Alex Carrington

Be Kind.

[Concerned Citizen @BGatesIsaPyscho]

England, Canada, Germany, France, Spain, Italy, Australia, Holland, Portugal, Belgium, Austria & most other Westernised Countries - the same thing is happening

You are being replaced on purpose

Or just keep calling it another Conspiracy Theory

[Julia Hartley-Brewer @JuliaHB1]

I'm don't support capital punishment but, if I did, I'm pretty sure that men who brutally rape and torture young girls for years would be high up on my execution list.

[Nick Buckley MBE @NickBuckleyMBE]

Rioters in France, rob and strip an old couple in the street. They are lucky to be alive.
This was reported yesterday on French news outlets.
A backlash must be coming.

[Andrew Bridgen @ABridgen]

Even the Express have noticed that the BBC engages in brainwashing via propaganda. The young are just the most prone to it.
The Government want to make the ‘open borders’ concept accepted as the norm.
No country can remain a country without borders.
No public service free at the point of need is sustainable with open borders.
This is the deliberate destruction of the UK and Europe facilitated by our so called ‘leaders’ it’s treason.

https://t.co/VBRHh9xz1p

[Matt Goodwin @GoodwinMJ]

I support the suspension of Reform activists who said outrageous things. But I also oppose efforts to use a few bad apples to shut down debate about Islam, grooming gangs and mass immigration.

[Dr Clare Craig ✝️ @ClareCraigPath]

Folic acid must be avoided by millions and yet the government is adding it to our flour!

Sign the petition.

[Benonwine @benonwine]

What a smart young man.

He’s gonna go very far in life.

He’s just saying what everybody else is thinking. 👏👏👏

Immigrants who won’t assimilate are pushing out the English in our own communities.

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

Farage apparently thinks the question of Englishness is an “academic debate”, in his words, that is not worth engaging in - a simply extraordinary thing to say.

We are witnessing profound demographic change across Britain, and the leader of Reform thinks the meaning of English identity is a subject to be brushed aside because he’s scared of being called a few unpleasant names.

Englishness is NOT an academic debate.

The English are a historic people. We have our own ancestry, heritage, culture, traditions and national identity.

Incredibly, Farage disagrees with that.

My view, and Restore Britain's view, is clear.

We are not simply a collection of passport holders living within a geographical boundary.

And acknowledging the existence of the historic English people does not mean denying that others can develop a genuine attachment and belonging to our nation, but that does not make them ethnically English.

A government can print a passport, sadly we all know that - it CANNOT falsely manufacture centuries of history or ancestral roots.

The historic English people have a home - it’s called England, and we have nowhere else to go.

And yes, in that home, the English are being demographically replaced. That’s just a fact. It’s happening all over Britain, it’s happened all over Britain. Go to East London, Rochdale, Luton, Birmingham, Blackburn, Bradford. I could go on.

This is NOT an academic debate.

This is our home, or at least it was.

Farage is simply not the man to save it.

You cannot claim to defend a nation when you refuse to even acknowledge its historic people because you might get your feelings hurt.

The hour is simply too late for that pathetic level of gutlessness.

The English are not an academic abstract afterthought.

We will not have our history and entire existence erased because cowardly politicians don’t have the courage to state the truth.

We are a people, and England is our home.

Restore Britain will defend it.

[Raja Miah @recusant_raja]

ANDY BURNHAM'S REVIEW DECLARED THERE WAS NO COVER-UP OF CHILDREN BEING GANG RAPED IN OLDHAM. THE POLICE FORCE HE WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR NEVER GAVE HIS REVIEWERS FULL ACCESS TO ITS RECORDS. HE CALLED THEIR WORK THOROUGH.

Within 32 days Labour had used it to shut down the scandal. Burnham stood by it for two and a half years.

BURNHAM'S REVIEW CLEARED OLDHAM WITHOUT THE EVIDENCE IT NEEDED

In November 2019 the Labour leader of Oldham Council asked Andy Burnham, then Mayor of Greater Manchester and the region’s Police and Crime Commissioner, for a review into the rape gang scandal in the town. Burnham commissioned it. It took 31 months and was published on 20 June 2022.

Burnham’s own review held the evidence of a cover-up and explained it away. It found that the police told the BBC there were just two pieces of intelligence on the shisha bars, when their own officers had filed several. That was a lie told to a journalist to kill a story about children being raped, and the review called it proportionate.

It found the council had put the girls most at risk under one roof, where the men could find them. When a care worker reported men circling the home waiting for those girls, the review sided with the council and dismissed the worker without ever interviewing them.

