VN - AK19 • Law

[VN - AK19 • Law @Ak19_Lft]

@jun639553 Một thằng Hàn Nô cho hay :)) nhà vua nên chúng m sợ sao ? Hay là cảm thấy k ăn được nên lấy cớ rút lui

[VN - AK19 • Law @Ak19_Lft]

@7a1bch @Coriandersayso Haha mấy thằng không có miền bắc chúng mày tự chơi 1 mình đi,đéo có bọn tao thì ai biết tới cái game của chúng mày mà bày đặt thượng đẳng

[VN - AK19 • Law @Ak19_Lft]

@HBaeksuk Cái sự thật đâu dễ lấp liếm thế mấy thằng Hàn,chúng m không dám nhận bắn không lại và có sử dụng để lấy cớ rút lui êm đẹp sao ??

[VN - AK19 • Law @Ak19_Lft]

@Another_Level99 Lêu lêu bọn bắn không lại dỗi hhh

[VN - AK19 • Law @Ak19_Lft]

Cách duy nhất mà họ có thể làm để né tránh chúng tôi đó là :
'' CẤM VĨNH VIỄN NHÀ VUA '' 😂😂
Họ bảo vệ người coi thường cái giải đấu danh giá nhất của họ,tôi chả còn gì để nói 😆😆
Tóm tắt diễn biến tại đây 👉 : https://t.co/IL8oHRcqnD

#himass #tanvuu
#China #thailand #pubg

[VN - AK19 • Law @Ak19_Lft]

@Metal__Agumon @grok Thế chúng m k chấp nhận việc bắn ko lại bọn tao à,chính chúng m cũng đang đá stream tương tự đấy mấy thằng tiêu chuẩn kép

[VN - AK19 • Law @Ak19_Lft]

@BoPhmThi6 @LeninUGReal M đang bảo vệ điều gì,trong khi 2 việc là giống nhau,m có xem và đánh giá phân tích tại sao họ mở 4 tab 1 lúc không,và ngay lập tức xoá bỏ live khi bị phát hiện vấn đề này.
Bọn t đã lưu lại hết video cãi bằng trời hhh

[VN - AK19 • Law @Ak19_Lft]

@Another_Level99 Oh oh oh

[VN - AK19 • Law @Ak19_Lft]

To our international friends and the entire PUBG player community:
Recently, there has been significant controversy within the gaming community regarding the publisher's decision to permanently ban two of our players, Himass and TanVuu
In Vietnam, we always strive for fair competition and aim to deliver exciting, emotional experiences to viewers and international friends during tournaments. It is deeply frustrating that a lighthearted showmatch suddenly turned into a blatant purge orchestrated by the publisher.
The outcome they delivered has left us outraged for several reasons:
- The tournament was organized with vague and unclear rules and regulations.
- They issued permanent bans against our players based on suspicions and allegations of cheating (specifically "stream sniping"). Yet, the rules were ambiguous, and the Korean participants employed similar tactics (Image 1). Many aspects of the tournament seemed biased toward the Korean side, giving them an advantage; they knew where teams were engaging in combat and avoided those areas (Image 2), and they even knew exactly which player number they were facing during confrontations.
- They demanded that our players apologize to the very person who instigated this drama, only to use that apology as evidence to pin the blame on us and justify their own actions as correct.
- It is absurd that there was no mention of their own player's violations; instead, they publicly apologized to their player—even though she sparked the drama—while treating the Vietnamese team as the default offender (as if they were the publisher's "golden child") (Image 3).
- Their player/streamer played the victim, repeatedly posting videos criticizing our players.
- Even more ridiculous is the publisher's complete lack of impartial action; they even went so far as to completely remove our language option from the game. They issued no official statement (perhaps they wanted to use this situation as a pretext to abandon a market that was generating high engagement for us).
We in Vietnam always play fair in competitive tournaments—a fact clearly recognized by the international community.
Numerous entertainment venues are boycotting the game by uninstalling PUBG from their servers and removing it from Vietnam due to this gross injustice; this move demonstrates that we are unafraid of confrontation and are ready to go all the way to address the unfair treatment of Himass and TanVuu
Did the team's humiliating defeat drive them to resort to underhanded tactics to interfere with tournaments intended to bring glory to the nation?
Once again, we ask for your thoughts, comments, and help in sharing this story with the international community so that everyone can understand the situation and avoid any misconceptions regarding Himass and TanVuu.
Everyone is witnessing these events—after all, is the best way to win simply to eliminate the King? 😂😂
We propose removing PUBG from the EWC and ENC tournaments due to a lack of competitive fairness; specifically, players are deliberately treated unfairly while the organizers show favoritism toward players affiliated with the game's own management entity.
@EWC_EN
@EWC_AR
#PUBG
#vietnam

