Adam Lavine

[Dior Beauty Japan @DiorBeautyJP]

【本日5/29(金) 20時よりライブ配信】
「ディオール バックステージ」から、水光ハイライト スティックや限定色コレクション、5プルーフの多機能メイクキープ ミストが登場​。

本日20時のライブ配信では、本製品をご紹介するライブ配信も。視聴者特典もご用意しているライブをお見逃しなく。

[Adam Lavine @Ale__vine]

@yourjisooloves @Cforcherilia ntar jisoo dkatain ngikutin idol'a lagii🙃🙃

[JISOO NEWS @NEWSJISOO]

#JISOO has been selected as Salomon’s newest Global Ambassador.

[JISOO CHARTS @jisooschart]

JISOO has been selected as the Global Ambassador for #Salomon, the French outdoor performance brand, reflecting a shared vision shaped through outdoor lifestyle, fashion, and culture.

[JISOO CHARTS @jisooschart]

Cartier Global Ambassador #JISOO was featured in a VOGUE Business article as Richemont reported a 16% rise in jewelry sales in Q4 this year, outperforming the previous quarter's 14% growth and highlighting the continued strong demand for jewelry maisons including #Cartier.

[Adam Lavine @Ale__vine]

serius nih bawa bawa SNOWDROP?WOI... dr awal Snowdrop gk mlanggar sejarah mana pun mk'a mo dbawa kmn pun tu drama gk bs diberhentiin.pihak produksi kekeh berjuang krn mrka tau mrka benar dn gk mlanggar apa pun lah kasus PC mrka udh ngaku salah dn mnt maaf yah klian trima knyataan

[Filipe @filipe910910]

What happened with Snowdrop is a perfect masterclass in how these massive online historical panic-campaigns play out under Korean law versus internet noise.
When it aired, the public backlash against Snowdrop was arguably the most intense in modern K-drama history—significantly larger and more legally aggressive than anything happening now—yet absolutely nothing happened to the show. It finished its entire broadcast run safely and remains fully available on global streaming platforms.
The situation played out across three distinct fronts:
1. The Blue House Petition (The 365k Wall)
The online backlash exploded when early script leaks suggested a romance between a South Korean university student and a North Korean spy disguised as a democracy activist.
The Scale: A public petition demanding the government step in and stop production completely blew past the 200,000-signature threshold, eventually racking up over 365,000 signatures.
The Government's Response: The Presidential Blue Office officially rejected the petition. They stated that under Article 4 of Korea's Broadcasting Act, the state strictly guarantees the freedom and independence of media programming. They clarified that direct government intervention in creative works is a dangerous violation of free expression, declaring that the state must take a highly cautious approach and leave content evaluation to the choices of the private market, creators, and audiences.
2. The Court Battle (The Dismissed Injunction)
When the political petition route failed, an activist civic group took it straight to the legal system, filing a formal court injunction to force the cable network (JTBC) to stop broadcasting the drama immediately.
The Court's Ruling: The Seoul Western District Court completely dismissed the injunction.
The Legal Precedent: The judges ruled that even if a drama contains a distorted historical viewpoint, "it is difficult to believe that viewers will blindly accept it as fact." The court firmly established that simply offending a group of citizens' historical perspective does not meet the legal threshold required to infringe upon the public's right to view a fictional broadcast.
3. The Network's Self-Correction
Because the legal and governmental bodies refused to censor the show, the battle shifted entirely to public relations. JTBC didn't delete the drama; instead, they used internal edits to de-escalate the tension:
They completely renamed the female lead (originally named after a real-life democracy activist) to a fictional name.
They aired a special consecutive-episode block early in the schedule to prove to viewers that the plot wasn't glorifying spy agencies, which successfully took the steam out of the narrative.
Why This Precedent Matters:
The Snowdrop case is the ultimate legal shield. If a drama facing 365,000+ signatures and a formal court injunction was ruled legally protected under free expression laws—even while dealing with highly sensitive, real-world 1987 pro-democracy history—a 27k or 50k petition against a purely 架空 (fictional/alternate universe) modern royal drama like Perfect Crown stands zero chance.
The legal system simply does not delete international streaming content over internet comment threads
#PerfectCrown

[Adam Lavine @Ale__vine]

@N1ni160196 @pecintaanabul mana berita yang dr 2024 kok gk ada?? itu mah berita 2026.apa cm karangan bebas jendog doank nihh bilang kasus abang'a jisoo dr 2024??🙃🙃

