The Salaf/Sahabah gave excuse of ignorance to a person doing the purest Istihlal
This is according to ibn Taymiyah
Khawarij say Istihlal is Shirk because he has made himself a Taghut
In this scenario an individual made alcohol Halal for a community
Translation in comments
@_zlx1 Imam Malik and Imam Ahmed responded I dont know to fiqhi questions and its mentioned imam ahmed knew about so much khilaf the rajih was not always clear to him
here hes using this to say its okay for Musa Jibril to not know Aqeedah and Tafsir of important Ayat
@Esam9dcm The difference between you and ibn baz is the difference musa jibril and any book of tafsir
bro said ”idk” to “popular” facts ibn taymiyah stated
“popular fact about abu hanifa” yeah congrats on seeing a viral tweet
ibn baz however taught the sunan and spent his life in ilm
Not knowing the authenticity of an Athar from the Salaf is not nearly as close to not know quotes and Tafsir of Ayat that your whole Dawah revolves around and specialize in
Not just the “I dont know” but the responses themselves were not scholarly like
“Madkhakis are Kuffar”
Ibn Taymiyah says: “Ahlul Sunnah & the people of knowledge do not Takfir those who oppose them, even if that person who opposes you makes Takfir on you”
And they call us liars lol while they don’t even know what they are talking about. It’s clear who are the liars lol.
I was worried cuz it has to do something with marriage lmao.
And from what it seems, it’s heading to a positive direction.
So yeah lol L for you bud, W for me.+
Like Shaykh Muhammed bin Ibrahim who admit the kingdom has errors but affirmed Islam for the King, same for all his students who are scholars today
Shaykh Muqbil mentioned the rulers of Egypt, Saudi, Yemen and said dont Takfir them despite their errors
They are Ahlul Sunnah
Nobody said to love the rulers
Most of the accusations people make are lies
Ahlul Sunnah say they are Muslims and do not make Takfir for their sins/short comings
Just like all the major Ulamah, for example for Saudi they admit they had errors but were still MUSLIMS
Madkhalis: The rulers are committing Kufr Duna Kufr every single day, they are the worst of sinners, they are Fasiqoon & Dhalimoon as per the Ayat of Hukm.
Also Madkhalis: We praise the rulers, whitewash & defend them & label those who don’t like them as Khawarij & Ikhwanis.
@Abu_torab_1448 Notice how he didnt question the takfir of other scholars, ask ur own brothers and theyll send you a videos of the shaykh saying he did not takfir jahmis so hes a Kaffir
Saying the Ayah applies upon Jews refutes Musa Jibril himself
Since the Jews held their Shariah better than the Quran obviously Kufr Duna Kufr doesnt apply to them
Not sure why these dummies called it “schooling”
He had no other argument and went straight to Takfir
The last fatwa of Shaykh Ibn Uthaymeen رحمه الله on ruling by other than what Allah has revealed.
The takfiris who claim him need to see this. Just remove his voice, and this is exactly what the "Madkhalis" say.
شهد شاهد من أهلها
One of the ikhwah sent me this: a Takfīrī speaking about the “viral” post regarding Mūsā Jibrīl, هداه الله. According to him, it was nothing but blunders, including mass takfīr of the Muslimeen.
This is now causing issues between these Takfīrīs themselves. The more Ḥāzimī-leaning ones are using Mūsā Jibrīl’s statement as proof for mass takfīr of the Muslimeen, while the non Ḥāzimī-leaning ones are coping and acting as if Mūsā Jibrīl has tafṣīlāt and defines a “Madk͟halī” in a certain way that justifies his mass takfīr.
Overall, may Allāh guide them all. They are all free from the Salafī manhaj, and it is free from them.
As for the individual who made this post, he claims he can refute the arguments that were raised in that phone call. I would love to discuss those exact same arguments and see him do a better job than Mūsā Jibrīl.
Amj fans are a huge spectrum of Takfir, so much Ikhtilaf
Those closer in resemblance to their Shaykh make Takfir on Shaykh Ibn Baz, Uthaymeen, Muqbil etc. and all people disagreeing with them
شهد شاهد من أهلها
One of the ikhwah sent me this: a Takfīrī speaking about the “viral” post regarding Mūsā Jibrīl, هداه الله. According to him, it was nothing but blunders, including mass takfīr of the Muslimeen.
This is now causing issues between these Takfīrīs themselves. The more Ḥāzimī-leaning ones are using Mūsā Jibrīl’s statement as proof for mass takfīr of the Muslimeen, while the non Ḥāzimī-leaning ones are coping and acting as if Mūsā Jibrīl has tafṣīlāt and defines a “Madk͟halī” in a certain way that justifies his mass takfīr.
Overall, may Allāh guide them all. They are all free from the Salafī manhaj, and it is free from them.
As for the individual who made this post, he claims he can refute the arguments that were raised in that phone call. I would love to discuss those exact same arguments and see him do a better job than Mūsā Jibrīl.
@Esam9dcm hey knuckle head
how about read it
heres another quote, unless you dont know what a Khalifa is you cant have Khilafa with Muluk, its 1 imam over all Muslims
@Esam9dcm You must be retarded to claim theres khilafah in imam ahmeds time just like ur shaykh
Heres a quote from Ibn Kathir and there are a lot like this, saying there was no Khilafah 30 years after the prophet ﷺ
I also alr posted from MBAW something similar
@Esam9dcm i guess ibn taymiyah is a jahil for saying not everyone who does kufr is to be called a kaffir 100 times and multiple narrations from the salaf implying that
quit the cope there wasnt a single ruler ruling over all muslims
If you want to see Jahl watch Musa Jibrils phone call