@Only1GodExists@JamesKowalski88 You don’t even realize how stupid you sound defending him.
Bro, he lied to you!
People are trying to point that out to you and you’re defending him.
@Only1GodExists@JamesKowalski88 You wouldn’t know circular reasoning if an illiterate man claimed to be a prophet and told you corrupted stories as proof and then when people see his stories are corrupted he claimed they couldn’t be because he was a prophet.
@Only1GodExists@JamesKowalski88 Mr. Gullible do you really think God sent an angel to a man with instructions to that man to tell people, “Go bite your father’s dick”.
Mr. Gullible, does that sound like how an Angel speaks or who God speaks to?
You’re just scared of Muhammad’s threats, but you should be scared of following a liar.
Quran 9:30 shows you how to debunk Muhammad. Jews don’t believe God had a son. That’s obvious. Everyone knows.
Alexander the Great didn’t have horns or build a giant wall to keep out Gog and Magog.
Solomon was wise and had knowledge, he didn’t have magic powers to talk to animals and insects.
The stones for the Temple were quarried and carved by King Hiram of Tyre, not by jinn.
Solomon didn’t die while watching jinn.
Amram was the father of Moses, Aaron and their sister Miriam. Many Jewish woman were named Miriam after Miriam. Jesus’ mother was named after Miriam - she wasn’t actually the daughter of Imran and sister of Aaron.
Time to wake up and grow up and stop following an evil path.
Maybe you’ll learn something new from my reply:
1. You didn’t answer my questions. Read our thread.
2. I don’t believe the Gospels or Christianity or Jesus being a Messiah. So you didn’t get anyone but yourself.
(Hey genius, maybe if you find problems with the Gospels, and they find problems with you the reason is because you both have problems?)
3. Deuteronomy 21:22-23 talks about someone hung from a tree. Crucifixion wasn’t done on a tree. Once wood is chopped and turned into something else it’s not a tree. It’s also a commandment on the Israelites, and Christians would say it doesn’t apply to someone that Romans hung unjustly. The hanging isn’t what makes someone cursed, it’s their crime that makes them cursed.
4. Islam also claims Jesus was hung on a cross. Muhammad just copied Mani, the prophet of Manicheaism’s claim that he didn’t die on the cross, it just looked like he did. That doesn’t solve the problem Islam also has that he was hung there - which implies Islam also believes he’s cursed but Islam also views him as a messiah.
Copying manicheaism is also a stupid plagiarism. Muhammad did it a lot in his claims of being a prophet.
5. If you’re going to quote the Torah as your evidence against Christianity, then the Torah can also be used as evidence against Islam. Otherwise you’re a hypocrite. In which case Muhammad is a liar who changed the Torah laws, and not an Israelite so couldn’t be a prophet. Go look up the requirements for a prophet in the Torah, and what disqualifies someone as a false prophet.
There were also people who claimed to be prophets before and after Muhammad…. So what’s your point?
You’re just playing on fear, but you should be scared of following a liar.
Quran 9:30 shows you how to debunk Muhammad. Jews don’t believe God had a son. That’s obvious. Everyone knows.
Alexander the Great didn’t have horns or build a giant wall to keep out Gog and Magog.
Solomon was wise and had knowledge, he didn’t have magic powers to talk to animals and insects.
The stones for the Temple were quarried and carved by King Hiram of Tyre, not by jinn.
Solomon didn’t die while watching jinn.
Amram was the father of Moses, Aaron and their sister Miriam. Many Jewish woman were named Miriam after Miriam. Jesus’ mother was named after Miriam - she wasn’t actually the daughter of Imran and sister of Aaron.
Time to wake up and grow up and stop following an evil path.
You don’t get salvation by stubbornly following a liar. That’s obvious.
Who was dhul al-qarnayn, and did he have real horns and build a giant wall to keep out Gog and Magog? Or was that a late antiquity historical fantasy from Alexander The Great’s association with Amun-Zeus on coins.