[VN - AK19 • Law @Ak19_Lft]

@BeHappy9x Oh oh

[VN - AK19 • Law @Ak19_Lft]

@Minsocute33 Oh oh

[VN - AK19 • Law @Ak19_Lft]

To our international friends and the entire PUBG player community:
Recently, there has been significant controversy within the gaming community regarding the publisher's decision to permanently ban two of our players, Himass and TanVuu
In Vietnam, we always strive for fair competition and aim to deliver exciting, emotional experiences to viewers and international friends during tournaments. It is deeply frustrating that a lighthearted showmatch suddenly turned into a blatant purge orchestrated by the publisher.
The outcome they delivered has left us outraged for several reasons:
- The tournament was organized with vague and unclear rules and regulations.
- They issued permanent bans against our players based on suspicions and allegations of cheating (specifically "stream sniping"). Yet, the rules were ambiguous, and the Korean participants employed similar tactics (Image 1). Many aspects of the tournament seemed biased toward the Korean side, giving them an advantage; they knew where teams were engaging in combat and avoided those areas (Image 2), and they even knew exactly which player number they were facing during confrontations.
- They demanded that our players apologize to the very person who instigated this drama, only to use that apology as evidence to pin the blame on us and justify their own actions as correct.
- It is absurd that there was no mention of their own player's violations; instead, they publicly apologized to their player—even though she sparked the drama—while treating the Vietnamese team as the default offender (as if they were the publisher's "golden child") (Image 3).
- Their player/streamer played the victim, repeatedly posting videos criticizing our players.
- Even more ridiculous is the publisher's complete lack of impartial action; they even went so far as to completely remove our language option from the game. They issued no official statement (perhaps they wanted to use this situation as a pretext to abandon a market that was generating high engagement for us).
We in Vietnam always play fair in competitive tournaments—a fact clearly recognized by the international community.
Numerous entertainment venues are boycotting the game by uninstalling PUBG from their servers and removing it from Vietnam due to this gross injustice; this move demonstrates that we are unafraid of confrontation and are ready to go all the way to address the unfair treatment of Himass and TanVuu
Did the team's humiliating defeat drive them to resort to underhanded tactics to interfere with tournaments intended to bring glory to the nation?
Once again, we ask for your thoughts, comments, and help in sharing this story with the international community so that everyone can understand the situation and avoid any misconceptions regarding Himass and TanVuu.
Everyone is witnessing these events—after all, is the best way to win simply to eliminate the King? 😂😂
We propose removing PUBG from the EWC and ENC tournaments due to a lack of competitive fairness; specifically, players are deliberately treated unfairly while the organizers show favoritism toward players affiliated with the game's own management entity.
@EWC_EN
@EWC_AR
#PUBG
#vietnam

[VN - AK19 • Law @Ak19_Lft]

