Adrian John Oliver

Life Alignment healing & training, Qest4 bioresonance. Green Party councillor for Highgate Ward, LB Camden 2006-10 (Green Party now a tool of the WEF)

[English Gentleman 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧🇺🇸 @EngGentleman7]

One notes the immediate conclusion that a public offer of cooperation must be a publicity stunt.

The alternative explanation is apparently unthinkable: that a politician might state his position openly, accept the risk of rejection, and leave the other side to respond in full view of the public.

Private negotiation has its place. It also has a long record of producing vague assurances, delayed replies, and outcomes that are later denied or watered down.

A clear public statement removes that ambiguity. It forces a response. It allows supporters of both parties to see exactly what was offered and how it was met.

To treat transparency itself as evidence of bad faith is a curious standard. It suggests that the only acceptable approach is one conducted behind closed doors, where the public cannot judge the seriousness of either party.

The country is entitled to watch the exchange and draw its own conclusions. It is not obliged to begin with the assumption that any open move must be theatre.

Yours in preference for clarity over the insistence on secrecy,
A Gentleman from the Old School

[Chris Martenson @chrismartenson]

This list from Toby Rogers has been living rent-free in my head. It's not like "they" got a few things right and a few things wrong, they got EVERYTHING wrong, which means this was intentional.

[Noah B. Price @TrueOnX]

🚨 THE MOST FORBIDDEN
PREDICTION IN HISTORY WAS MADE OVER 100 YEARS AGO… AND NO ONE IS ALLOWED TO TALK ABOUT IT 🚨

Rudolf Steiner (the man who founded anthroposophy and saw further than almost any mind of the 20th century) looked into the future and said this with cold precision:

“In the future we will
eliminate the soul with medicine.

Under the pretext of a ‘healthy point of view’ there will be a vaccine by which the human being will be treated as soon as possible at birth so that he cannot develop the thought of the existence of soul and Spirit…

He will be extremely intelligent… but he will not develop a conscience.”

He described the exact mechanism: a substance that loosens the etheric body from the physical, turning human beings into brilliant, efficient automatons... immune to the “madness” of spiritual life.

Now look around.

What if the greatest medical “advances” of the last century were never primarily about health… but about frequency, perception, and the quiet amputation of the higher self?

What if the real war was never left vs right, but spirit vs matter… and medicine became the quiet battlefield?

What if entire generations are being raised with world-class intellects and almost zero capacity to feel the sacred?

What if the people who control the laboratories already know this?

And what happens to a civilization when its children can no longer feel God… only data?

Steiner didn’t say this as poetry.
He said it as a warning from a man who could see the Ahrimanic forces arriving.

So I ask yYou
the only questions
that matter:

If Steiner was right… what year did the injection start working?

How many of us are already walking around with our etheric bodies loosened and don’t even know it?

Why is questioning this treated as more dangerous than the substance itself?

And the final,
bloodchilling one:

If the soul can be medically suppressed… who benefits most from a world without souls?

The system was never broken.
It was built this way.

Your body is not a machine.
Your soul is not for sale.

Wake up. Or become the very automaton Steiner described.

Question everything. Especially the things that claim to “save” you.

Let me know what You think,
and SHARE THIS so that others may too!

And if You're not already following
@TrueOnX...
What the heck are You doing?!

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

This 'journalist' tries to paint me as 'far-right' and racist.

Elon shuts her, and the entire mainstream media, down in the most glorious way.

[Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil @ivan_8848]

🚨When They Blame Putin for Starting the War, Show Them This

GREAT JOB - The Golden Archive

Thank you so much to Chris Todd Nolan 👏👏👏

How it really began in 2014.

The Ukrainian leadership decided that they could simply kill or intimidate everyone dissatisfied with the illegal change of power.

An unelected government began killing its "own" people in the south-east of the country after visits from Joe Biden and John Brennan.

And the war began.

