𝐓𝐨𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐫𝐨𝐰, 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐠𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐬. ⏳🇮🇳
Just 1️⃣ day to go until Team India returns to the FIH HOCKEY PRO LEAGUE Rotterdam stage! 🏑🔥
Every match matters as India battles for crucial points against the world's top teams. And yes, the much-anticipated 🇮🇳 𝐈𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐚 𝐯𝐬 🇵🇰 𝐏𝐚𝐤𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧 clashes in London on 23rd and 26th are just around the corner. ⚔️
📺 Watch LIVE on Star Sports & JioHotstar
#HockeyIndia #IndiaKaGame #FIHProLeague #INDvsPAK
𝐇𝐨𝐜𝐤𝐞𝐲 𝐟𝐚𝐧𝐬, 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐨𝐧𝐞'𝐬 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐲𝐨𝐮. 👀🏑
𝐌𝐚𝐧𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐭 𝐒𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐡 has a special message as an action-packed June awaits Indian hockey fans. 🔥🇮🇳
From the FIH Pro League 2025–26 European Leg to the FIH Hockey Women’s Nations Cup 2026, Team India is set for two weeks of world-class hockey and unforgettable moments. 💙
Press play and get ready for the action. ▶️
📺 FIH Pro League 2025–26 European Leg: Watch LIVE on Star Sports & JioHotstar
📺 FIH Hockey Women’s Nations Cup 2026: Watch LIVE on the https://t.co/H82ERZwZhW app and website
#HockeyIndia #IndiaKaGame #FIHProLeague #FIHNationsCup
@ChhattisgarhCMO@CGPoliceDept what is going on...and what kind of behaviour of ur inspector...take action against said inspector as per law describe...
A person travelling with his wife & child stops for checking.He starts recording.Instead of accountability, he gets assaulted.Since when filming officials become a crime? If a camera threatens authority more than lawbreakers do,the problem isn't the citizen. Policing cannot mean intimidation & violence. @GargiRawat
MORE SHAME: now the WFI stops @Phogat_Vinesh from competing in the 53 kg category trials and tells her only this morning on the day of trials that she can compete only in 50 kg category! PURE VENDETTA being carried out against a world class athlete only because she took on the ‘ESTABLISHMENT’. Will anyone from GOI, sports ministry or our sporting fraternity speak up? No wonder we can never be a great Olympic nation: too much politics, too little sport.😡
I am a CBSE Class 12 student.
After receiving unexpectedly low marks in Physics, we applied for photocopies of my answer sheets through the CBSE reevaluation process.
Today we received the copies.
And I am shattered because the Physics answer sheet uploaded by CBSE is not mine
This is exactly what the USA ultimately wants, and we are doing it. It would not have happened if our diplomacy had maintained a balanced approach and continued working with Russia and Iran. Instead, we have chosen to align ourselves with the "fatherland."
#Trump_business
This is all because of the Media, which has never asked any serious questions about policies or the economy. They are just busy chanting “Modi Modi,” abusing opposition leaders, and calling them anti-national.
Main criminal Media...
#ImportantNews: Within days of 7 AAP Rajya Sabha MPs from Punjab shifting allegiance to the BJP, at least 3 politically sensitive matters connected to some of them came up before the Punjab and Haryana High Court, specifically, Chief Justice Sheel Nagu.
I’ve found that in two of these three cases, the High Court’s own listing process did not follow the ordinary roster. For instance:
1. In Sandeep Pathak’s case:
The case concerned Pathak who approached the High Court apprehending coercive action by the Punjab government.
During the hearing, the State said no coercive action would be taken without intimating the Court, but the written order records it as no coercive action without “prior permission” of the Court. The issue of maintainability was also not decided.
Interestingly, the High Court’s own March 2026 notified roster shows that the MP/MLA criminal matters are before Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya’s bench. However, this matter was listed before Chief Justice Nagu through a special administrative order. And a sweeping relief was granted.
2. In Rajinder Gupta’s case:
Gupta’s petition seeking security cover was somehow specifically listed before Chief Justice Nagu, even though similar matters were pending before Justice Jagmohan Bansal’s bench who also holds the roster. The Main case is CWP 12075-2026.
