"Police ko ham sambhal lenge. Bajrang Dal ko kaun sambhalega?" (We will handle the police. How are we going to handle Bajrang Dal?)
This is what several clerics told Shahid Parvez when he went to mosques in Delhi's Okhla area with this Hindu woman to get conversion-nikahnama papers
What this reveals: Laws matter but conversion networks fear alert local communities more
For every case that reaches a police station, there are many many more that are stopped because ground warriors intervene. Naman to every one of them
@swati_gs The elitist disdain for Bajrang Dal and other such saffron organisations looks ridiculous in the light of such incidents. Bajrang Dal may be a bit rough around the edges, but better than leftist idiots of JNU.
Winston Churchill’s actions during the Bengal Famine of 1943 were not just negligent - they were deliberate acts of genocidal cruelty fueled by racism and imperial greed. Claims by apologists attempting to paint Churchill as innocent collapse under the weight of historical evidence. Here I debunk their lying claims:
Claim 1: British government found out about the famine’s severity in August 1943.
Truth: Churchill’s administration knew of the impending famine 8 months before it unfolded. On December 18, 1942, the Food Department of India sent a desperate telegram to the British Secretary of State, warning of catastrophic food shortages caused by monsoon failure (Image 1). The plea was unequivocal - India faced a shortfall of 1.4 million tons of rice, 650,000 tons of millets, 400,000 tons of wheat, and 200,000 tons of gram. The message was clear, immediate assistance was required to avoid absolute disaster.
Instead Churchill not only withheld aid while the famine raged - his administration FORCED India to export 360,000 tons of wheat and rice in 1942-43. This grain, which could have saved two million Indian lives, was diverted to support British war efforts. Churchill had 8 full months to act but deliberately did NOTHING to prevent the oncoming famine crisis in India.
Claim 2: Churchill worked hard to “save the people of Bengal.”
Truth: Churchill’s policies were rooted in contempt for Indian lives. Viceroy Wavell’s journal reveals that during a September 1943 Cabinet meeting, Churchill raged against sending food relief to India, insisting that supplies should instead be stockpiled for liberated European nations like Greece (Image 2). Wavell’s damning words capture Churchill’s callousness:
"Apparently it is more important to save the Greeks and liberated countries from starvation than the Indians."
Churchill clearly commanded that relief should be restricted ONLY to those directly contributing to British war efforts, such as British army soldiers and factory/railroad workers, while leaving millions of the most helpless ordinary civilians to starve.
Claim 3: Churchill authorized around 1 million tons of grain to be shipped to India between August 1943 and December 1944.
Truth: This is a deviously misleading calculated half-truth. While approximately 900,000 tons of grain were sent, Churchill did not intend this food for Indian starving civilians at all. Viceroy Wavell’s June 24, 1944 telegram makes it clear that this grain was needed to feed the British Army stationed in India (Image 3). He warned Churchill that bases were “liable to starvation” if food was not imported. The British military alone required over 1 million tons of grain annually for its operations, leaving NO meaningful relief for starving Indian civilians. Churchill’s shipments were not humanitarian aid at all - they were clinically heartless logistical measures granted only to sustain Britain’s war machine. By late 1943, when he finally reluctantly sanctioned some aid at the insistence of Wavell & Amery, even that relief was conditional. In a further act of cruelty, Churchill agreed to send 150,000 tons of wheat to India ONLY if India supplied an equivalent amount of rice to Ceylon. Churchill FORCED India to export more than 70,000 tons of rice to Ceylon between January and July 1943 exactly when the worst part of the famine was setting in.
Such policies reveal Churchill’s true priorities: maintaining imperial dominance, no matter the human cost of Indian lives. This demolishes the argument that it was just a problem with shipping due to the war. Apparently there was no problem with shipping when sending food grains OUT of India during the height of the Famine!
In December 1943, the United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation Administration (UNRRA) was created. Friends of India lobbied the USA for famine relief through UNRRA. But Churchill sent his representative Llewelyn to argue AGAINST any aid to India with the outrageous claim that the Indian famine had NOT been caused by war efforts. The corpulent tyrant ensured starving Indians could not even get UNRRA aid despite thousands of Indians fighting for the British in the War. And to add insult to injury he made India PAY $24 million while Indians starved!
Worst of all, Viceroy Wavell’s June 24, 1944 telegram makes it clear that there was a SECOND FAMINE impending in India in 1944 (Image 4), and grain was desperately needed to feed the British Army stationed in India. He warned Churchill that bases were “liable to starvation” if food was not imported. But Churchill did NOTHING. It was only by a huge stroke of luck that the monsoon turned out to be better than expected and Indians were able to avert a SECOND deadly famine in 1944 - otherwise we would be talking about 10s of millions murdered.
The Bengal Famine of 1943 was not an unavoidable calamity - it was a man-made atrocity, orchestrated by Churchill’s racist and imperialist policies. Under his leadership, 3–5 million Indians died, not because of natural disaster but because Churchill mercilessly prioritized British interests over Indian lives. His infamous comment to Leo Amery that “famine relief would do no good because Indians breed like rabbits” lays bare the contempt he held for millions of Indians dying in agony after Britain had sucked all of India's resources dry. To Churchill, the death of millions of Indians was not a tragedy - it was pest control of the Indians he held in such contempt.
Churchill’s actions were not only cruel but genocidal in intent. He deliberately exacerbated famine conditions by denying vital food shipments to India, exporting vital resources from India, ignoring urgent warnings, desperate pleas for help and hoarding grain for British soldiers and European allies. The evidence is irrefutable: Winston Churchill was no hero. For India, he was a murderous tyrant whose policies inflicted unspeakable suffering. The Bengal Famine remains a permanent and horrific stain on Winston Churchill's legacy, a chilling reminder of the horrors of imperialism, and an indictment of those who seek to glorify it.