The entire "civilized world" was silent even then - it was also silent for all eight years of the destruction of the free Donbass.

Today’s war cannot be understood without first understanding the U.S. government’s role in Ukraine's Maidan Coup.

0:46 DEC1, 2013 - Euromaidan
02:46 FEB20, 2014 - Hotel Snipers
03:44 FEB22 - Yanukovych Removed
04:03 FEB23 - Sevastopol
04:41 MAR7 - Donetsk
05:00 MAR16 - The Crimean Referendum
05:07 APR7 - The Donetsk People’s Republic
05:14 APR12 - Slavyansk
06:06 APR12/13 - A Visit from the CIA Director
06:32 APR15 - Acting President Launches “Anti-Terrorist Operation”
08:02 APR20 - Right Sector Attacks Slavyansk
08:25 APR21 - A Visit from Joe Biden
09:22 APR29 - Lugansk
09:39 MAY2 - The Odessa Massacre
12:18 MAY9 - Assault on Mariupol Police Station
13:16 MAY11 - The Donetsk & Lugansk Referendums
14:04 MAY25 - President Poroshenko Elected
14:36 MAY26 - Assault on Donetsk Airport
15:17 JUN2 - Airstrike in Lugansk
16:05 JUN3 - Hospital Shelled in Krasny Liman
16:47 JUN4 - Obama Meets Poroshenko
16:56 JUN8 - The Shelling of Slavyansk
18:03 JUN13 - Azov Battalion Takes Mariupol
18:31 JUN18 - Fighting Near Lugansk
18:46 JUN20 - Poroshenko’s Ceasefire Begins
19:12 JUN30 - End of Ceasefire in Kramatorsk
19:49 JUL2 - Airstrike in Stanitsa Luganska
20:19 JUL5 - Ukraine Takes Slavyansk
20:30 JUL10 - Fighting in Karlovka
20:55 JUL12 - Shelling in Lugansk, Malinka & Donetsk
22:11 JUL14 - More Shelling in Lugansk
22:48 JUL15 - Airstrike in Snezhnoye/OSCE Visits Lugansk

Thank you so much to Chris Todd Nolan @ChrisToddNolan
👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

Restore Britain Greater Manchester candidate Marlon West speaks out after his suspension from nursing following his social media posts about his daughter being raped by gangs of Pakistani Muslims.

@MarlonTag was disgracefully suspended by the NMC just days before the election.

[Valerie Anne Smith @ValerieAnne1970]

Dr. Bryan Ardis Exposes How HUMAN & ANIMAL DNA in Vaccines is Triggering an Autoimmune Epidemic

Foreign HUMAN and ANIMAL DNA fragments are being injected straight into your body through vaccines — and your immune system is programmed to REJECT anything that isn’t “you.”

Dr. Ardis lays it out clearly:
When they grow viruses in human fetal cells or chicken eggs (and other animal tissues), residual DNA from those foreign sources ends up in the final product. Your body sees this alien DNA and goes to war… against YOUR OWN tissues.

Result?
- Autoimmune diseases skyrocketing
- Your immune system attacking healthy cells it now mistakes for invaders
- A lifetime of chronic inflammation, organ damage, and mystery illnesses

Animal organs & cell lines used:
- Monkey kidney cells (Vero cells)
- Chicken embryo cultures
- Dog kidney cells (MDCK tumorogenic)
- Bovine (cow) extracts, casein, serum
- Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)
- Fall armyworm ovary cells (Sf9 insect cells) — yes, ovaries from the fall armyworm moth!

Many are still grown in **aborted baby organs** — lungs, kidneys, retinas from 3-month-old fetuses (WALVAX-2, HEK-293, MRC-5, WI-38). As recent as 2015 for WALVAX-2.

This isn’t “safe and effective.”
This is foreign DNA contamination being normalized as medicine.

Share this before they inject another generation.
Your body was never designed to handle someone else’s DNA.

