Indians found this post, and I dont have time to tell every single one of them personally to go back to india, but rest assured, I would.
They obviously do not like hearing the fact that their country expelled people that were unwanted, since regardless of their delusional gloating, they understand that they are unwanted in our countries and can be expelled just the same, regardless of the "roots" they feel they have.
While what some of the say is true, that specific brits were allowed to remain behind, and that the OFFICIAL policy as presented to the world was that brits were allowed to stay, non-indians in india after independence enjoy a state of almost non-personhood. You cant own a businesses, you cant own property, you cant own farmland, you have no freedom of religion, no freedom of expression, no employment protections, no protection of your language, and, one of the most interesting considering a lot of their cries were about the "british" schools, no right to administer an education institution. Many of these ANTI-RIGHTS are explicitly written into the indian constitution, and very obviously aimed at pushing out the british after independence.
This says nothing about the violence condoned against british after independence. While ghandi himself may have lead a "non violent" revolution (lol, ok), the same cannot be said of the many 70iq indians who saw their newfound independence as a reason to be cruel to people who were legally now an unpersoned caste of people. The implicit threat of violence against the british in the wake of independence made the british no longer feel welcome in their home.
And so again, after 300 years, these british people packed their bags and went home. Colonial india had, at its peak, about 300k british people living there. 20 years after independence, this number dropped to about 7500. In a country 511 million.
I am absolutely all for, on paper, saying indians can stay in the west, but in reality making them nonpersons and legally discriminating against them to the point that only the best of the best, hand selected 0.0001% of our population remains indian.
After all, its only fair, thats what india did to its colonizers. But knowing indians, theyll cry and whine and moan anyway, "SAAR ITS NOT FAIR SAAR I WENT TO HARVARD NEW DEHLI UPSTAIRS JAVA AND BHANGRA DANCING COLLEGE SAAR I AM BRAHMIN SAAR LOOK AT MY LIGHTER POOP COLOR SKINS SAAR YOU MUST LET ME STAY SAAR".
Fuck em.
Elon could literally solve homelessness tomorrow.
All he needs to do is sell his stake in the companies he created from the ground up, crashing the price and evaporating his wealth as well as the savings and pensions of workers globally.. handing the control of these companies over to short term profit interests and preventing any long term vision from being enacted..
THEN take whatever money that remains which will be nowhere near 1tn and give it to homeless charities who have never solved homelessness anywhere on earth because they’re financially incentivised to do the opposite.
Bam - homelessness solved.
The reason he doesn’t do any of this is because he’s evil.
This is the first case of its kind in UK criminal justice history.
A Derbyshire officer allegedly used AI to fabricate evidential material across multiple cases not one. The Crown Prosecution Service is now reviewing every conviction those cases touched.
Three days ago, the UK government announced PoliceAI.
£140 million. a national AI centre for policing. 40 new facial recognition vans. AI tools for every force in England and Wales by 2027. the official goal: "get responsible AI into the hands of officers."
Three days later: criminal investigation into an officer for using AI to manufacture evidence.
the interim director of PoliceAI put out a statement today.
"our work is rooted in transparency."
97% of all criminal investigations in the UK now involve digital evidence. that's this year's figure.
AI is already being used to summarise case files, triage evidence, and assist with disclosure.
one officer already used it to manufacture evidence across multiple cases.
nobody noticed until now.
@Heliotrophy Sometimes I lie to myself and pretend I won't pause the battle to figure out what the hell is going on. And then my 20 reinforcements come in with Yarl Balgruf and the 5 different RoR I emergency recruited.
If I had Musk's trillion, I'd actually spend it on something useful, like developing reusable rockets to make space travel cheap instead of just hoarding it all.
“The color of their skin” is one of the biggest psyops of all time. It’s equivalent to pretending people avoid murder hornets because of an aesthetic dispreference for black and yellow markings
No, the markings are what tell me they are MURDER HORNETS
This is why it's so important to Actually Be Racist. Indians and Africans are not human. "Full stop." You have to put your foot down there, or else you leave yourself vulnerable to this kind of rhetoric that appeals to "human dignity," "human rights," etc
No. Indians are not human. Africans are not human. They are separate, distinct life forms from us and they occupy a lower tier of moral worth. That is the truth and we have to be honest and insist on it and stand by it or we will never be able to deal with them as an existential problem (3.5 billion of these life forms, btw)
Even most "racists" don't actually "get" racism. "Racism" is not a utilitarian calculation along the lines of: "blacks and Indians produce lower economic output and are culturally different from us, therefore they're undesirable." Racism is: blacks and Indians are intrinsically, biologically 'Not Us,' and so they're inferior and hostile insofar as they pose a threat to us and our interests
You have to Actually Be Racist. There's no shortcut or way to squeamishly avoid it. There are 3.5 billion of these things (and that's *only* subcons and blacks) and their numbers increase every day
Much like how an insurgent dismantles an unexploded aerial bomb to create IEDs, a dissident will dissect the propaganda used against them to create a memetic weapon for their own benefit.
And no matter how subtle, complex, or layered a propagandist writer is, they'll always fail at lessening the impact that truth has on the conscious instinct. They're trapped by the imposition of being forced to include a truth in their media in order to subvert it, forever doomed to flacid attempts at trying to diminish that truth and obscure its presence in their work.
Semanticists like you will always blindly stumble around the point, "but the movie said dis guy sucks" you'll declare because you assume everyone gets told what they're supposed to think the same way you do. Actual sentient people can process elements of art reflecting the nuggets of truth embedded in an imperfect creation. Movies, books, and other longform media are rarely ever valid or relevant as a whole, they've always meant to be delivery mechanisms for a few key excerpts and moments that stick with the audience.
Please don't use these events to demonize an entire group of people, rioting is just the voice of the unheard, I don't think they have mate, this is just part of living in a big city, maybe this wouldn't have happened if they had adequate housing, etc...