Sunny Thomas

Advocate & Legal Consultant

[Kiran Bedi @thekiranbedi]

A significant responsibility towards Delhi.

Pursuant to the order of the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi, I shall “address the Court” and “assist the Court” in the #MCD matter, for the larger public interest, as an intervener in the PIL pending before the Court.

I am grateful to the Solicitor General of India for agreeing to my intervention before the Hon’ble Court.

The matter is now listed for hearing on 14 October 2026.

My sincere thanks to my counsel @thesunilgupta and his team for their assistance.

The endeavour is simple: to contribute constructively towards a more accountable, effective and citizen-centric MCD for Delhi.

[Sunny Thomas @Advsunnythomas]

@thekiranbedi @PMOIndia @HMOIndia @LtGovDelhi @gupta_rekha @mlkhattar @thesunilgupta Congratulations... Lets stand united for our city.

[Sunny Thomas @Advsunnythomas]

@TransportDelhi @dtptraffic @LtGovDelhi @CMODelhi @gupta_rekha Kindly start enforcement drive immediately from South Delhi

[Sunny Thomas @Advsunnythomas]

These kind of hunders of vehicles which are not road worthy can seen in Delhi roads everyday. TAIL LAMPs are mandatory under MVA. Why no enforcement of this in Delhi roads?? Who will answer here??

[Supriya Shrinate @SupriyaShrinate]

▪️June 2026: An economic Tsunami is coming.

Rahul Gandhi, Leader of Opposition

⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️

▪️September 2026 : Energy, food, fertiliser and financial crises are here.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

S Jaishankar, Minister of External Affairs

[Saurabh Bharadwaj @Saurabh_MLAgk]

कल की पूरी घटना का सच यह है:-

पहले प्रवेश वर्मा ने जरनैल सिंह को बुलाया और कहा कि 'जहाँ सड़क उखड़ रही है, मुझे दिखाइए।'
जब जरनैल सिंह ने सड़क को उखाड़कर दिखा दिया, तो मंत्री जी को गुस्सा आ गया और उन्होंने वीडियो बना रहे एक Gen Z को थप्पड़ मार दिया।

इसके तुरंत बाद वे पुलिस के पीछे छिपते हुए वहाँ से भाग खड़े हुए।

[Sunny Thomas @Advsunnythomas]

@NewspressX Yes.. He is the most honest CEC to his Boss.

[Sunny Thomas @Advsunnythomas]

@NewspressX Not is not even eligible for being a MLA. Wolf in Sheep's clothing...

[Sunny Thomas @Advsunnythomas]

@NBTDilli His frustration is expressed here. He is not competent for being a part of CM Rekha Gupta's team.

[Ankush Narang @AnkushNarang_]

दिल्ली में भाजपा सरकार के PWD मंत्री प्रवेश साहिब सिंह ने सवाल पूछने पर कैमरा चला रहे एक युवक को थप्पड़ मार दिया। क्या अब दिल्ली में भाजपा की सत्ता से सवाल पूछना भी गुनाह हो गया है?

दिल्ली सीएम रेखा गुप्ता से सवाल पूछने पर पुलिस मारती है और उन्हीं के मंत्री से सवाल किया तो मंत्री ने ��ुद युवक को थप्पड़ मार��।

लोकतंत्र में सवालों का जवाब थप्पड़ से नहीं, संवाद और जवाबदेही से दिया जाता है।

भाजपा सरकार को अपने मंत्री के इस व्यवहार पर तत्काल संज्ञान लेते हुए उन्हें पार्टी से निष्कासित करें। साथ ही मंत्री की गिरफ्तार हो।

@Saurabh_MLAgk @AtishiAAP @ipathak25 @AamAadmiParty @AAPDelhi

[Priyanka Kakkar @PKakkar_]

जरनैल भाई ने भाजपा का भ्रष्टाचार उजागर किया। एक आम आदमी ने इस घटना का रिकॉर्ड किया तो उसको परवेश वर्मा ने थप्पड़ मारा। क्या यही है भाजप�� का “जनसेवा मॉडल” जिसका ज्ञान मोदी जी 3 दिन पहले बांट रहे थे?

लोकतंत्र में जनता मालिक होती है। इन राक्षसों का अहंकार भी जनता जल्द दूर करेगी।

[Sunny Thomas @Advsunnythomas]

@Kumarjyoti49291 Ask to him to file a PIL about it. He is known for PIL...

[Sunny Thomas @Advsunnythomas]

@NewspressX 2

[Vala Afshar @ValaAfshar]

The body suit airbags are instantly launched to protect fallen motorcyclists

[Prashant Bhushan @pbhushan1]

आपको भरोसा है कि यही हुआ होगा?

[Saurav Das @SauravDassss]

🚨IMPORTANT NEWS🚨

Since Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar is in the news, I have some very important but sad news to share about a Supreme Court judge.

Supreme Court judge Justice Satish Chandra Sharma. Just two months away from retirement.

If you remember, the Allahabad High Court had imposed a penalty on Medha Roopam, the DM of Noida and daughter of Gyanesh Kumar with a fine of five lakh rupees for irrationally issuing NSA order against a student Activist for Noida labour protest.

That order was challenged before the Supreme Court of India. Live Law, the news portal, reported that Gyanesh’s daughter’s case was listed before Justice Satish Chandra Sharma out of turn and in violation of the Supreme Court roster and rules and convention. The challenge ought to have gone before Justice Nagarathna’s bench, known to be an independent upright judge.