Greater Manchester Police, the force Burnham was responsible for, never gave his reviewers full access to its underlying records, and Oldham Council redacted key information. The cases of the ten children it examined were locked away in confidential appendices.

Then Burnham's so called expert team declared there was no evidence of a senior-level cover-up.

LABOUR USED BURNHAM'S REVIEW TO SHUT DOWN THE SCANDAL IN 32 DAYS

Labour politicians seized on its conclusions the day it was published. Jim McMahon, MP for Oldham West and Royton, Debbie Abrahams, MP for Oldham East and Saddleworth, and Angela Rayner, the party's deputy leader, dismissed the allegations as conspiracy theories and declared that a line had been drawn under the scandal. On 30 June, ten days after publication, McMahon attacked me by name in Parliament.

On 13 July, the opposition brought a motion to Oldham Council demanding an independent public inquiry, with its terms set independently of Greater Manchester and Oldham Council. Its title called for an inquiry "including the actions and knowledge of Council Members and Officers." The motion said the council could not move forward until the unanswered questions were addressed.

Oldham's Labour council leader Amanda Chadderton moved an amendment that cut all of it. The demand for an independent inquiry went, and so did any scrutiny of council members and officers. In their place she wrote "We must move forward."

The council adopted her amended motion by 32 votes to 20. The review had been public for 23 days, and Oldham Labour had already used it to strike out any investigation of themselves. The council offered Operation Sherwood, survivor support and oversight groups instead.

On 22 July, Burnham wrote an open letter to the people of Oldham. He told them he was very grateful to his reviewers for the thorough way in which they had undertaken their work.

His reviewers had written in their own report that they could not examine the police source records, and that this limited their conclusions and the assurance they could give him.

Burnham's letter said nothing about it. He made no admission that they had no power to compel witnesses, and he gave no explanation of why the children's cases were locked in confidential appendices. He presented Operation Sherwood as the way forward.

BURNHAM STOOD BY IT UNTIL HE HAD NO CHOICE

For another two and a half years, Burnham maintained his position. Only in January 2025, under extraordinary public pressure, did he acknowledge the need for an inquiry with powers to compel evidence. Even then, he proposed a limited national inquiry drawing on the same assurance reviews.

The national statutory inquiry was finally conceded in June 2025, almost three years after his Oldham report. Had Burnham and the Labour politicians who used that report to close down the scandal succeeded, the National Inquiry would not exist.

My position is clear. Andy Burnham, the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, is neck deep in the cover up of the Pakistani Rape Gangs.

THE PRIME MINISTER MUST BE DRAGGED BEFORE THE NATIONAL INQUIRY

Andy Burnham leads the government responsible for the National Inquiry. His review was used to hold it off for almost three years.

The National Inquiry must call him to give evidence under oath. He must explain why he called a review thorough when his own police force had kept its records from it, why he said nothing while Oldham Labour used it to vote down an inquiry into its own members and officers, and why he defended it for two and a half years while his Labour colleagues used it to attack the people exposing what was done to these children.

The girls raped in Oldham's shisha bars and children's homes were told in 2022 that nobody had covered anything up. The man who told them went on to become Prime Minister. He must answer to them under oath. So must every other Labour Party politician involved in Oldham.

Raja Miah MBE

_________

You know what we are up against. The mainstream media will not touch my work. Institutions I investigate do not volunteer their records. Politicians do not suddenly decide to hold themselves to account.

And yet, despite all of that, we forced the national inquiry. We did that because enough ordinary people refused to go away.

But getting the inquiry was never the end of this campaign. In many ways it was only the beginning. Now we have to watch where it goes, what it investigates, which places it avoids, which witnesses it calls, which records it obtains and whether the same institutions that failed these children are allowed to control the story again.

Nobody else is going to do that work for us. And I cannot do it indefinitely working on my own. That is why I keep talking about 50,000 committed subscribers.

It is not a vanity number. I did not pluck it out of the air. With fifty thousand people with me means when we uncover something important, it does not depend on a newspaper editor, a television producer or an algorithm deciding whether you are allowed to see it.

It gives us reach they cannot easily shut down.

But there is another reason. I need to build a proper backroom operation around this work. At the moment I am investigating, researching, writing, publishing, producing the videos, running the newsletter, dealing with the technology and then starting again. It is unsustainable.

I need people behind me who can take care of the technical and production work so that I can spend my time doing the thing I do best. That is why we have been pushing so hard for new paid subscribers.

