Dave Stewart

Alaskan Gold Miner, Crypto prospector
AU AG
#bitcoin $Link OK;LG

[Maria Elisa @mariaelisasmith]

El resentimiento socialista es una forma de brujería. La mala energía y los pensamientos negativos en general son brujería también. No hace falta practicar rituales satánicos para hacer brujería y condenar a los espacios donde ocurren esos pensamientos al mal. La envidia, el rencor, el odio, incluso el victimismo y la depresión: todo es brujería que atrae tragedias y miseria. Es crucial cuidar la mente y utilizar su poder cuántico creativo solo para el bien.

[Dave Stewart @AkGhostwalker]

@WoodButcherWork @SanfiElderberry @clif_high Buy it in glass bottles though, not plastic

[Dave Stewart @AkGhostwalker]

@ksorbs 🙏🙏🙏💖

[Alice Smith @TheAliceSmith]

The diversity of those who believe men are women:

The low IQ who don’t understand reality
The mentally ill who are divorced from reality
The sexually perverted who resent reality
The postmodernists who reject the concept of reality
Politicians after votes

[Alice Smith @TheAliceSmith]

All this “I’m offended” stuff is for children. It’s a shameful admission for an adult.

Your emotions are your responsibility, not mine.

Emotional control and resilience are for adults.

Demanding never to get hurt is the sign of an infantile mindset.

[Dave Stewart @AkGhostwalker]

@CryptoxxxCoffee "In 24 hours"

[Edmond Bugos @ebugos]

It's amazing how much the ruling classes persuade themselves that the people need their guidance.

[Dave Stewart @AkGhostwalker]

@ksorbs 🙏🙏🙏💖

[Rock Chartrand @RockChartrand]

It’s amazing how many people think they’re owed something simply for existing, as if another person’s productivity creates a moral claim on their life. They see someone who built more, created more, or earned more, and instead of asking how did they do it, they ask how do I get a piece of it without doing the work.

And here’s the irony:
Almost everything people praise the government for giving them is actually subsidized by the very people they resent. The rich aren’t hurting the poor. They’re the ones creating the jobs, investment, infrastructure, and the rising quality of goods that get cheaper and better over time. Without that wealth creation, there’s nothing to tax, nothing to distribute, nothing to run programs with.

But socialists and communists never cared about helping the poor. If they did, they'd advocate for what actually lifts people out of poverty: productivity, innovation, trade, ownership, and freedom.

Their goal isn’t to raise the bottom.
It’s to pull down the top.

Not to empower the poor, but to punish the successful.
Envy dressed up as morality.
Resentment masquerading as justice.

When your moral standard is “no one is allowed to have more than me,” the end point isn’t equality, it’s universal poverty.

A race to the bottom, sold as compassion.

[Rock Chartrand @RockChartrand]

Capitalism isn’t about “limitless consumption.” It’s about turning the same amount of material into more value. Innovation is literally doing more with less. That’s why under capitalism:

• One acre feeds hundreds now instead of one family
• A phone replaces 20 separate devices
• Energy per unit of output keeps dropping
• Waste gets minimized because efficiency is profitable

Capitalism is the only system that rewards reducing costs, reducing waste, improving productivity, and increasing output from the same finite inputs.

Now look at communism.

Communism doesn’t innovate. It consumes. It treats resources as free, labor as disposable, and efficiency as irrelevant because prices and profit signals don’t exist. That’s why communist economies:

• Strip mines land
• Collapse agriculture
• Trigger famine
• Waste labor
• Destroy forests
• Pollute waterways
• Burn through resources with no replacement

Because there’s no incentive to preserve or improve anything.

So if you want to use biology analogies:

Capitalism behaves like healthy tissue, adaptive, regenerative, efficient, constantly improving.

Communism behaves like cancer. It consumes its host until there's nothing left, then dies with it.

Capitalism expands value.
Communism consumes it.

That’s the difference.

[Hotep Jesus @HotepJesus]

When you raise the minimum wage you put small business owners on the food bank line.

Now you have more poor people dependent on the government.

Socialism kills.

[Edmond Bugos @ebugos]

Im not a fan of these new fangled terms, like a 'trust society', because it invites too many non libertarian solutions to the table. It is better to stay focused on private property rights. In a society where those are cherished, trust will be possible.

[Maria Elisa @mariaelisasmith]

Entiendo que los venezolanos estemos traumados políticamente, pero hacer política con odio te nubla la vista y te impide observar y diagnosticar la realidad honestamente, hasta el punto de faltarle el respeto y acusar a Tucker Carlson —una de las voces más claras, brillantes e importantes de la derecha americana, y totalmente America First— de ser propagandista de un gobierno extranjero.