Do Jews believe God has a son, or was that a false accusation?
Did historical Haman live in Egypt or Persia?
Do Christians believe Miriam was part of the Trinity, or was that a false accusation?
What was the name of Aaron and Moses’ sister, and what was the name of their father?
What do these names/words mean in Arabic: Jibril, Adam, Jehinnam?
In Christianity the supreme Deceiver is who? In Islam the Supreme Deceiver is who?
You don’t get to heaven by following a liar.
Who was dhul al-qarnayn, and did he have real horns and build a giant wall to keep out Gog and Magog? Or was that a late antiquity historical fantasy.
Do Jews believe God has a son, or was that a false accusation?
Did historical Haman live in Egypt or Persia?
Do Christians believe Miriam was part of the Trinity, or was that a false accusation?
What was the name of Aaron and Moses’ sister, and what was the name of their father?
What do these names/words mean in Arabic: Jibril, Adam, Jehinnam?
In Christianity the supreme Deceiver is who? In Islam the Supreme Deceiver is who?
Who was dhul al-qarnayn, and did he have real horns and build a giant wall to keep out Gog and Magog? Or was that a late antiquity historical fantasy tale.
Do Jews believe God has a son, or was that a false accusation?
Did historical Haman live in Egypt or Persia?
Do Christians believe Miriam was part of the Trinity, or was that a false accusation?
What was the name of Aaron and Moses’ sister, and what was the name of their father?
What do these names/words mean in Arabic: Jibril, Adam, Jehinnam?
In Christianity the supreme Deceiver is who? In Islam the Supreme Deceiver is who?
In the Jewish tradition, Satan is an adversary, opponent, accuser who talks against God (not a fiery hell demon with horns) and tests someone’s righteousness.
In a psychological sense, Judaism and Christianity elevate a God with the desired, admired values. That’s a psychological role in the mind’s eye. The paragon of those values to aspire to.
So the snake in the garden of Eden which convinces Eve to oppose God’s command for her self interest becomes associated with a tool of Satan and the evil inclination.
So Satanic, could, from a psychological perspective, mean ideologies and people that disparage, demoralize, attack, and talk against that paragon of values.
He’s a symptom, an output, of a corrupted process.
Unless you fix the corruption in the process, similar outputs will keep repeating.
Anatomy of a Machine / System:
Input —> Process / Function —> Output
The process and functions are corrupted here.
The people who promoted him need to go too.
Punishing corruption warns off corrupters.
@oguzerkan@BillAckman Empower showed that a ride calling app is something of a commodity.
Their pricing is 30% lower than Uber.
https://t.co/UsfuXTK2iZ
There are two different statistical approaches to a question like this.
What wasn’t mentioned, but that evolutionary biologists would be more comfortable with is Bayesian inference.
Bayesian inference begins with prior probabilities based on existing evidence and updates them as new evidence arrives. It does not assume a blank slate. It asks: given what we already know and these new data, how probable is each competing hypothesis?
In contrast, Classical hypothesis testing begins with a chosen null hypothesis.
That null is often “no difference,” but it does not have to be - it can be “there is a difference”. And this later method is used in practical application like pharmacology.
For example, in comparing a new medicine with an existing medicine (non-inferiority and equivalence testing), the null is that treatments are different until sufficient evidence shows they are equivalent.
Another common mistake people make when applying hypothesis testing is that if a study fails to reject the null, especially for insufficient evidence, that does not prove the null is true.
It means only that there was insufficient evidence to reject the particular null that was chosen. A common mistake is to treat “failed to reject” as “proved true.”
European Christians, starting with the Catholic Spanish, the Portuguese, the Dutch, and then the British, drove the slave trade, just accept the history even if you don’t like the outcome.
Europeans killed each other in the Dutch Portuguese war, the Anglo-Dutch war and the war of Spanish succession for who would control the slave trade.
Only losers blame the Jews.