Agoristfurry2

[Agoristfurry2 @Agoristfurry2]

@Intoleranttleft @Agoristfurry @DracoMycete @deadh0es Dora looks, and talks like a fictional character, you're just a mongoloid who can't separate fiction from reality. Nice kafka trap, and duck test fallacy having traits we associate with something doesn't mean you could definitively say it's that thing.
https://t.co/WmmXNZ18fa

[Agoristfurry2 @Agoristfurry2]

@Intoleranttleft @Agoristfurry @DracoMycete @deadh0es You cannot adequately say someone is a pedophile just because they have certain debate opinions that you disagree with. This is a kafka trap, and I'm not even that big of a fan of that kind of content, I just defend those who are because I dislike false accusations.

[Agoristfurry2 @Agoristfurry2]

@Intoleranttleft @Agoristfurry @DracoMycete @deadh0es At least in the context of the debate they can't be children, Dora IS a child in universe, good thing we were never talking about fictional characters in an in universe context and teh debate was never about characters in that context this entire time.

[Agoristfurry2 @Agoristfurry2]

@Intoleranttleft @Agoristfurry @DracoMycete @deadh0es All you saying the last part tells me is that you think people have to fit in with the general societal opinion, and you get all your opinions from peer pressure, and the only response you really have are ad populum fallacies. You're a slave.

[Agoristfurry2 @Agoristfurry2]

@Intoleranttleft @Agoristfurry @DracoMycete @deadh0es You only blocked because I destroyed your arguments, you have no actual argument against what I said outside saying nuh uh and throwing a tantrum like a toddler, and you are just coping.

[Agoristfurry2 @Agoristfurry2]

@Intoleranttleft @Agoristfurry @Toywhore1312 @DracoMycete @deadh0es Yeah, someone who wants to preserve freedom of expression, and artistic freedom, and the creation of anything fictional, and not wanting to censor any piece of fiction, or harass people for consuming fiction that I'm uncomfortable with, and not liking libel or thought crimes.

[Agoristfurry2 @Agoristfurry2]

@Intoleranttleft @Agoristfurry @DracoMycete @deadh0es I don't think there's a more pathetic thing to do than to make up fantasies about people and accusing them of this shit all over internet discourse, and what people defend.

[Agoristfurry2 @Agoristfurry2]

@Intoleranttleft @Agoristfurry @Toywhore1312 @DracoMycete @deadh0es Nope, tehy still can't definitionally, morally, and logically due to what I said before.

[Agoristfurry2 @Agoristfurry2]

@Intoleranttleft @Agoristfurry @DracoMycete @deadh0es Drawings/objects also don't have agency and moral rights, aren't alive, aren't conscious, don't actually exist, and don't have the ability to be animate. Drawings/objects and organisms like children aren't comparable in any way, in any scenario.

[Agoristfurry2 @Agoristfurry2]

@Intoleranttleft @Agoristfurry @DracoMycete @deadh0es NONE of the reasons why being attracted to and jerking off to children is bad applies to drawings/objects in any way. You can't rape, hurt, victimize, exploit, have sex with, or violate the rights of a drawing/object unlike a child, or even really talk with one.

[Agoristfurry2 @Agoristfurry2]

@Intoleranttleft @Agoristfurry @DracoMycete @deadh0es Nope, it just means that the age is entirely arbitrary, I made zero excuses for pedophiles, and pedophiles won't even make the kinds of arguments I would make, they don't even get off to loli content, and aren't attracted to/can't satisfy their urges with them

[Agoristfurry2 @Agoristfurry2]

@Intoleranttleft @Agoristfurry @DracoMycete @deadh0es Nope, she doesn't actually have an age outside an in universe context, which is exclusively the context this debate is about for the reasons I mentioned.

[Agoristfurry2 @Agoristfurry2]

@Khaosxx228 @TrulyAmFromMars @Agoristfurry @Chaosxx227 But he's such a thin skinned pussy with his circular reasoning, and confirmation bias being so fragile that he locked the thread at the first sign of opposition.

[Agoristfurry2 @Agoristfurry2]

@Khaosxx228 @TrulyAmFromMars @Agoristfurry @Chaosxx227 The hilarious part is that he locked the thread when the ONLY ONES arguing against those stupid arguments before it was locked was JackingmyLantern, LMAO. There was literally only other user arguing against that stupid thread before I popped in.

[Agoristfurry2 @Agoristfurry2]

@TrulyAmFromMars @Agoristfurry @Chaosxx227 You want to see different arguments and are tired of the same arguments made constantly? THEN MAKE DIFFERENT ARGUMENTS YOURSELF.

[Agoristfurry2 @Agoristfurry2]

@TrulyAmFromMars @Agoristfurry @Chaosxx227 And the shit said is still correct, also the ONLY REASON why the same things keep being said over and over again by us is because YOU GUYS keep making the same arguments over and over again as well, and we respond to those same arguments with the same responses.

[Agoristfurry2 @Agoristfurry2]

@SparrowsBread @Agoristfurry BTW, depictions are NOWHERE in the criteria for pedophilic disorder, only attraction to children, and fictional characters still can't be children, so even if you were right...it doesn't help your wider point at all.
https://t.co/MCVwN06iPU

[SparrowsBread @SparrowsBread]

@Agoristfurry @Jaqqo_Lantern @ballsmcgee000 @allison84295775 @TrulyAmFromMars its a drawing depicting a child, and someone is jerking off to said child, they are a pedophile and you are defending them

[Agoristfurry2 @Agoristfurry2]

@SparrowsBread @Agoristfurry I would LOVE for you to try to make a moral case against jerking off to any sort of fictional content that doesn't just amount to thought crimes or victimless crimes. Good luck!