Nada de lo que dice Tucker es mentira: el régimen es más conservador socialmente que la oposición, que sí es progresista, globalista, pro-LGBT, etc., y lo de “narcoterrorismo” es propaganda de guerra para manufacturar consenso para una intervención. Venezuela tiene un rol insignificante en el narcotráfico que entra a EEUU y si lo de narcoterrorismo fuese una razón legítima para intervenir, a donde tienen que entrar ya es a México y a Colombia, no a Venezuela.

Estas son verdades difíciles que los venezolanos tenemos que procesar para poder hacer diagnósticos correctos y crear narrativas honestas para un cambio de régimen. Hay mil razones reales para querer un cambio — no hace falta mentir, inventar o insultar a quienes le estás pidiendo ayuda por tener una perspectiva distinta a la tuya. A la oposición y a Venezuela en general le falta mucho por madurar y quizás por eso el régimen sigue en el poder y la oposición no pega ni una.

[Edmond Bugos @ebugos]

If there was just one principle that needs to be defended to bring sanity to this world it is the absolute and natural right to private property. https://t.co/NvzKK9h3wE

[Maria Elisa @mariaelisasmith]

Dios no es tribal, no elige pueblos, no crea religiones y no necesita adoración.

Dios es la fuente espiritual de todo el universo, amor puro y creación.

[Maria Elisa @mariaelisasmith]

El único requerimiento para participar en las religiones abrahámicas es creer en alguna de ellas y hacer los rituales correspondientes. Un buen cristiano debe ser buena persona, creer en el mesías Jesucristo, amar al prójimo, ir a misa, etc.

Bello, pero eso no es suficiente para ser una buena persona en este universo.

Dios decidió que este era un universo creativo y que el propósito de todo es la creación y la creación es siempre ya, tú aquí, en este momento, creando nuevos momentos y proyectos de vida y dentro de cada nuevo momento una dosis nueva de creatividad.

No es suficiente ser bueno y amar y creer mucho en x o y mitología. Hay que ser creativos y maximizar nuestro potencial en cada momento. Hay que maximizar el valor que creamos y le aportamos al universo en esta danza eterna de co-creación. Eso es lo que más desea de nosotros el verdadero Dios.

[Dave Stewart @AkGhostwalker]

@CryptoNobler Done

[0xNobler @CryptoNobler]

Giving away 10 $BNB (~$10,000) 🔥

To celebrate the new ATH, I’m giving away $10K in #BNB to one lucky follower!

Like, RT, and comment 'done' to enter.

A random winner will be picked via Grok in ~19 hours. Must be following and have DMs open.

[Dave Stewart @AkGhostwalker]

@RobertMSterling @Annoyed_Otter Well stated

[Robert Sterling @RobertMSterling]

(Warning: long rant)

My liberal friends are completely oblivious about how radicalizing the last week has been for tens of millions of normal Americans. Zero clue.

I’m not talking about people who are “online”; I mean regular, everyday Americans. “Normies.” People who scroll through Facebook posts and Instagram reels from the Dutch Bros drive thru line. Political moderates who have water cooler chats about Mahomes touchdowns and Bon Jovi concerts, not Twitter threads or Rachel Maddow monologues.

Millions of them. Tens of millions. They’re logging on, they’re engaging, and they’re furious.

And I’ll be candid: They blame you guys. They blame the left.

Regardless of whether you believe it to be justified, they think you’re the bad guys here. And they are reacting accordingly.

I can already hear some of you racing toward the comments to start screeching in moral indignation, so I’m going to be blunt: Shut up and listen to what I’m telling you. Your movement will lose any semblance of relevance if you don’t develop some small measure of self-awareness, and—absent someone force-feeding you bitter medicine—you guys collectively lack the humility to do this on your own.

Here are the facts:

Fact 1. Tens of millions of Americans started the week seeing a 23-year-old blonde woman—a young woman in whom virtually every parent watching pictured their own daughter—stabbed in the neck by a career criminal. These people then found out the murderer had been released from jail 14 times over.

Fact 2. Two days later, tens of millions of Americans watched a video of Charlie Kirk get murdered speaking to college students. Millions of these people knew who Charlie was; millions of them didn’t. Upon seeing the video, however, these normal Americans from across the land and across the political spectrum agreed that he was the victim of a terrible, fundamentally unjustifiable crime, and their hearts broke in sympathy for his family. Good people who had never even heard the name Charlie Kirk before wept.

Fact 3. Immediately after seeing the footage of a peaceful young man get shot in the neck, these same people logged onto Facebook and Instagram (remember, we are talking about regular Americans, not perpetually online Twitter or Bluesky users) and saw some of their local nurses, school teachers, college administrators, and retail workers celebrating this horrific crime. Not just defending it, but cheering it.

These are all facts. You may not like the implications of these facts, and we can certainly debate the underlying causes thereof, but, indisputably, they are nevertheless factual statements.

