🍢Banana Mint Smoothie The smoothie is mintyYour journey does not need to mirror anyone else’s timeline. Move at your own pace and trust that your season of breakthrough will arrive exactly when it should.
Those same people are telling you to feel sorry for a mother who strangled her children, one-by-one, for several minutes said that a 32 old mom deserved to die because she worked a midlevel corporate job at Bank of America. This is the *mainstream* of the Democrat party.
If Lindsay Clancy strangled 3 adopted kids who were all black, all the leftists defending her would flip their position immediately and the case would’ve been all about ensuring that she got the death penalty. My position would always be that she’s a killer deserving of the death penalty.
Angry women in my feed: “Men commit more murders!!!”
A. The point is not only the murder but the SUPPORT you are giving the murderer.
And
B.
-Murders: 14,085 (2025)
-Abortions: 1,126,000 (2025)
When you call ours murder and yours “healthcare” it really skews the stats.
A "jury of one's peers" seems like an outdated idea at this point. The general public is brainrotted to fuck and will apparently abandon all logic if they see some retarded TikToks about your case.
I'm really tired of this trend of people having incredible sympathy for criminals, whilst their victims become a minor footnote. A mere afterthought.
I've seen it over and over again now.
This is the type of moral inversion that could literally destroy the West.
Remember this guy? He shot and killed his little kids with a spearfishing gun in Mexico.
He claimed his 2-year-old son and 10-month-old daughter were infected with “serpent DNA.” He needed to kill them, he said, to protect other people from the monsters they would become.
Does this drum up the same sympathy as Lindsay Clancy, ladies?
Just an overwhelmed, confused, sweet dad, failed by the system who clearly loved his kids and deserves our sympathy? Am I doing this right?
Black activists rallying around Karmelo Anthony. Leftists celebrating Charlie Kirk’s murder. Women forming fan clubs for Lindsay Clancy. The last 12 months have been the darkest I can remember. Something has been revealed about our society. These people have showed us who they really are, and we can never unsee it. “Radicalized” doesn’t really even begin to describe the effect all of this has had on some of us.
These people support 3rd trimester abortions. A fully formed baby. Of course they support killing kids. None of this is surprising. There’s no biological difference between a third trimester baby and a toddler. That’s what they support.
A distinction is lost in the debate about insanity and the insanity defense. Nobody denies that insanity is a real phenomenon. Insane people exist. Recently I saw a homeless guy on the street corner, half naked, unwashed, engaged in a heated dispute with a lamp post. He was very obviously insane. He had no idea where he was, who he was, or what he was doing. If he ever killed someone, which it’s perfectly likely he will, I would agree that he had very little control over it. Although he still (even more so, if anything) needs to be locked away forever.
The real debate is about the concept of “temporary insanity.” The question is where a functional, coherent person — someone capable of living as a normal member of society, and engaging in normal conversations and showing an ability to plan for the future and fulfill their basic obligations and do all the stuff normal people do — could nonetheless suddenly go insane and lose all agency, only to quickly regain agency and be somehow not crazy again.
I think this idea is mostly mythological, something out of the movies and not real life. And at any rate, it’s totally unfalsifiable. It could never be proved or disproved. There is no way at all, ever, to determine what was happening inside the conscious mind of a currently sane person weeks or months ago at a specific moment in time. And so even if “temporary insanity” is a real thing — which I highly doubt — it would still be absolutely impossible to demonstrate or prove, and literally any criminal for all we know could have been “temporarily insane” at the time of their crime.
Our only choice then is to hold currently sane people entirely accountable for the crimes they committed, no matter what they were or weren’t thinking at the time. And as for currently insane people, we can feel very sorry for them if we want to, but they too have to be locked away forever for the good of society and the sake of the innocents they can never be trusted to be around. So all of this is a long way of saying that this whole debate is ultimately, or should be ultimately, irrelevant.
The more nonsensical and obviously absurd a belief is, the more people who hold it (or pretend to) will resist recanting. The potential for humiliation rises in direct proportion to the ridiculousness of what they've publicly swallowed. They see no choice but to double down.
A few years ago, there was a woman who drowned her baby, and stabbed her husband and teenage daughter.
She was acquitted on grounds of 'insanity' induced by COVID.
I'm not joking... Look it up.
The justice system does need reform. Just not how most people think.