@ShriSiva_@CDEccleshare@Carra23 Think you might have missed my second point. I said Chelsea were disliked but I think it was more to do with the characters involved than the methods employed.
@CDEccleshare@Carra23 and ii) the people involved were generally quite unlikeable- Mourinho, Terry, Drogba. It is ii) that makes City and Chelsea different.
@CDEccleshare@Carra23 I think @Carra23’s point is why didn’t/don’t people mind Chelsea in the same way you say about City. For me the answer to that is two-fold: i) they don’t care that much in principle for the same reason - they bought the success so it’s quite easy to dismiss (identical to city;
@MrQLD@rafi4999 Out of interest, which Aus team in the last 15 years is worse than this one? I think he’s probably right about both teams. That just shows how good aus have been over the years and how average England have been. Even when you dip and we peak, it’s no real contest.