate both explicitly categorical error, then u def not at the same lvl as me, ricky.
notice how u use ad hominem as buzzword when it was u avoiding first question and did incoherent comparison?
and as cherry on top, u explicitly and ignorantly did fallacy of equivocation to the beverage vs medical alcohol as ur “triumph card”. 😂
ur jz not on my lvl, ricky
@RainDeeD no, andrew. ignorant is believing the medical alcohol as mentioned in screenshot is explicitly the same as alcoholic beverages.
fact tht u failed to recognise this categorical failure just showed tht ur the lamb thts already in slaughter house.
this what happens when ur lack of contextual comprehension & lack ability for logical categorisation.
dont lol me, ricky. u jz embarrassed tht ur “gotcha card” was fallacy of equivocation .
hence the reason for ur incoherent comparison n failure to answer my very 1st question