The High Court's order itself notes that the Ministry of Home Affairs had already provided security cover to Gupta in Punjab and Delhi yet the case was listed before a different bench for reasons unknown.
3. In the Trident case:
The third case is CWP-13613-2026, Trident Limited vs State of Punjab and Anr. This matter concerned a raid conducted on 30 April 2026 by officers of the Punjab Pollution Control Board. Trident, whose Chairman Emeritus is Rajinder Gupta, sought protection from coercive steps and also sought a direction that the seized samples be sent to a Central Testing Laboratory outside Punjab.
Although the roster originally remains with the Chief Justice's bench, the bench went out of the way to grant a relief by observing in the order that Trident’s apprehension that the raid stemmed from political vendetta appeared “reasonably palpable”. The Court ultimately directed that the Pollution Control Board could take coercive steps only after giving Trident 30 days to rectify minor deficiencies, even though the Water Rules only allow a 15-day notice period!
And this, after the bench itself took note of the Pollution Control Board’s objection that Trident had an alternative remedy before the National Green Tribunal. The bench also referred to Rule 32(6) of the Punjab Water Rules, under which prior hearing can be dispensed with where grave environmental injury is likely!
The Larger Issue
Take these three cases together. Three matters connected to AAP-to-BJP defectors reached the Chief Justice within a short span. At least two belonged before other roster benches. The matters were specially listed before Chief Justice Nagu by a Special Administrative Order. And in all three cases, the Court granted some form of protective relief, even sweeping in Pathak’s case which a opposition leader can only dream of getting.
The concern is not simply about the outcome of these cases. It is about the route by which they reached the Chief Justice, and the absence of a TRANSPARENT explanation for why these cases were so special that ordinary roster allocation did not apply!
The Chief Justice is the master of the roster, sure. But precisely because that power determines which judge hears which case, it carries a duty of VISIBLE neutrality. In politically sensitive matters, especially those involving recent defections from one party to another, even the appearance of selective listing can raise serious institutional questions.
The Pathak-Kejriwal Comparison
This is the most important part. Just compare Sandeep Pathak’s case before a High Court of a non-BJP state with Arvind Kejriwal’s case before the High Court of a BJP state, and you will see how different yardsticks apply in each.
In Pathak’s case, the designated roster judge for MP/MLA criminal matters very much existed. Yet, Chief Justice Nagu issued a special administrative order to list the matter before himself and then granted Pathak sweeping protection by converting prior intimation into a mandatory judicial pre-clearance before any action could be taken.
But in Kejriwal’s case before the Delhi High Court, the opposite happens. Despite serious and well-documented concerns of conflict of interest, bias, and unusual judicial attachment to the CBI appeal matter, the Chief Justice remains silent. The case is not withdrawn from that judge. It is not placed before a fresh bench.
The larger context too is hard to ignore. The Supreme Court’s INACTION and DELAY in the AAP vs LG constitutional crisis in Delhi and MVA government toppling in Maharashtra, and its ACTIVE intervention in Bengal’s SIR case, have produced political consequences that have greatly benefited the political fortunes of the same side.
Recently, CJI Surya Kant raised the sensitive issue of Punjab’s drug menace, observing that the “big fish” are not being caught by the State government. Punjab goes to polls in a matter of months. So can the timing be treated as accidental?
Each of these instances, viewed separately, may be explained away with a shrug. But look at them together, and a deeply disturbing pattern emerges.
It is this pattern---of SELECTIVE urgency, SELECTIVE silence, SELECTIVE roster control, and SELECTIVE intervention that corrodes public faith in the judiciary’s neutrality. Unfortunately, soon, citizens will begin to notice the growing weaponisation of the judiciary.
@askshivanisahu किसी के पास यह साहस नहीं है,की सरकार से इस पर सवाल पूछ ले कि क्या कमी आई?क्यों हर दूसरे तीसरे साल,लोग अपने गंतव्य को पलायन कर रहे हैं?लेकिन लोग यह जरूर कह दे रहे हैं कि तुमने स्वाद कैसे मांग लिया?हर चीज बहुत ज़रूरी है।जिसको नहीं मिल रहा है,उसको मिलना चाहिए।चाहे स्वाद हो, या रोटी।