To our international friends and the entire PUBG player community:
Recently, there has been significant controversy within the gaming community regarding the publisher's decision to permanently ban two of our players, Himass and TanVuu
In Vietnam, we always strive for fair competition and aim to deliver exciting, emotional experiences to viewers and international friends during tournaments. It is deeply frustrating that a lighthearted showmatch suddenly turned into a blatant purge orchestrated by the publisher.
The outcome they delivered has left us outraged for several reasons:
- The tournament was organized with vague and unclear rules and regulations.
- They issued permanent bans against our players based on suspicions and allegations of cheating (specifically "stream sniping"). Yet, the rules were ambiguous, and the Korean participants employed similar tactics (Image 1). Many aspects of the tournament seemed biased toward the Korean side, giving them an advantage; they knew where teams were engaging in combat and avoided those areas (Image 2), and they even knew exactly which player number they were facing during confrontations.
- They demanded that our players apologize to the very person who instigated this drama, only to use that apology as evidence to pin the blame on us and justify their own actions as correct.
- It is absurd that there was no mention of their own player's violations; instead, they publicly apologized to their player—even though she sparked the drama—while treating the Vietnamese team as the default offender (as if they were the publisher's "golden child") (Image 3).
- Their player/streamer played the victim, repeatedly posting videos criticizing our players.
- Even more ridiculous is the publisher's complete lack of impartial action; they even went so far as to completely remove our language option from the game. They issued no official statement (perhaps they wanted to use this situation as a pretext to abandon a market that was generating high engagement for us).
We in Vietnam always play fair in competitive tournaments—a fact clearly recognized by the international community.
Numerous entertainment venues are boycotting the game by uninstalling PUBG from their servers and removing it from Vietnam due to this gross injustice; this move demonstrates that we are unafraid of confrontation and are ready to go all the way to address the unfair treatment of Himass and TanVuu
Did the team's humiliating defeat drive them to resort to underhanded tactics to interfere with tournaments intended to bring glory to the nation?
Once again, we ask for your thoughts, comments, and help in sharing this story with the international community so that everyone can understand the situation and avoid any misconceptions regarding Himass and TanVuu.
Everyone is witnessing these events—after all, is the best way to win simply to eliminate the King? 😂😂
We propose removing PUBG from the EWC and ENC tournaments due to a lack of competitive fairness; specifically, players are deliberately treated unfairly while the organizers show favoritism toward players affiliated with the game's own management entity.
@EWC_EN
@EWC_AR
#PUBG
#vietnam

[VN - AK19 • Law @Ak19_Lft]

Cách duy nhất mà họ có thể làm để né tránh chúng tôi đó là :
'' CẤM VĨNH VIỄN NHÀ VUA '' 😂😂
Họ bảo vệ người coi thường cái giải đấu danh giá nhất của họ,tôi chả còn gì để nói 😆😆
Tóm tắt diễn biến tại đây 👉 : https://t.co/bC7uXbPQJO

#himass #tanvuu
#China #thailand #pubg

[VN - AK19 • Law @Ak19_Lft]

@GVD2666 Nó nghĩ rằng sẽ đơn giản với ae việt nam quá

[VN - AK19 • Law @Ak19_Lft]

To our international friends and the entire PUBG player community:
Recently, there has been significant controversy within the gaming community regarding the publisher's decision to permanently ban two of our players, Himass and TanVuu
In Vietnam, we always strive for fair competition and aim to deliver exciting, emotional experiences to viewers and international friends during tournaments. It is deeply frustrating that a lighthearted showmatch suddenly turned into a blatant purge orchestrated by the publisher.
The outcome they delivered has left us outraged for several reasons:
- The tournament was organized with vague and unclear rules and regulations.
- They issued permanent bans against our players based on suspicions and allegations of cheating (specifically "stream sniping"). Yet, the rules were ambiguous, and the Korean participants employed similar tactics (Image 1). Many aspects of the tournament seemed biased toward the Korean side, giving them an advantage; they knew where teams were engaging in combat and avoided those areas (Image 2), and they even knew exactly which player number they were facing during confrontations.
- They demanded that our players apologize to the very person who instigated this drama, only to use that apology as evidence to pin the blame on us and justify their own actions as correct.
- It is absurd that there was no mention of their own player's violations; instead, they publicly apologized to their player—even though she sparked the drama—while treating the Vietnamese team as the default offender (as if they were the publisher's "golden child") (Image 3).
- Their player/streamer played the victim, repeatedly posting videos criticizing our players.
- Even more ridiculous is the publisher's complete lack of impartial action; they even went so far as to completely remove our language option from the game. They issued no official statement (perhaps they wanted to use this situation as a pretext to abandon a market that was generating high engagement for us).
We in Vietnam always play fair in competitive tournaments—a fact clearly recognized by the international community.
Numerous entertainment venues are boycotting the game by uninstalling PUBG from their servers and removing it from Vietnam due to this gross injustice; this move demonstrates that we are unafraid of confrontation and are ready to go all the way to address the unfair treatment of Himass and TanVuu
Did the team's humiliating defeat drive them to resort to underhanded tactics to interfere with tournaments intended to bring glory to the nation?
Once again, we ask for your thoughts, comments, and help in sharing this story with the international community so that everyone can understand the situation and avoid any misconceptions regarding Himass and TanVuu.
Everyone is witnessing these events—after all, is the best way to win simply to eliminate the King? 😂😂
We propose removing PUBG from the EWC and ENC tournaments due to a lack of competitive fairness; specifically, players are deliberately treated unfairly while the organizers show favoritism toward players affiliated with the game's own management entity.
@EWC_EN
@EWC_AR

