@PJBuckley451@bennyjohnson@FCC Yes and No. They have the right to decided to block as is their right as a company, but they use a Public Channel and the President has a right to use those Public Channels to address the nation.
So blocking it would be in violation of the FCC agreement to use a Public Channel.
@Dromas5583071@RazorFist Welp nows the time for Dems to get rid of him before Arizona goes back to having a Republican Governor and that Governor gets to chose who replaces his senator seat.
@JosephBenn1725@RazorFist They are cleaning house.
They sit on this shit for years until they need a change and suddenly a scandal comes out and they are conveniently changed.
In Ruben's case right now is the best time to get rid of him before they lose the Governor race in Arizona.
@jasonjwilde Yes, had the ref not given the Yellow to Paredes, VAR would not be able to ask the ref to review the play under Mistaken Identity, and since Mistaken Identity was invoked the yellow card is reversed goes to the player who committed Simulation.
@Mhozz@Jacobtheclipper Mistaken Identity doesnt care where the play happened, it only cares about if a player got Mistakenly got cautioned or sent off.
Had the Argentina player not been given a Yellow, VAR wouldn't have been able to ask the ref to review the incident.
@Mhozz@Jacobtheclipper Except that its not against the rules as this was one of the new rules implemented starting this World Cup, VAR Principle 1d Mistaken Identity.
Plus its not the first time it was used this World Cup as the rule was used in the US vs Paraguay match.
@uyfoa@kangminlee It is not the first time they applied it though. The first time was against the Paraguay player in the US vs Paraguay match.
If the Ref didnt yellow card Argentina for that foul, VAR wouldnt have been able to overturn it and give the yellow to the Swiss.
@Nerdrotics It should flop for what they are doing to this story but it wont.
2 billion dollar idea will probably be just under 1 billion.
So it wont flop but it wont make what it should have and it will still make plenty that its considered a success.
@Mimi_Shoki@skpywatts58832 Either three ways, she or a person close to her saw it in the local news.
He bragged about it to a friend that friend told his wife and his wife told the divorcees wife.
And the most likely one is he called her after it happened to gloat that he won and she cant have any of it.
@DeagoDarth@ComfyCozyDaddy@CalvinGregory70@skpywatts58832 New Mexico allows you to pay with a debit card. There are daily and weekly limits to paying with a debit card. I cant remember how much it is off the top of my head, I just know its not alot.
@QuantumGuard17 It took me two seconds to find Florida Statute 800.03 which states that a person commits unlawful exposure of a sexual organ in vulgar or indecent manner it is a first degree misdemeanor, punishable by 1 year jail time or $1000 fine.
So yes it is illegal.
@JackPosobiec Problem is, that doesnt actually bother them.
It is their Fantasy. They dream about it. They role play it. They read and watch that series over and over while salivating.
@ItRainedMilk@GPrime85 Also eternally they knew it didnt do good cause they changed things in Endgame because of it.
Originally she was going to have a more definitive role in Endgame and she was instead reduced to a titular role.