MOST AI PROMPTS ARE USELESS.
They sound impressive until you try using them in an actual business.
I build prompts that produce finished work:
• Customer replies
• Proposals
• Follow-ups
• SOPs
• Meeting notes
• Weekly reviews
• Cash snapshots
Every prompt is tested against a real task.
No “act as an expert” filler.
No 47-step prompt engineering theater.
No pretending AI can run your company.
Just practical systems that take work off your plate.
Follow if your business has outgrown keeping everything in your head.
that’s cool! meanwhile gpt-5.6 will be available through july 19… and july 20… and beyond. we’d rather not turn model availability into a guessing game.
oh, and it’s also absurdly token efficient. better performance at 36% the cost 😮💨
go have fun building. or don’t. it’s the weekend. touch grass instead. we’ll be here when you’re ready!
I wonder what it’s like to be someone who has one idea and just focuses on it until it’s successful.
Couldn’t be me. I’m over here juggling 8 projects at once.
I probably need to spend some time and wire up a personal assistant at this point?
Maybe I’ll make a Jarvis.
I can’t wait to see where all the projects end up over the next few months.
How do my ADHD peeps deal with this? It’s like my brain says, “This new idea is important too. Don’t lose it.” 🤣
Then I spend 3 hours spiraling into that idea.
Anyway… I just had another idea.
See what I mean?
I should build an app for that 🫠
What’s one thing that’s actually helped you stay focused?
IF ANTHROPIC WON’T LISTEN TO COMPLAINTS.
THEY’LL LISTEN TO CANCELLATIONS.
I already cancelled Claude.
Fable 5 was the reason many of us paid. Without it, the subscription no longer earns its place—especially when GPT-5.6 offers more in one package.
If you subscribed for Fable 5, don’t quietly accept the downgrade:
Cancel your plan.
Post the confirmation.
Tag @AnthropicAI.
Use #BringBackFable5.
One complaint gets ignored.
A cancellation wave gets measured.
Bring back Fable 5—or lose the customers who came for it.
IF ANTHROPIC WON’T LISTEN TO COMPLAINTS.
THEY’LL LISTEN TO CANCELLATIONS.
I already cancelled Claude.
Fable 5 was the reason many of us paid. Without it, the subscription no longer earns its place—especially when GPT-5.6 offers more in one package.
If you subscribed for Fable 5, don’t quietly accept the downgrade:
Cancel your plan.
Post the confirmation.
Tag @AnthropicAI.
Use #BringBackFable5.
One complaint gets ignored.
A cancellation wave gets measured.
Bring back Fable 5—or lose the customers who came for it.
Today is the LAST DAY Fable 5 is in Claude subscriptions.
I didn’t cancel Claude because it’s bad.
I cancelled because Anthropic removed the only reason I was still paying for it.
Fable 5 was the advantage.
Without it, GPT-5.6 gives me more power, better image and video tools, and a far better mobile experience—all in one subscription.
Anthropic didn’t just remove a model.
It removed the reason to stay.
My subscription is already cancelled.
Bring back Fable 5, or watch more customers realize they don’t need the plan without it.
Your move, @AnthropicAI.
Today is the LAST DAY Fable 5 is on Claude subscriptions.
So let me be direct with Anthropic:
GPT 5.6 is way better than Opus 4.8.
Without Fable 5, there is nothing on your subscription worth paying for.
I have 4 Claude Max subscriptions. $800 a month.
If Fable 5 is not brought back, I cancel all of them immediately.
Your move.
Conor, with respect, you did seem noticeably off. Your eyes looked unfocused, your thoughts appeared scattered, and you seemed distracted by something no one else could see.
I’m not claiming to know the cause or trying to diagnose you but that didn’t look like the Conor McGregor people recognize.
I genuinely hope you’re okay and have good people around you checking in.
AI JUST LEFT THE SCREEN. NOW IT’S HEADING FOR THE SHOP FLOOR.
Mistral just introduced Robostral Navigate—an 8-billion-parameter AI model that lets robots navigate factories, warehouses, offices and outdoor spaces using plain-English instructions.
The breakthrough is how little hardware it needs:
• One ordinary RGB camera
• No LiDAR
• No depth sensors
• No multi-camera array
Give it an instruction like:
“Leave the lobby, follow the corridor, enter the supply room and stop facing the second shelf.”
The model looks through the camera, decides where to move and adjusts when people or unexpected obstacles enter its path.
According to Mistral, Robostral achieved a 76.6% success rate in previously unseen environments.
That reportedly beats the leading single-camera system by 9.7 percentage points—and systems using depth sensors or multiple cameras by 4.5 points.
The real breakthrough may not be building more complicated robots.
It may be creating intelligence good enough to make simpler, cheaper robots useful.
Mistral trained the model entirely in simulation using approximately 400,000 trajectories across 6,000 virtual environments. Its new training method reportedly reduced the required tokens by 22×, turning experiments that could have taken months into runs completed in days.
The possible applications are obvious:
• Warehouse deliveries
• Equipment inspections
• Inventory scanning
• Security patrols
• Jobsite documentation
• Moving tools and materials
Robostral doesn’t give a robot human hands or teach it to perform skilled work.
It gets the machine where it needs to go.
Automation probably won’t begin by replacing the best worker in the building. It will begin by absorbing the walking, carrying, checking and documenting surrounding that worker’s actual skill.
That’s what operators should watch.
The first generation of AI learned to speak.
The next learned to see.
Now it’s learning to move.