[Artur Nadolny @ArturNadol7566]

YOU WERE NEVER WARNED ABOUT THIS BEFORE BOARDING YOUR FLIGHT

A retired airline captain named John Hoyte @JohnHoytePilot reached out to me recently. He flew commercially for nearly 30 years. He developed serious neurological damage mid-career. Lost his career. Then spent the next 20 years trying to warn the public about what happened to him.

What he shared with me should concern every single person who has ever sat on a plane.

Did you know the air inside most commercial aircraft does not come from outside?

It is compressed directly from the jet engines and pumped straight into the cabin. That is the air you and your family breathe for the entire flight.

When engine seals wear down, oil and hydraulic fluid leak into that air supply. Those fluids contain organophosphates. The same compounds found in nerve agents and certain pesticides. You inhale them without knowing. Without any warning.

In 2007, 27 pilots, cabin crew, passengers, doctors and scientists gave evidence to @UKParliament on this. On the record. Calling for urgent action.

Nothing changed.

@BBCPanorama covered it in 2008. A UK coroner recorded a death linked to contaminated cabin air in 2015. Twenty passengers on a single flight in 2007 were seriously injured. Their cases went to court. They won.

France has formally recognised aerotoxic syndrome as an occupational disease. America's largest personal injury firm is now taking mass cases. A US law professor is suing Boeing for $40 million after a single exposure left him permanently injured.

Almost every commercial jet except the Boeing 787 Dreamliner uses this system. The 787 was designed differently. A safer option always existed. The rest of the industry chose not to use it.

John founded the Aerotoxic Association in 2007 at the Houses of Parliament. He is 70 years old. He has been fighting this for two decades. Over 2,500 people have contacted him believing they were harmed.

He is still looking for a mainstream journalist willing to investigate this properly. That alone tells you everything about how buried this story has been.

Have you ever stepped off a flight feeling exhausted, foggy, or just not right and assumed it was the journey? That might not be the whole story.

Share this. The only reason this has stayed hidden for 70 years is that not enough people know about it.

Captain John Hoyte is available to answer every question directly. Contact him at [email protected]

Sources:
@AerotoxicAssoc
@BALPApilots (British Airline Pilots Association)
@forthepeople (Morgan & Morgan)
gcaqe org (Global Cabin Air Quality Executive)
@BBCPanorama covered it in 2008 with a full documentary titled Something in the Air.
@heraldtweets

@WSJ
@FlightGlobal
@TheCanaryUK

[Dries Van Langenhove @DVanLangenhove]

A very sad announcement.

I have just been convicted a second time for 'hate speech' and it is only due to a technicality that I could not immediately be sent to jail —to the judge's frustration.

In an ironic turn of events it's actually thanks to my previous prison sentence (for memes in a private group chat) that I am now still free —in a physical sense, at least.

Call me naive but I didn't think they would take it this far, given that this precedent criminalises many of the arguments used by even the most moderate politicians critical of mass migration.

In February 2024 I gave a lecture at Catholic University Leuven wherein I linked mass migration to crime and a deterioration of our quality of life. Every single point I made was 100% the truth and based on scientific evidence.

Cynically, even the judge that convicted me admits as much by writing in his verdict: “Even if all of the statements made by Van Langenhove are based on scientific evidence and statistics, it makes no difference to the criminal intent. Van Langenhove is not charged with spreading false information. He is charged with presenting facts in a way that incites hatred against persons on the grounds of one or more of the protected criteria in the Anti-Racism Law.”

That's a lot of words just to say he wants to send me to prison for speaking the truth.

Even the regime media write: "It did not matter to the court that Van Langenhove was quoting scientific sources. The judge argued that Van Langenhove's main message was that a big part of the societal problems like insecurity, housing shortages and lowering educational standards are due to mass migration."

You may think the regime media are being sympathetic to me in the first sentence, but in reality they are warning people: even if you speak the truth, if you go against our narrative, we will crush you in every way possible.

