@Avazoey_ U think u are special and non violent? Nop u are just too weak for straightforward violence on average, also if we see what happens in nature when females are stronger then there are 0 differences
@njp_1@johannesmkx U dont undrestand how normal it felt because we were never on contant war on this era, but if u put war in the equation u will undrestand
@njp_1@johannesmkx the concept of constant wars died recently because of the nuclear weapons, it is very hard and convinience to accept u to be equal with me when the risk of dying belongs only to me, ofc today if someone says that it's 100% different case
@Based_BG In Balkans is much easier to trace the culture but not the DNA. DNA is a mess ,not only because of religious converts, but because during uprisings we had many times nations be converted too another nationality (even before Ottomans). Opinion ofc.
@BraunStatue96@InsaneCope Many times in history we have had progress in science, but most of the time it happened because of a superpower or a previous superpower, religion is just religion.
U don't colapse instantly ,but in waves
@InsaneCope the the winner (AFTER THE WARS) can buy any scientists and he doesn't give a fuck that u are weak now U dont become weak instantly, it takes time-civil wars-defeats etc etc, but u gather 'errors' that at some point u will pay for that, science is more related to war in general
@InsaneCope Religion and science in general are unrelated things, I'm atheist too but I don't see a relation-cause, it's a corelation, the science is related to wars more but not directly, just win your wars with minimal resources, because if u spend to much and u need to replace too much...
@DIAS 2 brownish groups were in Greece early on (if we want accuracy), the minoan group and some phoinician cities later, when city state was alive as system (no kingdoms OR empires) 'invading' with colonies was the norm.
Nothing more nothing less
@aravosis I don't think is bad on crying 'it wasn't like that', but u dont need to view the situation as disaster, it is an exaggeration, saying 'no it was like that' it's the same too (exaggeration). Whatever...
@Pagratiotiki Νταξει μπορει να πει καποιος οτι το Ιεροξυλο (πως λεμε Ιεραπετρα) γουσταρει να αναμηγνυει χρονικες περιοδους και ασχετα lores και ��α μεινουμε εκει. Δεν φοβουνται μη χαζεψει ο πληθυσμος τους γιατι κλεβουν απο αλλους ετσι και αλλιως xD
@nonregemesse meele cavalry and chariot wouldn't even scratch them.
These 'details' play role, also soldier trainning can't change instantly in one day, u have specific structures.
@nonregemesse The persian armies look like early steppe armies, the Greek army of Alexander was an organised total counter to them, horse archers vs normal archers but u can hide behind phalanx that can face easier horse charges.
Sarissas even if they were vulnureble against archers
@nonregemesse The real conclusion is that all nations are made up, for many reasons. I don't disagree on that. The mitochondria in cells were different cells in the begin, now we don't say this is not a real cell it has mitochondria inside xD
@magattew The real problem with rules is not in the intention, but how the rules actually work based on human nature,it is not always the intention bad.
On the other hand u cant have 'an army' with more generals than soldiers for example, this is bad logistics
@Based_BG Ι like tracking things with continiuty, I'm not obsessed with our nationalist myths (everyone has, I'm not gonna lie), but what I dont like in Americans (holywood) is that they are breaking the sense of continiuty