@BlackLabelAdvsr Not really.
But Christ is disgusted with people falsely claiming to speak for him, while elevating the legacy of a deceased partisan weirdo, over Himself.
@SpringV82@elimcgowan@WassonWatch Because the people who did that are evil.
And I’d think for anyone with a functioning moral compass, it should go without saying that we should be set our standards a little higher than “well, the terrorists did it, too”
@howertonjosh@mikeabadir This is a terrible take.
Romans 13 is not a “command” to the state that they execute people (let alone that they do so via public livestream).
@LadyPatriot05@howertonjosh Incorrect.
Also, might I suggest that if your bio says “Jesus first, but…”
Well, there’s a saying about “everything before the ‘but’”
@howertonjosh@NickJFreitas@alisa_childers Josh- you share your views widely, both on podcasts and on Twitter.
Why is it that you think anyone has a responsibility to reach out to you quietly and privately, prior to expressing disagreement with your public opinions?
I’m curious what you’re basing that upon?
@dutchdalton992@janecoaston It’s not, though
He implied nothing at all about Natalie
The only thing he implied is that rather than actually do his job and deal with reality, Trump prefers hanging out with young attractive women who tell him what he wants to hear
There is no implication of sex from ossoff