Alder Hood

#Trump2024. Proud father and vice president of The DWSA.

[Alder Hood @AlderHood]

I love how POTUS does his job and the left scream and rant to their Quizling media and states. Rounding the Liberal base herd and educating the Conservative public. Only in a Free Republic!

[Spitfire @RealSpitfire]

🔥🔥🔥🔥

New ad drop!!! This is gonna leave a mark😅😅

[Juanita Broaddrick @atensnut]

DHS has confirmed that Venzuela has emptied their prisons and mental institutions and sent them to the US.

[Kyle Becker @kylenabecker]

BREAKING: CNN just found out that Kamala Harris is a LIAR. This is simply hilarious 🤣

[Kyle Becker @kylenabecker]

JUST IN: @CNN insists that only State-approved Propaganda Media will be allowed to stream the presidential debate between Biden and Trump, share commentary on it or fact-check it in real-time.

This is literally an "attack on democracy"!

Let's see how @X responds

[Alder Hood @AlderHood]

@Blockchain6908 @ProTheDoge What do you think he's named after? Do you really think he'd have held dogecoin for so long if he was against it? He had 3 million usd in dogecoin 2 years ago & didn't sell. You can like multiple blockchains.

[Alder Hood @AlderHood]

@Blockchain6908 @ProTheDoge @RocketEGC He blacked out his wallet address. He blacked out the latter portion of his balance because if he didn't, people would be able to find his address.

[Chuck Callesto @ChuckCallesto]

BREAKING REPORT: ⚠️ Truckers supporting Donald Trump TO REFUSE all loads going to New York City regardless of the offer..

DEVELOPING..

[Patrick Webb @Patrickwebb]

@JoeBiden The Biden White House doesn’t know the difference between jobs created vs jobs recovered.

[Kyle Becker @kylenabecker]

President Donald Trump Had Executive Immunity on January 6

First, Trump was prosecuted during impeachment, de facto proof that this is the Constitutional procedure for addressing claims of presidential wrongdoing.

Donald Trump was acquitted by a Senate vote.

Second, Donald Trump's actions on January 6 were constitutionally protected, and therefore, legal.

Trump's campaign had brought forth dozens of lawsuits.

He made a speech protected by the First Amendment.

He did not direct unarmed people to somehow 'overthrow' the government, which is actually impossible.

He said to 'peacefully and patriotically' make your your voices heard in order to encourage election challenges.

The J6 riots actually disrupted this legal mechanism for disputing elections.

Donald Trump realized this and issued multiple statements in the early afternoon to respect law and order and for protesters to go home.

There is thus no linkage between Donald Trump and the J6 riots, which occurred despite his wishes, stated on the record, that 10,000 National Guard troops be present to protect the Congress.

Third, right after the election's certification on January 7th, Donald Trump stated in a video address that he would step down on January 20.

There is no case to be made that Donald Trump either broke the law by challenging the 2020 election or that he had anything to do with an "insurrection."

J6 extremists carried out a pre-planned attack on the capitol with the advance knowledge of the FBI and actually disrupted the election challenges.

Therefore, Donald Trump could not have 'incited' them to attack the Capitol.

This D.C. court of appeals ruling stripping Donald Trump of executive immunity is the death of America as we know it if it is allowed to stand.

This J6 sham case should be immediately dismissed.

[Alder Hood @AlderHood]

@SnailStudy @oidaheastmi @Cloudboy_h @AnselLindner @Culture_Crit Re-read the law. Section 130. According to this law, if you say "I hate Christians" or "I hate Jews" or "I hate black people" you can be prosecuted

This is not free speech. As I said before, anything that does not incite violence is free speech.

[Alder Hood @AlderHood]

@oidaheastmi @Cloudboy_h @AnselLindner @Culture_Crit *that does not incite violence) This

[Alder Hood @AlderHood]

@oidaheastmi @Cloudboy_h @AnselLindner @Culture_Crit I never said any specifics, all I said is that if you speak in a way that the government dislikes, you'll be arrested (that does not incite This is true in both countries, different reasons, same situation.

Neither have freedom of press or freedom of speech.

[Alder Hood @AlderHood]

@oidaheastmi @Cloudboy_h @AnselLindner @Culture_Crit Factually, there is not free speech in Germany according to German law

"insulting, maliciously maligning or defaming one of the aforementioned groups"

[Alder Hood @AlderHood]

@oidaheastmi @Cloudboy_h @AnselLindner @Culture_Crit "or" (keyword)

I think it's a part of free speech to say unfavorable things as long as it does not incite violence, free speech only matters when someone is saying something you disagree with. Again, if Germany doesn't mind, I don't care. But it's just not free speech.

[Alder Hood @AlderHood]

@oidaheastmi @Cloudboy_h @AnselLindner @Culture_Crit "Hate Speech" does not exist, there is no objective principal as to what hate speech is. The term hate speech is used historically to control speech, actively working against any ideals of actual free speech.

[Alder Hood @AlderHood]

@oidaheastmi @Cloudboy_h @AnselLindner @Culture_Crit https://t.co/MedguuCWOX

Please, read the law yourself. It allows for the arrest of those who did not incite violence, note the wording in section 130 incitement of masses: "or"