[VN - AK19 • Law @Ak19_Lft]

@SmallKorean6767 Oh ohh

[VN - AK19 • Law @Ak19_Lft]

To our international friends and the entire PUBG player community:
Recently, there has been significant controversy within the gaming community regarding the publisher's decision to permanently ban two of our players, Himass and TanVuu
In Vietnam, we always strive for fair competition and aim to deliver exciting, emotional experiences to viewers and international friends during tournaments. It is deeply frustrating that a lighthearted showmatch suddenly turned into a blatant purge orchestrated by the publisher.
The outcome they delivered has left us outraged for several reasons:
- The tournament was organized with vague and unclear rules and regulations.
- They issued permanent bans against our players based on suspicions and allegations of cheating (specifically "stream sniping"). Yet, the rules were ambiguous, and the Korean participants employed similar tactics (Image 1). Many aspects of the tournament seemed biased toward the Korean side, giving them an advantage; they knew where teams were engaging in combat and avoided those areas (Image 2), and they even knew exactly which player number they were facing during confrontations.
- They demanded that our players apologize to the very person who instigated this drama, only to use that apology as evidence to pin the blame on us and justify their own actions as correct.
- It is absurd that there was no mention of their own player's violations; instead, they publicly apologized to their player—even though she sparked the drama—while treating the Vietnamese team as the default offender (as if they were the publisher's "golden child") (Image 3).
- Their player/streamer played the victim, repeatedly posting videos criticizing our players.
- Even more ridiculous is the publisher's complete lack of impartial action; they even went so far as to completely remove our language option from the game. They issued no official statement (perhaps they wanted to use this situation as a pretext to abandon a market that was generating high engagement for us).
We in Vietnam always play fair in competitive tournaments—a fact clearly recognized by the international community.
Numerous entertainment venues are boycotting the game by uninstalling PUBG from their servers and removing it from Vietnam due to this gross injustice; this move demonstrates that we are unafraid of confrontation and are ready to go all the way to address the unfair treatment of Himass and TanVuu
Did the team's humiliating defeat drive them to resort to underhanded tactics to interfere with tournaments intended to bring glory to the nation?
Once again, we ask for your thoughts, comments, and help in sharing this story with the international community so that everyone can understand the situation and avoid any misconceptions regarding Himass and TanVuu.
Everyone is witnessing these events—after all, is the best way to win simply to eliminate the King? 😂😂
We propose removing PUBG from the EWC and ENC tournaments due to a lack of competitive fairness; specifically, players are deliberately treated unfairly while the organizers show favoritism toward players affiliated with the game's own management entity.
@EWC_EN
@EWC_AR
#PUBG
#vietnam

[VN - AK19 • Law @Ak19_Lft]

