@BramVanroy For corpus size, I think 100K sentences is enough in many cases. However, looking at the wiki dumps in sw, it only has around 40k sentences. It is also can form a good vocabulary for XNLI task.
@BramVanroy Another route is also practical. You can first get BPE codes and then get the vocabulary. Now you can adjust the BPE size according the minimum counts of tokens. Look at the original BPE GitHub. Rico may suggest this way.
@BramVanroy I swear I’ve read a title about BPE size, but I just cannot recall the name. However, instead of BPE size, I think considering the minimum counts of BPE codes is a general solution. (1/2)
@delliott Neurips and ICLR allow rebuttal revisions. However, not every reviewer and AC buy it and may comment like “should be included in the initial revision”. So I think it does not change the whole thing. Actually, I’m interested in the email saying “don’t explicitly disallow”.
@zhuoran_yang@NeurIPSConf Really? I think authors are excluded in this phase unless a reviewer manually set the reader of the comment. But I’m not sure it is possible.
@AlexFengLiu1@Ramy_E_Ali@NeurIPSConf Sad. A reviewer posted a very short comment titled with "Most issues clear" and promised to raise the score before ddl once back home from a trip. But I can't see it now. I don't know if the reviewer keeps the words.