Both the public prosecutor and the judge did not present a single real argument as to how or against whom I would have incited hatred. So even if I would accept their crazy, dystopic law, I still did not break it.

The only argument they present is that I created a "hostile atmosphere of us versus them” in regards to migrants. But even this silly argument (which is not even a punishable offence) is not true. To me, the deadly disease is self-hatred and one of its worst symptoms is replacement migration. My enemy is thus NOT the migrants themselves but those orchestrating the mass migration.

Sadly, in Belgium, evidence is not needed and ‘vibes’ are enough to put someone in jail.

Given the fact that I have another court case coming up in September and that I have a dozen active criminal investigations for hate speech, time is running out for me. I have already paid more than €420,000 in legal fees and there is no ending in sight. I have been in an intense battle of attrition for eight years and must now regroup to make sure I can still win.

If you want to help me, you can do so via the links below. If you can help in other ways, please contact me via DM.

If you live in a country that still has free speech, never let them touch it, however noble they make the motives sound, because this is where it leads to.

[Al Morell @AMBcancun]

#ÚLTIMAHORA VLADIMIR PUTIN 🇷🇺

¡Rusia nunca ha sido y nunca será su enemigo!

No queremos materias primas y riquezas europeas, tenemos nuestras propias materias primas y riquezas, no necesitamos en absoluto sus materias primas. Rusia es el país más rico del mundo en términos de materias primas.

No queremos su tierra ni su territorio. Miren qué amplia es Rusia en el mapa. Rusia es el doble del tamaño de toda Europa en un solo lugar. ¿Para qué necesitaríamos su tierra, qué hacemos con ella?

¿Por qué creen que Rusia es enemiga de Europa?

¿Qué daño les ha hecho Rusia?

¿Les hemos vendido gas y materias primas a precios más bajos que los precios a los que sus "amigos" les venden actualmente? SÍ

¿Rusia sacrificó a 20 millones de personas en la Segunda Guerra Mundial para deshacerse de los nazis? SÍ

¿Fue Rusia el primer país que ayudó a Europa durante la pandemia de COVID? SÍ

¿Ayudamos a Europa cuando hubo incendios y desastres naturales? SÍ

¿Qué les ha hecho Rusia que la odian tanto?

Rusia no es vuestro enemigo; vuestros verdaderos enemigos son vuestros dirigentes, aquellos que os dirigen".

Vladimir Putin dixit..
-

[Adrian John Oliver @AdrianJOliver1]

CO2 is a nutritive gas. The more CO2, the more lush and greener our planet becomes, the more life it can sustain. Our climate is determined by solar activity and proximity of the earth’s orbit to the sun. The appropriate Net Zero policy is to scrap it and focus on reducing genuine pollution that is poisoning our air, earth and water, and, consequently, all life on this planet.

[Adrian John Oliver @AdrianJOliver1]

I made a criminal complaint to @ThamesVP regarding the administering of the COVID19 jabs by clinicians who were doing so without obtaining informed consent, which is a criminal office - assault and battery, or where injury occurred, GBH? and where death occurred, at least manslaughter, perhaps murder. I got a crime reference number, but no call back. Tens of millions of criminal offences with resultant immediate and ongoing deaths, injuries and suffering. The police could and should have put a stop to it and failed us. Who are they serving? I am considering taking it further and would welcome a chat. DM me if you are happy to or would like further details.

[Adrian John Oliver @AdrianJOliver1]

https://t.co/YkbPNs3alC

[Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 @JChimirie66677]

Labour Loves the Countryside. It Just Hates the People Who Run It.

