@AustAnglican@StJohnsBrisbane Good clarification regarding the date of photo, which clearly shows that Peter Hollingworth attended. 2013 was before the RC case study reports (from approx Feb 2017) but still after the Brisbane Diocese report I believe.
@Picketer The Hollingworth situation is a complete scandal. Iโve personally asked the current Archbishop (Freier) to resign in connection with own behaviour regarding him (both continuing to licence Hollingworth for ministry after the RC CEBS report was published and โฆ
@FrenchProfessor Personally, I donโt think Anglicans resolve theological disagreements through Synod or Lambeth resolutions - indeed Lambeth 1.10 is a good practical example of that - because neither Synod nor Lambeth are sources of ultimate authority
@FrenchProfessor But this is a different point. Thereโs nothing inherently wrong or contradictory about reaffirming the original resolution. Your argument now seems to be about the wisdom (or otherwise) of doing so.
@FrenchProfessor Not quite - itโs the authors of the subsection report who state that they did not have a common mind on various questions. By contrast Lambeth 1.10 is the (overwhelming) view of the bishops attending in 1998 (presumably after having considered the subsection report).