To our international friends and the entire PUBG player community:
Recently, there has been significant controversy within the gaming community regarding the publisher's decision to permanently ban two of our players, Himass and TuanVu.
In Vietnam, we always strive for fair competition and aim to deliver exciting, emotional experiences to viewers and international friends during tournaments. It is deeply frustrating that a lighthearted showmatch suddenly turned into a blatant purge orchestrated by the publisher.
The outcome they delivered has left us outraged for several reasons:
- The tournament was organized with vague and unclear rules and regulations.
- They issued permanent bans against our players based on suspicions and allegations of cheating (specifically "stream sniping"). Yet, the rules were ambiguous, and the Korean participants employed similar tactics (Image 1). Many aspects of the tournament seemed biased toward the Korean side, giving them an advantage; they knew where teams were engaging in combat and avoided those areas (Image 2), and they even knew exactly which player number they were facing during confrontations.
- They demanded that our players apologize to the very person who instigated this drama, only to use that apology as evidence to pin the blame on us and justify their own actions as correct.
- It is absurd that there was no mention of their own player's violations; instead, they publicly apologized to their player—even though she sparked the drama—while treating the Vietnamese team as the default offender (as if they were the publisher's "golden child") (Image 3).
- Their player/streamer played the victim, repeatedly posting videos criticizing our players.
- Even more ridiculous is the publisher's complete lack of impartial action; they even went so far as to completely remove our language option from the game. They issued no official statement (perhaps they wanted to use this situation as a pretext to abandon a market that was generating high engagement for us).
We in Vietnam always play fair in competitive tournaments—a fact clearly recognized by the international community.
Numerous entertainment venues are boycotting the game by uninstalling PUBG from their servers and removing it from Vietnam due to this gross injustice; this move demonstrates that we are unafraid of confrontation and are ready to go all the way to address the unfair treatment of Himass and TuanVu.
Did the team's humiliating defeat drive them to resort to underhanded tactics to interfere with tournaments intended to bring glory to the nation?
Once again, we ask for your thoughts, comments, and help in sharing this story with the international community so that everyone can understand the situation and avoid any misconceptions regarding Himass and TuanVu.
Everyone is witnessing these events—after all, is the best way to win simply to eliminate the King? 😂😂
We propose removing PUBG from the EWC and ENC tournaments due to a lack of competitive fairness; specifically, players are deliberately treated unfairly while the organizers show favoritism toward players affiliated with the game's own management entity.

[VN - AK19 • Law @Ak19_Lft]

To our international friends and the entire PUBG player community:
Recently, there has been significant controversy within the gaming community regarding the publisher's decision to permanently ban two of our players, Himass and TuanVu.
In Vietnam, we always strive for fair competition and aim to deliver exciting, emotional experiences to viewers and international friends during tournaments. It is deeply frustrating that a lighthearted showmatch suddenly turned into a blatant purge orchestrated by the publisher.
The outcome they delivered has left us outraged for several reasons:
- The tournament was organized with vague and unclear rules and regulations.
- They issued permanent bans against our players based on suspicions and allegations of cheating (specifically "stream sniping"). Yet, the rules were ambiguous, and the Korean participants employed similar tactics (Image 1). Many aspects of the tournament seemed biased toward the Korean side, giving them an advantage; they knew where teams were engaging in combat and avoided those areas (Image 2), and they even knew exactly which player number they were facing during confrontations.
- They demanded that our players apologize to the very person who instigated this drama, only to use that apology as evidence to pin the blame on us and justify their own actions as correct.
- It is absurd that there was no mention of their own player's violations; instead, they publicly apologized to their player—even though she sparked the drama—while treating the Vietnamese team as the default offender (as if they were the publisher's "golden child") (Image 3).
- Their player/streamer played the victim, repeatedly posting videos criticizing our players.
- Even more ridiculous is the publisher's complete lack of impartial action; they even went so far as to completely remove our language option from the game. They issued no official statement (perhaps they wanted to use this situation as a pretext to abandon a market that was generating high engagement for us).
We in Vietnam always play fair in competitive tournaments—a fact clearly recognized by the international community.
Numerous entertainment venues are boycotting the game by uninstalling PUBG from their servers and removing it from Vietnam due to this gross injustice; this move demonstrates that we are unafraid of confrontation and are ready to go all the way to address the unfair treatment of Himass and TuanVu.
Did the team's humiliating defeat drive them to resort to underhanded tactics to interfere with tournaments intended to bring glory to the nation?
Once again, we ask for your thoughts, comments, and help in sharing this story with the international community so that everyone can understand the situation and avoid any misconceptions regarding Himass and TuanVu.
Everyone is witnessing these events—after all, is the best way to win simply to eliminate the King? 😂😂
We propose removing PUBG from the EWC and ENC tournaments due to a lack of competitive fairness; specifically, players are deliberately treated unfairly while the organizers show favoritism toward players affiliated with the game's own management entity.