A woman walks into a tailor's shop in Helmsley, North Yorkshire. She loves the heather hills, she says. The wooded dales. The purple moorland stretching to the horizon. What she cannot stand is the shooting that takes place on the Glorious Twelfth.
Jeremy Shaw, the tailor, has heard this before. He considers whether to explain that the heather she travelled three hours to admire exists because of the grouse moor she despises. The gamekeepers who manage the land, suppress the bracken, and keep the moorland in the condition that makes it worth visiting. The cake, in other words, was baked by the baker she came to castigate. What is worrying is that the government shares her confusion.

On March 18, Labour published its Land Use Framework. Half a million acres earmarked for solar panels. Nine percent of farmland committed to rewilding. And buried on page 45, a proposal to license game bird shooting, potentially restricting pheasant and partridge releases onto estates. The trail hunting ban came first. Licensing comes next. Each measure arrives with its own rationale. Together they form a programme.

Licensing does not prohibit. Bureaucracy does not ban. Smaller shoots simply cannot absorb compliance costs, fold quietly, and nobody in Whitehall answers for the consequence. A Natural England case near Helmsley shows the method. A longstanding partridge shoot was barred from releasing birds until after the season had already started. Shoot days cancelled. Revenue gone. Natural England's hands formally clean.

Helmsley bucks every trend in British retail. Four pubs in the town square. A Michelin-starred inn nearby. A tailor forty years in business in what a mentor once called a dying trade. Seventy-five percent of Shaw's revenue is shooting-related. The Pheasant hotel runs at sixty percent shooting occupancy through winter. The deli sells local cheese to Norwegian and German sportsmen. Shooting contributes £3.3 billion annually to the UK economy and supports nearly 147,000 jobs. Pull the shooting thread and the weave comes apart.

One Helmsley pub changed hands a few years ago. The new owners decided they wanted nothing to do with shoot trade. They lost heavily, then went back to the estates cap in hand. The market delivered the verdict that policy is not yet ready to impose openly. Licensing achieves the same result without anyone having to take responsibility.

The conservation argument collapses under scrutiny. Grouse moor owners have restored 217,000 acres of upland heath in the past 25 years. The almost-extinct curlew is four times more likely to fledge on a managed grouse moor than on unmanaged moorland. The landscape that Whitehall has identified as the problem is the reason the landscape exists in the form they claim to value.

When asked what economic trade-offs it had actually modelled, the government was vague. Officials said they recognised shooting's cultural importance and would work with industry toward a sustainable relationship. Starmer has been invited to visit Helmsley and see how the economy functions. He has not replied.

He should go. He should meet the gamekeeper loading double guns through winter to keep the household solvent. The beaters earning seventy pounds a day. The tailor measuring 24 keepers for tweed suits stitched with Essex lining and Yorkshire zips.
What rural Britain is being offered instead is a licensing regime that will first eliminate smaller shoots, then larger ones, then the hotels and tailors and pubs, until the moorland reverts to bracken and the towns that shooting sustained join the dying high streets that apparently only the countryside had managed to avoid.

The heather on the North York Moors, Jeremy Shaw at Carters Country Wear, and the market town of Helmsley. All three exist because of shooting. Labour's Land Use Framework puts all three at risk.

[Simon Dixon @SimonDixonTwitt]

▶️ Here’s a 5-min trailer from my recent appearance on InfoWars’ The American Journal with Tim Tompkins & Rex Jones, discussing what happens if the Strait of Hormuz stays closed for months.

https://t.co/ZOoBOGwR0b

Watch the full interview here: https://t.co/ZOoBOGwR0b

[𝐃𝐔𝐓𝐂𝐇 @pr0ud_americans]

FOLLOW THE MONEY: HOW BILLIONS IN GRANTS KEEP THE CLIMATE ALARM MACHINE RUNNING

That's one of the biggest red flags in this whole climate debate—and I've been calling it out for years: the scientists pushing the nonstop "crisis" narrative aren't out there hunting for raw truth. They're guarding their funding lifeline with everything they've got.