Here’s what it means for you, the Democrats reading this:

These normal, middle-of-the-road, non-political citizens just become politically active. They realized that politics cares about them, even if they don’t particularly care about politics. After watching Iryna Zarutska and Charlie Kirk both bleed out from the neck, they think their lives and the physical safety of their families—the bedrock of human society, the foundation of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs—depend on political activation, whether they desire it or not.

These people are now sprinting—not jogging, not walking, but racing—to the right. Because they blame you guys for everything that just happened.

When they see footage of Decarlos Brown stabbing a Ukrainian refugee to death, they don’t see just one demon-possessed man. They picture every university administrator, HR bureaucrat, and DEI apparatchik that ever lectured them about systemic racism, the “carceral state,” or the need to release violent crime suspects without bail in the name of social justice.

They then think back to conversations they’ve had with their cop friends—their buddy from high school who quit the force after getting tired of being called a racist, their friend at the local YMCA who vents about having to release career criminals because Soros-funded prosecutors aren’t willing to file charges—and they realize everything the left has told them over the last five years has been utter bullshit.

And they blame you. Because, even if you count yourself as a moderate Democrat, your party supported the district attorneys, city council members, and mayors that let fictitious concerns about mental health and racial justice supersede very real concerns for their family’s safety.

When these Americans see blood erupt from the side of Charlie Kirk’s neck, they don’t see just a martyred political activist. They think of every extreme leftist they’ve ever met who (1) calls anyone to the right of Hillary Clinton a fascist and (2) constantly jokes—“jokes”—about punching Nazis and “bashing the fash.”

They realize that there really do exist people who wish to see them dead for their moderately conservative political beliefs, their Christian faith, and even the color of their skin. They ask themselves if the violence visited upon Charlie might one day show up on their own doorstep.

And they blame you. Because, even if you’re just a center-of-the-road liberal, you lacked the courage to police your own ranks. You let modern-day Maoist red guards run loose across every facet of society, and what started with social-media struggle sessions has now turned to 30-06 bullet holes.

When these Americans log onto social media and see their neighbors justifying, celebrating, glorifying murder, they realize that some who walk among them are soulless ghouls at best, literally demon-possessed at worst. These people—whether they faithfully attend church every Sunday or only attend with relatives once a year, on Christmas Eve—start talking about things like spiritual warfare. They implicitly understand that no normal human casually celebrates the mortal demise of a peaceful person.

And they blame you. Because, even if you condemned Charlie Kirk’s murder, they probably haven’t seen you condemn those in your own movement who cheered it on. They view you as complicit in allowing heartless fellow travelers to celebrate death, and it repulses them.

For all of these situations, what has your response been? Nothing but bullshit.

In response to Iryna Zarutska bleeding out on the floor of a train, you post bullshit statistics about reductions in reported crime, when everyone who’s ever been to a major urban center in the last decade knows that actual crime has skyrocketed, only for victims not to waste their time reporting it to cops that don’t have the manpower to respond and prosecutors that seek to downgrade as many felonies as possible to misdemeanor citations.

In response to a 31-year-old man taking a bullet to the neck in front of his family, you post nothing but bullshit whataboutism.

> “What about January 6th?” (Honest answer: After you let Liz Cheney spend two years operating a star chamber in the House, combined with countless other failed attempts at “lawfare” against Trump, no one cares anymore.)

> “What about Mike Lee making a dumb joke on Twitter about some guy in a mask in Minnesota?” (No one outside of Utah, DC, or Twitter knows who Mike Lee even is.)

> “What about Paul Pelosi?” (That’s not comparable to Charlie Kirk getting shot, and we all know it. And, again, Paul who?)

> “What about regulations on assault rifles?” (That’s not going to get you very far when one of these killers used a knife and the other one used a common hunting rifle.)

In response to teachers, healthcare workers, and thousands of other liberals cheering on Charlie’s murder, it’s nothing but more bullshit and misdirection.

> “It’s not THAT many people celebrating!” (Yes, it is. Everyone has seen it on their Facebook and Instagram feeds.)

> “I thought you guys didn’t support cancel culture.” (We don’t cancel people over their opinions; we’re more than happy to see people lose their jobs—especially their taxpayer-funded jobs—for actively cheering on murder, though. If you can’t see the difference, that’s your own shortcoming.)

All bullshit. Not even smart bullshit, but stale, mid-grade, low-IQ bullshit. Ordinary Americans see right through it, and they don’t like how it smells.

You probably don’t like hearing this. But you need to hear it.

Because I’m right, and, as you reflect on this, you know I’m right. The ranks of my political movement gained millions of righteously angry new members this week. We have a mandate to ensure these crimes never happen again, and that’s exactly what we are now going to do.

If you want to keep a seat at the table as we do so, you’d better clean house and start policing your own.