Alex McCue

Proposing a working hypothesis to test alternative mechanisms, focusing on an electrical event and the digital manipulation cover-up after the fact.

[Alex McCue @AlexandriaMcCue]

@Kimchi464741 @wtshesaid72 @NewJerzeyRebell @Iamnotalive2day @Edgei8v @AngelZoe1111 @OneKnightFury @ChewingTheVoid @CharlotteLee_88 @MuppetMasher I agree. I think she wanted as close to a front-row seat as she could possibly get.

[Alex McCue @AlexandriaMcCue]

Other researchers have noted the distinct uniform footwear worn by the 12-man security detail, suggesting it was to handle a static-sensitive explosive trigger inside a RØDE microphone housing unit. But when you factor in not only the footwear, but also the physical mechanics of the setup and the actual environmental landscape on the ground that day, it exposes a completely different electrical alternative.

If you look closely at the actual logistics on the ground at the event at UVU, the security team didn't handle any of the three microphones that were used to some extent at the event. From the footage we're given, only Charlie handled the main wired Shure SM58 microphone. The separate wireless RØDE mic was placed by that one guy, but it was worn inside his shirt. This is a non-standard placement for normal audio; however, it would be perfectly placed to capture the resounding acoustic signature of an electrical arc blast.

The only crew adjustments made to any of the mics were on the audience speaker's mic, and they were handled by only two guys on the A/V team. When the first speaker was speaking, the guy in the red t-shirt and red hat adjusted the audience speaker's mic while Terrell Farnsworth instructed him, but Terrell mostly kept his arms crossed (which was a standard protocol and an operational signal used by certain perimeter operators throughout the whole T-minus-10-minute countdown as a "Pause Execution Queue"), and never touched it himself. And right after this, still during the first speaker's questions, Terrell started to go back to the mic, but instead, the A/V guy in the black t-shirt and the black hat with the full beard made some adjustments at the base of the mic stand.

After Hunter Kozak touched the mic to readjust it, he got yelled at, and the guy with the red hat and the red t-shirt did the second mic adjustment for Kozak, and this is when Terrell went under the tent to instruct Charlie to reorient the mic's positioning so that its line-of-sight would realign to match the 4K camera placement overhead. Again, Terrell did not touch the mic, and immediately upon walking back out from under the tent, his arms went back into the crossed position.

This is where the uniform footwear signature becomes a compelling piece of data. While blast handlers utilize thick rubber dielectric boots as insulators, this team wore matching industrial ESD (Electrostatic Dissipative) grounders. This ESD footwear features a distinct conductive electrode disk in the heel sole, which is designed to bleed electrical potentials continuously straight into the absolute earth baseline. The team wasn't protecting their own skin from a shock; they were acting as human grounding rods to stabilize a highly volatile live-current matrix over a floating potential stage.

While Charlie was positioned on an elevated stage operating at a separate floating potential, the 12 perimeter guards moving over the damp turf needed to maintain absolute grounding continuity with the earth. By keeping the squad equal with the ground's potential, they established an operational baseline. This ensured that as they navigated the raw terrain to secure the site, rush to veil Charlie, and then handle the heavy tactical cable removal, their bodies wouldn't introduce unexpected secondary circuit paths or accidental arc flashes to the active environment.

I'm curious now if we know what kind of shoes a few of the other folks were wearing that day, namely: the red-hat girl with the backpack and the telephoto lens; the black-hat guy with the black t-shirt and the backpack and the telephoto lens; the red-hat guy with the red t-shirt who touched the speaker's mic; and the other black-hat guy with the black t-shirt and full beard, who had no backpack or camera, but who adjusted the base of the speaker's mic. Can we see the shoes of anyone else who was actively in the perimeter of the volatile "Pre-Activated Perimeter Zone"?

