Today i have tested Claude Opus 4.8 VS Codex GPT 5.5 VS GLM 5.2 vs MiniMax M3 to revamp our website. I Provided the same prompt but GLM 5.2 out perform in design beside it lacks in vision capabilities.
Complete video is coming soon, so stay tuned.
Introducing GLM-5.2: Frontier Intelligence, Open Weights
- Significant improvements in coding and agentic tasks
- Strong long-horizon capabilities with a 1M context window
- Two levels of reasoning effort: GLM-5.2 (max) pushes the limits, while GLM-5.2 (high) strikes a strong balance between performance and token efficiency
- MIT-licensed open weights
- Same API pricing as GLM-5.1
Tech Blog: https://t.co/LAsxUdN0JZ
Weights: https://t.co/g0A1C4UWx4
API: https://t.co/Kc3E22cbN7
Coding Plan: https://t.co/Nk8Y98HNhU
Chat: https://t.co/WCqWT0qCQb
@cyrilXBT Checkout my comparison where GLM 5.2 is outperforming beside laking in vision capabilities. detailed video is coming soon at my profile so stay tuned.
@nutlope it's insane. in my last video i just focused on reasoning as well as for back-end development but after watching your demo i am thinking to record another review video about GLM 5.2 use case in design.
@HarveenChadha Actually it depends on the requirements but now we have the more options that we can rely on open weight models as compared to proprietary models.
@noobnooc it's true it's not cheap as with the launch of GLM 5 series, they instantly increase their prices. And previously they claimed 5x of Claude pro in Lite Plan but now they also removed this line. Actually everyone wants $$$
@markproduct Still ai models didn't have human level critical thinking. In many cases we observed AI agents are good but they are stuck so here humans come up with ideas or solutions and AI gets rid from pooling.