Ian Plimer drops the mic on this in his latest interviews (like that explosive Triggernometry one): "Follow the money." It's that simple. Government agencies—NSF, NASA, NOAA—are pumping out billions every year into climate-related research. NSF's budget clocks in around $8-9 billion overall, with massive chunks funneled into geosciences and climate programs. NASA's science directorate pulls in over $7 billion. NOAA's climate and research efforts grab hundreds of millions to billions in targeted dollars (recent FY26 bills kept NOAA around $6 billion total, with science/research holding steady despite attempted cuts elsewhere).

Here's the catch: Grants flow freely to projects that scream "urgent catastrophe," model apocalyptic scenarios, and back big policy pushes like net-zero mandates. But if your work echoes Plimer's geological reality—high CO₂ levels in the past paired with massive ice ages, natural cycles driving most change, no runaway warming from trace human emissions—your proposal gets sidelined. Labs shrink. Careers stall. Funding vanishes.

It's a classic conflict of interest baked right into the system. These researchers depend on federal grants for staff, equipment, publications, conferences—everything. Rock the boat by questioning the CO₂-doomsday story, and you're suddenly on the outside looking in. No wonder the so-called "consensus" feels unbreakable—it's financially engineered, not scientifically earned.

Plimer's reel cuts straight through the noise: This isn't about following evidence wherever it leads. It's a self-perpetuating grant empire dressed up as urgent science. The cash shapes the conclusions, not the other way around. True science thrives on skepticism and debate, not trillion-dollar incentives to echo the approved line.

You've been spot-on hammering this point forever, and it's more relevant now than ever. Voices like Plimer's are breaking through because the truth doesn't need subsidies to stand tall.

Share if you've seen the same grift for years! Let's keep exposing it. #FollowTheMoney #ClimateGrants

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

Restore Britain’s policy on Digital ID is clear - it is one of the most dangerous shifts in the relationship between the individual and the state in modern British history.

A compulsory Digital ID has been temporarily halted, not permanently scrapped - this is important to remember.

Through systems like Gov UK One Login, millions of people are being pushed into a centralised identity system just to access basic services or operate a business. Company directors are being told to comply or lose the ability to function as a LTD company. This is unacceptable.

We are already seeing the expansion into digital wallets, digital driving licences, digital veteran cards and even schemes for children.

If you can control identity, you can control access to services, to work, to travel, to participation in everyday life. To vote. I detest it.

That is the direction of travel. And it must be stopped. A Restore Britain Government would end the mission creep of a surveillance state and allow people to easily live offline if they choose to do so.

We will scrap mandated enforcement of One Login and allow people to opt out fully, with a clear and reliable offline alternative using physical documentation.

We will guarantee that every citizen can access public services without digital verification. No one will be excluded, penalised, or locked out for choosing to live offline.

There will be no discrimination. Freedom of choice will be restored.

We will repeal the expansion of digital ID through the children and wellbeing schools bill legislation where NHS numbers are being converted into lifelong Digital IDs. The state has no right to build lifelong tracking systems for children.

We will oppose mandatory ID or biometric verification for accessing the internet. People must be free to speak, engage, and participate online without being forced to identify themselves.

We will end centralised data control. No single system should hold the keys to a person’s identity and access to society.

Restore Britain will end facial recognition in public spaces. We will roll back mass surveillance. The British public are not suspects or walking barcodes.

We will respect our veterans and not use them as guinea pigs to trial digital ID through digital veteran cards.

And most importantly, we will protect your right to live offline.

No government should be able to force digital ID onto the British people.

In a free country - you should not need permission, a login, or a digital profile to exist.

Restore Britain will defend that principle.

We will protect your right to live lawfully, freely and privately.

There is now a serious political party willing to draw a line and say enough is enough.

Restore Britain.

[Adrian John Oliver @AdrianJOliver1]

[SPECIAL] - Scott Ritter : Trump attacks Iran - 'Epic Fury' or Epic FAIL ? https://t.co/2dyAr65Gun via @YouTube