@imbheem@TheKhelIndia@himantabiswa Aren't multipurpose good because you can also make revenue using events and all to fund the sport ?
I think those are better
@AltEpikxeuxy@wHite_tuL1p might be the case my bad.
But still i saw venka getting 150 ping and 3/5 of jp roster getting 40 at minimum so i took some averages i guess.
@llll_nau@gemzan3tti@wHite_tuL1p at this point bro no-one on this earth can make sense with you. India were late (we were not you can check at Indian players twitter), you were "only" playing at 80 (we were at 120 but okay sure bro),etc. I guess Jp was scared to give india the 5 ping advantage so they took 40.
@llll_nau@gemzan3tti@wHite_tuL1p its impossible to make the ping the same. Good you are absolutely right.
So what do we do according to you?
We make both of them play at equal ping which is around 50 - 60 or make one play on 40 and one on 100?
@llll_nau@gemzan3tti@wHite_tuL1p I am talking in ping not ping difference
0-10ping - cool
11-40 - playable
40 - 60 - bad
60 - 80 - very bad
80-120 - India
People playing in the range 0 - 50 is PLAYABLE above that is not.
Ping difference between 30 and 50 is like 10 times less than 40 and 100 ping.
no hate.
@llll_nau@gemzan3tti@wHite_tuL1p bro have you ever played Valorant (not iron at least ascendent) at 40 , 80 & 120? If not , no point discussing this with you. The game is unplayable at 50+ ping and India was playing at near 100. All you have is speculation that Japan "Would" have won .
@llll_nau@gemzan3tti@wHite_tuL1p you have to be stupid on another level to say
"Bro i saw the ping going down to 80 so they are playing fine and the ping fluctuating to 120 does not matter as i saw that at one point it was 80". LOL.
@GlobalEsportsIn@XLG_Valorant The amount of throwing the players did lead to this. We know that the players want the most to win but idk how they were able to throw this much.