Adrian

katolik, 🇵🇱, pozdro

[Adrian @Adrian51230]

@jack__sparrow5 Niesamowita tragedia
Katolicki Kardynał nawołuje do MIŁOWANIA BLIŹNIEGO

Ciekawe skąd się mu to wzięło...

[Adrian @Adrian51230]

@Maria45242013 @jack__sparrow5 Lewackie? Niech Pani zobaczy poglądy Jezusa Chrystusa, wie Pani czego ON uczył?
Miłości do wszystkich ludzi, a zwłaszcza do nieprzyjaciół

[Adrian @Adrian51230]

@MateuszM26 @jack__sparrow5 Nie wiem jaka jest pańska religia, ale katolicy (czyli np. ksiądz kardynał Ryś):
Po pierwsze ST czytają tylko w świetle NT (polecam Kazanie na Górze Mt 5 - Mt 7)
Po drugie katolików nie obowiązuje prawo sądowe i ceremonialne ze ST (obowiązuje nas tylko prawo moralne)

[Adrian @Adrian51230]

@HaKejt 12. Kościół jednoznacznie definiuje NOM jako Ofiarę, więc każdy poprawnie odprawiony obrzęd uobecnia tę Ofiarę, niezależnie od tego co o tym myśli celebrans

Książkę od dłuższego czasu planuje kupić, po tych fragmentach chęć jej kupna we mne wzrosła.
Niech Bóg Pani Błogosławi
5/5

[Adrian @Adrian51230]

@HaKejt 11. Dwuznaczność NOM opiera się na subiektywnej ocenie autora, który w uproszczeniu gestów i zamianie przestrzeni dostrzega utratę sensu. Jednak Kościół posiadający władze nad dyscypliną sakramentów, uznaje tę formę za w pełni poprawną

4/5

[Adrian @Adrian51230]

@billswerski1985 And regarding the authenticity of the texts, neither you nor any single trinitarian gets to decide what is or isn't authentic
3/3

[Adrian @Adrian51230]

@billswerski1985 The Father is not the Son or the Holy Spirit.
The Son is not the Father or the Holy Spirit.
The Holy Spirit is not the Father or the Son.
What they have in common is that they are God, and God is one. Do not try to comprehend this with human logic, because God is God,
1/3

[Adrian @Adrian51230]

@billswerski1985 and God cannot be fully comprehended.
As for the delegation of authority: yes, that delegation does not make Jesus literally the Father, but it puts Him on an equal footing, and God is one—just as Jesus says: 'Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one' (Mark 12:29).
2/3

[Adrian @Adrian51230]

@Adrian51230 Jesus is not the Father. So of course it is not literal. The Father delegating his authority to his son does not make the son literally the Father.

And your quoting the Johannine comma which is widely accepted as a forgery by most Trintiarians says it all

[Adrian @Adrian51230]

@billswerski1985 In Genesis 48:16, the singular 'name' refers to a shared family lineage, heritage, and patriarchal authority (Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob as the founding fathers). However, in Matthew 28:19, Jesus places the Son and the Holy Spirit on an equal divine footing with the Father 1/2

[Adrian @Adrian51230]

@billswerski1985 "And now, Father, glorify me in your own presence with the glory that I had with you before the world existed." John 17:5

3/3

[Adrian @Adrian51230]

@billswerski1985 And in the Gospel of John it says:

"Jesus answered him, 'Philip, have I been with you so long, and you still do not know me? Whoever has seen me has seen the Father.'" John 14:9

2/3

[Adrian @Adrian51230]

@Adrian51230 Just like it says "in the name" (singular) not "in names" (plural) of Abraham and Isaac in Gen 48:16. Even though it lists two persons

[Adrian @Adrian51230]

@billswerski1985 "Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,"
Matthew 28:19

Notice that Jesus says "in the name" (singular) no "in the names" (plural) even though He lists three Persons

[Adrian @Adrian51230]

@Ui_j11 @trad_west_ Jesus called himself 'I AM', which refers to the name that God revealed to Moses: 'I AM WHO I AM'

Jesus is God

[Adrian @Adrian51230]

@dawahxdialogues No, JESUS IS GOD