Had it had been a Western country with millions of white Christians that starved instead of brown Hindus, then none of these apologists would make a peep to defend Churchill’s murderous actions.
If writing petitions, appeals, or clemency requests to the British was enough to discredit a freedom fighter, then why is the scrutiny reserved almost exclusively for Veer Savarkar?
Bal Gangadhar Tilak, Ram Prasad Bismil, Subramania Bharati, Barindra Kumar Ghosh, Sachindra Nath Sanyal, and several other freedom fighters also submitted petitions or appeals to the colonial administration at various points.
Yet decades later, only Savarkar is relentlessly targeted, while similar actions by other freedom fighters are quietly ignored. Why? Because the issue was never the petitions. The issue is Veer Savarkar himself.
Meet Jai Prakash Jatav from Raakh series (based on Ranga Billa case):
> Works as police inspector
> Faces caste discrimination
> Has photos of Ambedkar & Phule in house
But in reality, the inspector’s name was V.P. Gupta.
This is how fake narratives are created & spread.
I came across this Indian-Canadian couple, Ekansh and Danielle.
I gotta say, he is very lucky. She wears a mangalsutra without the patriarchy police crying.
She gave birth to their kid, no "my body, my choice" drama.
Buys him a PS5 with her own money, and her parents love him a lot.
Good women exist out there, brothers. Hope is alive.
EXCLUSIVE:
During Annual Day programme of Kids World English School in Partur, Jalna — school children danced on the Pakistani song of "Gustakh Nabi Ki Ek Saza..." with dummy swords.
In the background, they had celebrated with photo of Pakistani terrorist Mumtaz Qadri, who had assassinated Pakistan's Punjab Governor — as he had spoken in defence of a Christian woman Asia Bibi, accused of blasphemy.
This school claims to be affiliated with CBSE board ( @cbseindia29), and allegedly is promoting extremist ideology amongst children.
We urge @NCPCR_ to immediately take cognizance of the matter, and direct security agencies to investigate it and take appropriate action.
cc: @DGPMaharashtra, @sp_jalna
@SupriyaShrinate Madam, mujhe to isme kahin wo sab nahi dikh raha jo aap Bata rahe hain, Modi ji Anya Kai netao se mile, jaise Meloni, von Der Leyen, aur phir photo ke liye khade ho Gaye, ab aapki tarah sab log apne peeche khade logo ko haath to nahi lagate, jaise aapne pede ko lagaya thha
@ameershahul@Chellaney MMS govt. did nothing and that incident was a result of MMS kowtowing in front of the Americans as if he is leading a subject country.
Gargajj is most lunatic & fanatic of Jathedars.
Here’s him humiliating Head of Punjab’s top univ for-correctly-speaking on shared wisdom bw Rgveda & teachings of Guru Nanak.
Those supporting fatwas on CM Mann today for shortsighted politics will themselves be victims soon enough.
@bagga_buntyy1 Sourav Ganguly and Michael Vaughan need to be in that list, Kohli doesn't belong there, just screaming, scowling, abusing doesn't make someone a good captain
The Cost of a "Liberal" Faith: How Shamli's Ayush Malik Was Lost
Ayush Malik's conversion reveals a harsh truth.
While Islam aggressively enforces strict and uncompromising boundaries, Hindus have diluted their own faith with weak and self-defeating taglines: "Hinduism is just a way of life," "Rituals don't matter," "No need for temples."
Ayush was brainwashed into believing that since Hinduism has no system or mandates, leaving it means nothing. A faith that demands nothing can defend nothing. @UnSubtleDesi explains.
@utkarsh_dhoni@psychidiaries Its amazing how Dhoni fans want to give credit for everything to Dhoni, Ishant had some success in 2014, first in NZ then First 2 Tests in Eng. But they were temporary and Ishant was back to being unreliable
हाइपरक्वेस्ट का छद्म-विज्ञान, छद्म-गणित एवं छद्म-इतिहास: भाग १
Pseudo-science, pseudo-math, and pseudo-history of HyperQuest: Part 1 (in Hindi)
This video is a response to the original 13-minute 40-second-long video posted by HyperQuest on 6 June 2026.
Many thanks to @Schandillia for his brilliant research and critique of the claims by @vishalonquest.
Watch and share. Do comment if I have made any mistakes.
Let us celebrate the genuine achievements of India in Mathematics and Science, rather than making ourselves the laughing stock of the world by mislabelling all modern science and mathematics as ‘Vedic’.
0:00 Introduction
1:01 Misrepresentation by HyperQuest
2:49 IBM is not spending on Vedic Mathematics
6:32 Vedic Mathematics did not improve IBM computers
8:33 Cross multiplication is older than Vedic Mathematics
14:19 Processing also generates heat
15:20 Landauer's principle
16:48 Chips shut down before melting
17:50 Chips are becoming more efficient even today
18:07 Heat death is a term in Thermodynamics
19:08 Conclusion
This is one of the worst, most disgusting trash movies ever made in Bollywood.
It shows the story of a hoe woman who raised two hoe daughters.
After watching the movie, you'll realise how trash all of them are.
But the movie tries to show them as victims and men as villains.
An unemployed, greedy daughter who married a man for his money doesn't want to cook for his family.
She also flirts with her childhood friend for her benefits.
She's shown as a victim.
The second daughter's marriage doesn't last. She makes vulgar reels with random men.
And the mother herself is the biggest hoe. She gets pregnant by a random man after her husband's death.
She uses herself and her daughters to trap the neighbour who owned their house.
That neighbour is shown as a villain and they are shown as victims, even though it was his house and he had every right to evict these women.
Feminist girls consider this an empowering movie.
Why does Bollywood want to make women such degenerates?