I post more in-depth articles here on X in the Articles section, but my full forensic research and breakdown is actively being added on Substack. I'm currently fleshing this out into a more exhaustive and organized dossier with detailed articles and reports, searchable data tables, structural charts, and deep-dive breakdowns over on Substack. https://t.co/XXnZTwl8g9

[Alex McCue @AlexandriaMcCue]

@wtshesaid72 @Iamnotalive2day @Kimchi464741 @Edgei8v @AngelZoe1111 @NewJerzeyRebell @OneKnightFury @ChewingTheVoid @CharlotteLee_88 @MuppetMasher No I haven't seen that one I don't think. I'll go look for it, though.

[Alex McCue @AlexandriaMcCue]

Agreed. And it's like, what is this kid in this white t-shirt doing??? It looks like he's signaling out to the perimeter somewhere.
To me, the first signal seems to indicate that the SM58 mic is now live.
The second signal with the fists coming together seems to indicate that Charlie is about to grab the live mic with both fists in order to close the circuit.
And the third signal, which would have been made right after Charlie's hands came together, could hypothetically indicate that the circuit has now been broken.
This would make sense if Dan's signal at that same moment is, in fact, the signal that mirrors Rick's action of pulling the pin to break the circuit, which would then make the stage much less dangerous (but not quite "safe") for the security team in their little booties to rush in.

[Matthew Hoopes @NewJerzeyRebell]

@AlexandriaMcCue @wtshesaid72 @Iamnotalive2day @OneKnightFury @Kimchi464741 @Edgei8v @AngelZoe1111 @IanCarrollShow @RealCandaceO @baroncoleman Also its very coincidental that when Dan makes his "signal" camouflage guy makes his sus motion, Farnsworth does his stomp and white shirt kid makes sus motion too. The kid on charlies right who's been said to have a palm gun or something. Its def sus 🤨 w.e it is

[Alex McCue @AlexandriaMcCue]

@AngelZoe1111 @Kimchi464741 @baroncoleman @wtshesaid72 @Iamnotalive2day @NewJerzeyRebell @ChewingTheVoid @OneKnightFury @Edgei8v Oh, lol, I gotcha! Thanks for the support! 💖

[Alex McCue @AlexandriaMcCue]

I could be wrong, but it's not an entirely unreasonable question to ask.

[Alex McCue @AlexandriaMcCue]

For sure. I really don't have any idea either, I'm just kind of trying to find ways to rule things out and then see what's left that still could be possible. I actually started reading a lot of your stuff because it made the most sense to me out of everything else I had heard just from a purely scientific point of view.

I’ve been leaning into an electrical mechanism since I watched the episode where @RealCandaceO showed that crumpled, burnt piece in the back of the SUV. The second I saw it, I was convinced that whatever happened couldn't have been a simple squib or even a squib gone wrong. Whatever that material was in the SUV (and I suspect it might be a package of unopened aluminum-wrapped petroleum burn gauze), it had clearly been hit with a high-density electrical current. At first, I definitely considered an EMP alternative, but there's still a multi-layered set of physical anomalies that I haven't fully reconciled yet.

When I first tried to share these findings and reach out to people here on X, navigating the social dynamics was so incredibly complicated that I literally decided it was easier to go back and re-familiarize myself with four semesters of college physics than it was to "decode" this stupid algorithm. But watching your breakdowns on @ADN1776 gave me an immense amount of insight into how these environmental factors and natural electrical behaviors actually interact.

You could very well be totally right about the large plastic case and the battery pack. Honestly, I'm still rooting for @JesseOnFire’s hypothesis to be right, because it does make a lot of sense if you just literally look at the aftermath. I mean, I have truly never seen such a distinct pattern of bizarre, unnatural, post-incident responses—I’ll call them "affective behavioral anomalies," to be generous, but my goodness. Sadly, however, my heart sank a bit after seeing that burnt piece from the SUV. And then after doing my own tests (where I almost accidentally electrocuted myself for sure once and maybe actually twice), I had to start shifting my focus. Although, I still believe Jesse is no less than 50% correct about the broader operational goal.