AI is no longer waiting inside the chat window.
It’s heading down the aisle.
Like, follow and share for practical AI built for operators—not hype.
Source: Mistral AI
The biggest story in the market this week wasn’t the S&P making new highs.
It was Korea.
While Wall Street celebrated another bullish week, the KOSPI briefly entered a bear market as Samsung and SK hynix unraveled before staging a sharp rebound.
That’s not just a Korea story.
It’s the AI memory trade telling us something important.
Demand is still there.
Confidence is becoming fragile.
In today’s State of the Market, I break down why Seoul has become one of the most important leading indicators for U.S. semiconductors, why Treasury yields still matter more than most traders admit, and why the next few sessions could define the rest of the summer rally.
Read the full article below.
Proof, not hype.
@TheBenchTrades
We just finished stress-testing 40 AI stocks using THE BENCH v17.
No hype.
No favorites.
Every name had to compete for capital.
Only five consistently rose to the top:
① $NVDA
② $ANET
③ $VRT
④ $ETN
⑤ $GOOGL
The biggest surprise?
The winners weren’t necessarily the companies with the loudest headlines. They were the businesses with the strongest combination of leadership, institutional sponsorship, execution, and long-term durability.
AI is no longer one trade.
It’s becoming a competition for quality.
Full breakdown in the article.
Follow @TheBenchTrades for the remaining battle tests as we work through all 50 names.
Proof, not hype.
If you’re an active verified member of the Fin𝕏 community and regularly engage with my content, I want to support you.
Drop your account below and use this post to connect with others.
Stay blessed 𝕏 fam.
ChatGPT—and it’s not particularly close.
Claude’s Fable 5 is still the best model overall, but it’s too expensive, especially with GPT-5.6 Sol closing the gap.
Claude also has no built-in image or video generation, and ChatGPT’s mobile app is light-years ahead.
I can simply do far more from my phone with ChatGPT than I can with Claude. If I’m only paying for one subscription, versatility wins.
All of this coming from someone who still chooses Claude over Chat when I need it right.
MOST OF WALL STREET’S FAVORITE AI STOCKS FAILED THIS TEST.
Dozens entered.
Only THREE earned an A-tier grade for new capital:
🥇 $GOOGL
🥈 $PLTR
🥉 $ORCL
Not $NVDA.
Not $AMD.
Not $MU.
The complete rankings—and exactly where these three become buys—are in the post below.
You’re going to want this watchlist before Monday. 👇
Like. Repost. Follow @TheBenchTrades for proof-first trade research.
THE AI REVIEW BATTLE TEST FOUND THREE A-GRADE STOCKS
Dozens of AI stocks entered the review.
Only three earned an A-tier grade for new capital:
🥇 $GOOGL — A
🥈 $PLTR — A
🥉 $ORCL — A-
That does not mean blindly buying all three at Monday’s open.
The grade identifies the quality of the opportunity. The chart still determines the entry.
$GOOGL — THE BEST RISK/REWARD
Google finished first because the AI thesis is finally moving beyond spending and into monetization.
Search remains an extraordinary cash engine. Cloud gives Google direct exposure to enterprise AI demand. Gemini creates opportunities across Search, Workspace, advertising and developer tools.
The important distinction is valuation.
Unlike several AI leaders already priced for near-perfect execution, Google still offers a combination of durable cash flow, dominant distribution and multiple ways to win.
THE BENCH VERDICT: A
The trade: Buy only if the chart confirms strength or gives a controlled pullback. This is the strongest candidate for new capital—not permission to chase any opening gap.
$PLTR — THE STRONGEST PURE SOFTWARE LEADER
Palantir has what most AI software companies are still trying to prove:
Real customers.
Real revenue.
Real operating leverage.
Real institutional demand.
Its advantage is not simply building another model. Palantir helps governments and businesses put AI into production where decisions, security and execution matter.
That makes the company unusually difficult to replace once embedded.
The problem is no longer business quality. It is entry quality.
THE BENCH VERDICT: A
The trade: Wait for consolidation or a clean reset. PLTR remains one of the strongest companies in the group, but paying any price for strength turns a great business into a weak trade.
$ORCL — THE QUIET AI INFRASTRUCTURE WINNER
Oracle is no longer just the legacy database company traders remember.
OCI has become a serious AI infrastructure platform, supported by cloud demand, data-center expansion and Oracle’s enormous installed enterprise base.
It occupies an attractive position between compute infrastructure and the corporate data AI systems need to become useful.
The market has started recognizing that shift—but the opportunity remains more balanced than many higher-multiple infrastructure names.
THE BENCH VERDICT: A-
The trade: Favor accumulation during consolidation. ORCL is buyable on controlled weakness, not after an emotional momentum candle.
THE REST OF THE BOARD
High quality, wrong timing:
$MSFT
$AVGO
$TSM
$ASML
$LITE
Not currently earning fresh capital:
$MU
$AMD
$AMAT
$LRCX
$ALAB
$CRWV
$INTC
That does not mean every stock in the second group is a bad company.
It means capital has better places to compete right now.
THE BOTTOM LINE
If deploying new AI capital today, the order is:
$GOOGL — best overall risk/reward
$PLTR — strongest software leader, wait for consolidation
$ORCL — quieter infrastructure opportunity, accumulate on weakness
The strongest stock is not always the loudest stock.
And an A grade is not permission to abandon discipline.
Quality chooses the watchlist.
Price chooses the trade.
Proof, not hype.
—
@TheBenchTrades
Not financial advice. Educational only.