Two days back, when the matter was listed for hearing, Justice Sharma‘s bench switched off the audio of the Supreme Court proceeding, which is highly unusual and almost never done. ALARMING. There was no explanation from the judge’s side as to why this extraordinary favour was done for Gyanesh’s daughter.

In any case the fine and the adverse remarks of the Allahabad High Court were stayed by Justice Sharma immediately.

Same day, in another case related to Gyanesh Kumar—the constitutional challenge that was filed against the 2023 law on election commissioners of India was finally decided by a two judge bench of which Justice Sharma was a part of.

Under challenge was the appointments procedure where the leader of opposition today holds only an ornamental seat in the Three-member selection committee that selects Election commissioner of India. The other two are PM and his Cabinet Minister. Justice Sharma dissented which led to a split verdict and the case has now been sent before the Chief Justice of India for constituting a larger bench. This has delayed the case by years probably. This split verdict itself came after three years. This is how the Supreme Court refuses to hear most important cases that affect our lives and the country.

A separate blanket immunity granted to past and present election commissioners of India by Modi’s government is also pending for last 9 months before CJI Surya Kant. Today, the Chief Election Commissioner has been exposed for gross illegalities and for stealing votes and elections at the behest of powers that be. Any sane, sorted, neutral, just person can see that the selection process of ECIs is not independent and tilted in govt’s favour. But not Justice Sharma.

And here’s the big news: his son holds not one, not two, but four big, plum government counsel panels, including income, tax department, GST, customs, and excise, and a Madhya Pradesh government lawyer panel. I need not explain the great perks and influence that come along when you hold such plum government panels. Read my Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma report where I exposed the same thing.

I am withholding the name of the son for now.

The important question is: how can a judge be expected to do impartial and fair Justice in politically sensitive cases if his family members serve at the pleasure of the government? The judge is also retiring two months later, and several lawyers have informed me that there are vacancies in NCLAT and other search plum tribunals.

I’M SORRY TO SAY such a system of judiciary does not inspire confidence in its ability to do impartial justice. There is a reason why the ethics code for judges require them to maintain a sense of aloofness and not do anything which can harm the their image and that of the judiciary.

Both in Justice Swarna Kanta’s case and several other judges case, including that of the Supreme Court, it is TRAGIC to notice the complete capture of the institution of the Indian judiciary. Can the judiciary go on like this?

[Harmeet Kaur K 🇮🇳 @iamharmeetK]

Time to ponder Gyanesh Kumar 's past

A suicide note by Malaysian contractor Lee See Been

Before Gyanesh Kumar became the Chief Election Commissioner of India, there was a disturbing chapter in his Kerala posting .

Gyanesh Kumar was a 1988-batch Kerala-cadre IAS officer served as Project Director of the Kerala State Transport Project (KSTP).

The KSTP involved Malaysian contractor PATI-BEL.
Lee See Been was chief project officer of PATI-BEL, working on the World Bank-aided KSTP.

In 2006, Lee See Been, the Malaysian project manager of the World Bank-aided Kerala State Transport Project, died by suicide.

In his suicide note, Lee See Been clearly named Gyanesh Kumar, who was PWD Secretary then and alleged that bribes were being demanded and that funds due to the project were being withheld and delayed.

This was not just a random allegation floating around years later.
It was an allegation recorded in the suicide note of the man at the centre of the project dispute.

Gyanesh Kumar was transferred.

Today, that same Gyanesh Kumar sits at the helm of the Election Commission of India and was entrusted with safeguarding the integrity of the electoral process.

How did an officer whose name appeared in a suicide note alleging bribery and withholding of funds eventually rise to become the custodian of India's elections?

https://t.co/psp13cAlI2

[Press Trust of India @PTI_News]

VIDEO | Delhi: Former Chief Election Commissioner SY Quraishi says, "Supreme Court in one judgment in 1995, TN Seshan versus the government, had very clearly said that Commission is not one person. The CEC Commission is three members and the act which was passed made it very clear that ideally, the decision should be taken unanimously. But in case of any disagreement, they should be taken by a majority decision. So, and there are two election commissioners versus the CEC can be the majority. So, the commission is the majority and the fact that the majority was not being taken into account and CEC was unilaterally taking action, they are all illegal. Very clearly it has come out that all those decisions illegal and any illegal decision should be undone and the guy should be held responsible for abuse of law and abuse of authority and playing havoc with India's democracy..."

(Full video available on PTI Videos - https://t.co/bIyFWTfmBd)

[Sunny Thomas @Advsunnythomas]

@DeshGujarat Terrible incident. Driver was either on Mobile Phone or inebriated... Requesting that action should not be based on any religion...

[Tamal Saha @Tamal0401]

Nandan Yadav - will anyone ask for his religion today? He has no right to wear that tilak or use the saffron. Just wanna ask @bihar_police - he is shot in an encounter and yet he managed to get a saffron scarf to cover his face - how? In an encounter situation that scarf stayed in place? Plz don’t tell us he was wearing it already before the encounter - if so, how did you recognise that it was Nandan? Post encounter, didn’t u open the scarf to check if he was Nandan? And if so - why and who would drape that scarf around him in such perfection? He has no right to use saffron for any kind of shield! Also - where are the bulldozers?