@VegiXD@JaeSambo Historic documents prove they didn’t believe in equality. The union was split in 3 factions bc of it. One of those was “abolitionist”, which made up of only 8% of union soldiers. That means 92% of Yt soldiers made it clear they wasn’t fighting for slaves.
@VegiXD@JaeSambo Stop telling the lie that yt people fought to free us. Lincoln: “if I could save the union without freeing the slaves I would” They freed us to save the union, not bc it was moral . Y’all are trying to white your sins without the work
@MotorcycleBread It’s not about what I think honestly. I look at it like, Zimmerman went free, Kyle rittenhouse went free. In a system where those exist, then Karmelo has a chance to go free also. It’s either they’re all guilty or all innocent.
@MotorcycleBread 21 witnesses from the prosecution, saying things like “it wasn’t self defense” or “Karmelo was the aggressor,” with not ONE objection from the defense. So yeah.. But If the jury lacks diversity, only one group is deciding what’s reasonable. That’s not right.
@MotorcycleBread It’s because self defense in tx all depends on what’s “reasonable.” Another word for feelings. Thats why yts get off in the same situations as these when it’s a black victim. They don’t value black life and they show it every time.
@MotorcycleBread Austin had an 85lb difference on Karmelo. It can absolutely be seen as reasonable of him to fear of serious injury, or death. And stop cherry picking what u want to see. It’s “SERIOUS INJURY or death.” And yep, why free one and not the other?.. We know why
@MotorcycleBread It’s fear of serious bodily injury, or death. Being that Austin was twice Karmelo’s size, and the fact he assaulted Karmelo gives him a strong claim of self defense in tx. “Reasonable” is subjective. That’s why a diverse jury was crucial in this trial.
@BizzNessGuy1 Yeah the media did a good job of painting Karmelo as the aggressor, when he didn’t speak, stand up to, or touch Austin first . But that’s Texas for you.
@Brandmorn57 Shove or no shove, you don’t have to be touched in tx to claim self defense. You just need fear of bodily harm, or life. The tent is school property, not either student. To charge Karmelo w murder you have to prove he wasn’t fearful of these things
@Sabs_2084 Notice I said “YOU DONT HAVE TO BE TOUCHED” to claim self defense in tx. You only have to be fearful of bodily harm or your life. To charge Karmelo w murder you have to prove he wasn’t in fear of those things. The law is all that matters. Not your feelings
@CM1559845 Totally different situation. Kyle drove to a whole other state with a gun he WASN’T legally allowed to carry. That alone shows it was premeditated. On top of that, the judge dismissed his weapon charge, which was absolutely diabolical. Not even remotely close
@CM1559845 I’ve done nothing but state facts. And notice I never said it was race. You did. But thanks for pointing out the key factor in both the verdicts. One was wrong, and it wasn’t Karmelo. Yet, Kyle was set free. Crazy world we live in