We will follow the discussion with an extended Q&A session. Please use this link (https://t.co/Y6fX6BQo3t) to register for this important conversation! 3/3
SER Café is a forum where you can virtually meet the authors of papers published in Socio-Economic Review. The second SER Café of 2023 will be held on Monday, May 15, at 11am EST/ 8am PST/ 5pm CET! We will hear from Greta Krippner, Timo Walter, and Leon Wansleben. 1/3
I am off Twitter. Enough is enough. Musk ruined it. Letting Russian & Chinese propaganda trolls to the platform did it for me. If you too want out be careful not to give up your handle as bots and others will take it over and you will soon be advocating for Ukrainian genocide.
(UC San Diego) about the relationship between technology, economy, and society. The authors will briefly discuss their respective SER articles, “AI Meets Narrative: The State of Research on Expectation Formation in Sociology and Economics” (2021) and “Predicting the Future:" 2/3
Viktor Orbán in his less than generous victory speech singled out two people, who according to him tried but failed to derail his electoral win. George Soros and Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
Hungary reelected Viktor Orban and voted in a new, Nazi party into Parliament. This is Orban's 5th term. At what point do we say that voters are responsible for their kleptocratic autocracy and amoral collective egotism?
1/2 I praise the approval by the #UN GA with an unprecedented majority of votes of the resolution with a strong demand to Russia to immediately stop the treacherous attack on 🇺🇦. I’m grateful to everyone & every state that voted in favor. You have chosen the right side of history
1) The fate of #Ukraine is being decided tonight, but also the fate of the west. Declare a #NoFlyZone over Ukraine at the invitation of their sovereign govt. Disrupt Russias air ops to give the heroic Ukrainians a fair fight. It’s now, or later.
I am a bit tired of those who fault the West for disregarding Russia's "legitimate security interests." I have four questions to them:
1. Do they REALLY think that NATO or anyone would attack a dictatorship with Russia's nuclear arsenal? (Think North Korea.)
2. If we accept that
there are such legitimate security interests, why stop at Russia? How about China? India? Iran? Ukraine?
3. Did Nazi Germany have legitimate security interests? In other words, do we accept the legitimacy of ANY regime just because it exists? Even if it is an evil dictatorship?