[Adam Lavine @Ale__vine]

@N1ni160196 @pecintaanabul ayo gw msh nungguin loh ini..krn lo bahkn lbh tau dr gw yg fans'a.jd mana nih rumor abang'a jisoo dr 2024 yg lo bilang??mn nih pernyataan jisoo/blissoo yg bantah rumor abang'a ky yg lo bilang??
klo gk bisa jwb berarti lo mengakui fans jd tukang hoax

[Adam Lavine @Ale__vine]

@N1ni160196 @pecintaanabul yahh.. gni doank bacotan fans jennie pas klah debat?? mana tu rumor abang'a jisoo yg dr 2024 sm pernyataan jisoo/blissoo bantah rumor abang'a yg lo bilang kok gk bs lo tunjukin sih??
jd bner donk omongan gw "lo pd hobi ngarang sndri dkepala" pas dminta bukti gk bs jawab😂🤣

[Adam Lavine @Ale__vine]

@N1ni160196 @pecintaanabul yah iya lahh jisoo klarifikasi,dia ikut kna fitnah org org modelan ky lo gni krn klakuan abang'a.istri ke-2 abang'a aja udh bilang dia gk tau jisoo ade'a tu laki bahkn gk pernah ktmu klrga laki'a tp lo pd msh nyalahin jisoo yakali jisoo diem aja dfitnah org modelan klian🙃

[Adam Lavine @Ale__vine]

@N1ni160196 @pecintaanabul siapa yg bantah??klo yg lo mksd jisoo/blissoo gw mnt bukti pernyataan jisoo/blissoo yg bantah.trus mana yg kata lo rumor abang'a dr 2024 kok gk ada??
lah.. abang'a ngaku itu urusan dia yg psti jisoo dr 2025 udh cut off abang'a terbukti istri kedua abang'a gk tau jisoo ade tu laki

[Adam Lavine @Ale__vine]

@N1ni160196 @pecintaanabul pke tny lagi.. yah lo pada lahh fans'a🙃stan hoax udh gk bisa debat ngalur ngidul😂🤣
mana pernyataan jisoo/blissoo yg bantah rumor oppanya kok gk bales??trus mana tu rumor pelecehan oppanya yg lo bilang dr 2024 kok gk bales sih??

[Adam Lavine @Ale__vine]

@N1ni160196 @pecintaanabul gk smua org ky idol lo yg takut fans sm publik jd apa apa diumpetin mk'a lo pd hobi ngarang sndri dkepala krn kbiasaan idol lo gk mo jujur dn terbuka ke fans😂🤣

[Adam Lavine @Ale__vine]

@N1ni160196 @pecintaanabul dr awal jisoo/blissoo gk pernah bantah rumor abang'a klo skrg korban/istri kedua'a speak up yah hal mrka donk sbg korban.istri kedua oppanya aja bilang gk tau klo dia abang'a jisoo bahkan dia gk pernah ktmu klga si laki itu udh bukti jelas pernyataan jisoo valid

[Adam Lavine @Ale__vine]

@N1ni160196 @pecintaanabul mana tunjukin pernyataan jisoo/blissoo yg pernah bantah rumor pelecehan abang??skalian tunjukin rumor pelecehan beserta pernyataan bantahan jisoo/blissoo yang dr 2024

[Adam Lavine @Ale__vine]

@N1ni160196 @pecintaanabul dari awal ni mslh muncul mei thn 2025 stelah kakak'a cerai sama istrinya.lo bilang dr 2024 ni kasus gw tunggu bukti'a mana?minimal media pd beritain donk thn 2024 kasus kakaknya

[Adam Lavine @Ale__vine]

@N1ni160196 @pecintaanabul jd klo oppanya bkin mslh lg skrg yah jisoo berhak klarifikasi bela dirinya yg dsalahin sm kaum modelan lo pada yg suka nyalahin org yg gk salah

[Adam Lavine @Ale__vine]

@N1ni160196 @pecintaanabul yah itu bukti idol gw gk ada urusan sm klakuan buruk oppanya lah.. klo jisoo ngelindungin mah bkln diumpetin tuh mslh oppanya toh publik akhir'a tau klo jisoo udh cut off dr 1thn lalu sblum kasus oppanya yg skrg🙃

[Adam Lavine @Ale__vine]

@Dior Jisoo🥰🥰