🔴 SIGN UP HERE
👉 https://t.co/mZBZnScays

If you read my work and want it to continue, I need your help. Sign up for free. There are no paywalls to access any of my work. If you can afford the £3 a month or £30 for the year, please become a paid subscriber.

We forced the inquiry. Now we need the numbers to make sure they cannot control what happens next.

Unfortunately, we are reaching the end of the road where I can continue working this way.

The paid subscriptions have stalled. Worse, tens of thousands of people are now reading these articles without even joining the free mailing list. The audience is growing, but the number of people actually standing behind the work is not growing with it.

This is becoming impossible to sustain.

Raja Miah MBE

[Lee Harris @LeeHarris]

Every single word of this is perfect. @ada_akpala calls out Islamist blasphemy laws through the back door, two-tier free speech, two-tier policing, and two-tier justice in one go.

Absolute silence in the room
Because she's right

Utterly brilliant 👏👏👏

[Nick Buckley MBE @NickBuckleyMBE]

France. Remember this video for you are going to see exactly the same thing in the UK. We invited low IQ monsters to live among us and seem not to understand that monsters always remain monsters.

[The Free Speech Union @SpeechUnion]

A mother was referred to Prevent and visited by police at home because of her visit to Israel and her interest in“Jewish issues”.

In yet another shocking case, Holly Passmore, a mother of two from County Durham, was visited at home last July by two plain-clothes police officers who wanted to know why she had recently travelled to Israel.

The officers told Ms Passmore, who cares for her severely autistic nine-year-old son, that it was a “safeguarding issue”.

A police intelligence report seen by The Telegraph reveals that the referral said she “over-identified with the conflict between Israel and Palestine” and was “supportive of Israel to the point that she has travelled to Israel”. It also described her as having “MH” — meaning mental health — issues and being “vulnerable to negative influence”.

Three days after the visit, Ms Passmore lodged a complaint. Two more officers, including a superintendent, then came to her home.

“They said that, clearly, I’m not a terrorist,” she recalled, explaining that they were keen to reassure her that police did not consider her a threat or an extremist.

“I thought that was strange at the time. You don’t usually end up with a superintendent on your couch.”

Ms Passmore’s concerns deepened when she discovered that her NHS records had been updated to describe her as a “vulnerable adult”, before later being changed to say she was no longer vulnerable.

It is now even more clear that Prevent is being weaponised by activists to silence people for their lawful and legitimate views.

These vexatious complaints also waste police time and resources.

Enough is enough.

Read more in @Telegraph 👇

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

Why would young white British lads fight for a state that so obviously despises them?

[Matt Goodwin @GoodwinMJ]

🚨This is utterly outrageous. Look at who they are letting into Britain. An Islamist ISIS terrorist who belonged to a gang that BEHEADED people like Ken Bigley is walking FREE on Britain's streets.

Mohammed Yaseen was part of a gang that oversaw brutal public executions.

He entered Britain illegally on a small boat.

He was put in a taxpayer-funded hotel in Basingstoke.

He was sent to prison for two-years but was just released after serving just six months.

He was just moved to a hostel in Windsor, also paid for by British taxpayers, and was seen shopping near Windsor Castle by the Mail on Sunday.

What is happening to our country.

[Kathy Gray @FOI_Terrier]

@paulfrewDUP @JimShannonMP @carlalockhart @JimAllister @ClaireHanna @RupertLowe10 @YvetteCooperMP @RobbieButlerMLA @ClareCraigPath
THIS IS TOTALLY UNETHICAL AND UNACCEPTABLE, Nuremberg Code, ethical principles. Its central rule is voluntary, informed consent is essential.

[Ada @ada_akpala]

"Protect her.” “Be careful.” “I pray for your safety.”

That’s what people have been telling me, privately and in the comments.

Nobody says that when you criticise the government. Nobody says it when you criticise the Church. They say it when you talk about Islam.

[Nick Buckley MBE @NickBuckleyMBE]

I am beginning to hate the Free Palestine idiots. Our history belongs to us - not to anyone else.

[John Cleese @JohnCleese]

Unless this party thrives, the future is lost for people like me

But...I'm lucky enough to be able to move abroad

Most people can't

[Alex Carrington @AlexCar19822448]

@medwaymakem @LeeHarris Didn't Boris buy water cannons?
Then Khan sold them for scrap?

[Dr Clare Craig ✝️ @ClareCraigPath]

Here is what hospital admissions for either flu OR covid look like.

They are lowest in years...