#FCM Volume just keeps coming in. Increasing daily with the SharePrice 🔥 4p breakout today
#FUM Warning up ! Final clearance from the seller and no stopping 📈
#TLM We now starting to get some buyers. This new copper play getting noticed slowly
Agenda2030
Their stretch target is for people to eat NO MEAT or Dairy
They don't want people to fly more than once every 3years
They don't want private car ownership
They even have a target of you only buying a few pieces of new clothing a year.
Seriously.
This is Marxism on steroids dressed as being good and concerned for the environment...
And don't forget whilst they want to push this dystopia
At the same time , they are building enormous data centres in beautiful areas of nature and destroying swathes of flora and fauna , which require a country sized amount of energy and water.
These people are DANGEROUS FRAUDS-who want to control us all whilst making a fortune
The damage they have caused to this country in 2 years is immense.
https://t.co/2x9oC9ypr2
🚨The BBC had just sunk to a new low.
On Newsnight last night, presenter Matt Chorley claimed Nigel Farage said people should respond to the murder of Henry Nowak with “white cold rage”.
Nigel DID NOT SAY THIS.
The insertion of the word “white” by the BBC is obviously designed to change the meaning completely.
It was no slip of the tongue, Chorley said it THREE TIMES.
He came prepared to defame Nigel and lie to the country.
This is disgusting from the BBC.
Why do they insist on spitting in the faces of the millions of Reform supporters who are forced to contribute to their salaries?
THE BBC MUST APOLOGISE IMMEDIATELY
Send the video to everyone you know showing how heinously Nowak was treated by the police in his dying moments and how the police cravenly kowtowed to his murderer.
Legacy mainstream media, same ones who wrote about George Floyd millions of times, are dead silent about Nowak.
The West has created an utterly evil state religion where an accusation of “racism” is the gravest offense that can be committed, even worse than rape or murder!
So if police show up at a crime scene and a British boy is bleeding out and an immigrant says the British boy is racist the cops will cuff the dying British boy.
BOVAER: PART 2.0
JUST THE TIP OF A VERY NASTY CHEMICAL ICEBERG:
Supermarkets tell us milk is “fresh”, “simple”, “natural”.
But they never tell us what the cows are actually fed.
Behind the scenes: bakery waste, chemical preservatives, synthetic nitrogen (urea), ethanol by‑products, ionophores, mould‑binders… and now methane‑suppressing additives like Bovaer.
None of this appears on the label.
Families deserve transparency.
If supermarkets can list every ingredient in a loaf of bread:
Why can’t they list what’s fed to the cows that make our milk?
What supermarkets don’t tell you about cattle feed:
We imagine cows eating grass.
Supermarkets encourage that image — rolling fields, sunshine, happy cows.
But modern dairy feed is a complex mix of:
• Bakery waste
• Distillers grains
• Urea (synthetic nitrogen fertiliser)
• Ionophores
• Chemical preservatives
• Mycotoxin binders
• Buffers
• Enzymes
• Bovaer
None of this appears on milk labels.
Not even in the “sourcing” pages on supermarket websites.
Supermarkets know consumers care about additives.
They label everything in human food…
but zero transparency on animal feed.
If feed additives are safe
If they’re beneficial
If they’re essential…
Why hide them?
Families deserve honesty.
We shouldn’t need to dig through agricultural journals to know what’s entering the food chain.
Transparency builds trust.
Silence destroys it.
3. SUPERMARKET‑BY‑SUPERMARKET TRANSPARENCY BREAKDOWN:
Tesco
• Provides “grass‑fed” imagery
• No disclosure of feed additives
• No mention of Bovaer or ionophores
• Organic range is the only one with feed transparency
Sainsbury’s
• Similar to Tesco
• No feed ingredient lists
• No disclosure of preservatives, binders, or rumen modifiers
Asda
• No feed transparency
• No mention of additives
• No sourcing detail beyond “British milk”
Morrisons
• Strong on “British farming” branding
• Weak on feed transparency
• No additive disclosure
Waitrose
• Better welfare standards
• Still no full feed ingredient list
• No disclosure of Bovaer or other rumen modifiers
Aldi / Lidl
• No feed transparency
• No additive disclosure
• No sourcing detail beyond “British”
Co‑op
• Ethical branding
• Still no feed transparency
• No additive disclosure
Conclusion:
Every major UK supermarket lists ingredients for human food.
None list ingredients for the feed that produces milk, cheese, yoghurt, butter, or beef.
This is the Transparency Gap.
What’s missing...
• Labels
• Transparency
• Consumer choice
• Informed consent
• Public awareness
LACK OF INFORMATION = LACK OF ACCOUNTABILITY
@ClaireCoutinho The list is endless, basically anyone working in an organisation who has a carbon reduction remit e.g. :
Insulation installers
Local authority planning
Public transport
Car manufacturers
etc etc
The deceit is beyond comparison.
@ClaireCoutinho They are also using the misdirection line "Create Jobs" The Biden Admin did this, they invent Jobs that are only on paper but are never actually filled
@ClaireCoutinho@julianHjessop Starting? Weakest company growth in decades... highest energy prices in the world... wage stagnation as fuck... and this clown says these things. He is a trojan horse.
@ClaireCoutinho@nigethugrug It's the exact opposite, they hope that those who don't understand the graph, don't ask AI to translate it into actual plain reading.
I’m starting to worry that the Labour Energy team can’t read.
This is not a report about jobs that only exist because of Net Zero.
A sizeable chunk of the jobs included are ‘waste and recycling’ and nuclear power. To state the obvious, we had those before Net Zero.
They aren’t explicit, but they appear to also include burning trees at Drax, which nobody thinks is green but which our Net Zero legislation forces us to do.
It also includes water monitoring and soil restoration - again, nothing to do with Net Zero.
It includes jobs which are not strictly a result of Net Zero, but ‘are not in conflict with it’ - for example, solar panels on roofs, or engineering consultancies. But again, there is no evidence that these jobs would not exist regardless. China, the world’s largest polluter, and the US, which doesn’t have a net zero target, have an abundance of clean tech jobs.
The problem is not clean tech, it is legislation which forces you to pick decarbonisation *when it does not work for the economy or living standards*.
If industries are paid through extremely expensive subsidies on everyone’s energy bills, of course they will be raising private capital - it’s a rent seekers’ paradise - but is that positive for the economy overall?
This is almost as bad as their ‘independent evidence’ that Clean Power 2030 would cut bills, which also turned out to be pure garbage.
For all of those repeating the Labour lines, please at least do the basics of reading the report.
When the Net Zero measure was laid before Parliament I asked for some sort of estimate of the cost of this measure.
In vain. There was none.
Who agrees to buy a house without agreeing the price?
https://t.co/ZCucHWGdHz
Ex Tory Prime Minister writes a post that could have been written by the Labour government’s Energy and Net Zero Secretary, Ed Miliband. The Uniparty blob synchronisation.
This report perfectly encapsulates Net Zero. Smoke and mirrors.
Of these "1m jobs" 234k are induced jobs from worker spending. Yes really.
Only 308,000 are direct NZ jobs and of those most existed long before NZ.
Bin men, landfill workers, insulation fitters and window manufacturers are all included.