I think part of what makes this setup so effective is that even the people directly involved on the ground don't actually know fully what happened. They each only know their own tiny, hyper-sequestered part of the total sequence. That structural blindness is maybe why so many of them are completely hesitant to come forward. What can they say if they don't really know for sure what they partook in? They might literally not have the full picture. And if participants were expecting a different outcome, there could be legal fear of complicity.

My only lingering hesitation is that we might be giving the people orchestrating this scenario a little more logistical credit than they actually deserve. Regardless of the exact trigger deployment, we know for a fact that something went completely sideways on that stage, and we're just trying to map out where the systemic operational friction reached its critical fail-point���because it did. We all should be invested in this, because from the moment their system went past the point of no return, we were all already riding the disaster all the way down with them.

The only conclusion that would be genuinely worse than any other outcome is finding out that this wasn't an operation that accidentally went sideways, and that every single bit of this went exactly as they originally calculated to achieve this precise outcome. The real horror would be realizing that this entire spectacle—down to every single rogue footprint, every technical anomaly, and the fact that we're all sitting here calling it out right now—was exactly what they calculated to happen from the very start. That kind of total orchestration would be the ultimate insult to the intelligence of everyone participating in a genuine search for the actual truth, and it would completely shatter any lingering belief I am clinging onto that we can still exact real change by uncovering the truth.

[Alex McCue @AlexandriaMcCue]

I think I meant to send this to you, but I didn't, because X is more complicated and harder to navigate than physics is to master, lol. But it's true. The only way I will consider that it was maybe a palm pistol is if we find out that Rick Cutler's real first name is Pete. Not Peter, but just straight up Pete. Because then it would make total sense that that's what happened. Because obviously, he would have been born to become "Palm Pistol Pete." Otherwise, yeah I'm not capable of subscribing to that one.

[Alex McCue @AlexandriaMcCue]

Was Dan Flood mirroring Rick Cutler's arm movements?

If Rick was hypothetically pulling a pin to break an electrical circuit, and Dan Flood was hypothetically simultaneously mirroring Rick's actions, could this hypothetical, synchronized movement serve as a physical signal for every other operator on the perimeter to let them know exactly when the line was live, and exactly when the line was cut?

[Alex McCue @AlexandriaMcCue]

The only way I will consider that it was maybe a palm pistol is if we find out that Rick Cutler's real first name is Pete. Not Peter, but just straight up Pete. Because then it would make total sense that that's what happened. Because obviously, he would have been born to become "Palm Pistol Pete." Otherwise, yeah I'm not capable of subscribing to that one.

[Alex McCue @AlexandriaMcCue]

I'm trying to figure out the whole "are they signals or are they not signals," too. But if those 8 backpacks/messenger bags were in fact carrying satellite mesh nodes, then that would make it at least possible that there was a completely radio-silent, non-verbal communication structure in place.
And if so, it would fall right in line with the whole operation staying off-grid in regard to a power source. If that "mobile command unit" was the origin of an electrical current, then that off-site power source could bypass the standard campus electrical infrastructure completely. I dunno, though.
This is what keeps me up at night now.

[Alex McCue @AlexandriaMcCue]

I don't know which one it is either, but it would certainly help a lot to know if that was sadness or sweat. I'm pretty sure that when Terrell taps on that pedal, he's letting the current through that was already primed up to the on-campus utilidor junction that had originated from the mobile command unit off-site.

That mobile unit was cleverly concealed as a foam spray insulation truck (the one with the satellite on top of it). Those foam insulation rigs are already very well sound-proofed. And that particular unit had a generator in it, and it blended in seamlessly at that construction site just off campus. And because the electrical grid on that campus is biaxial, it just so happened to run along the same parallel lines.

If this is correct, then when Terrell taps that pedal, he completes the circuit to fully energize the SM58 microphone chassis unit. And this doesn't affect Charlie yet because he's at a floating potential, while all the guys from his security detail are grounded by their ESD footwear. So nothing at all would happen to Charlie until he brought his right hand in to close the final loop.

And I think Charlie knew that to a certain extent. I just don't think he knew that the density of the current was going to be converted from a medium non-lethal voltage (for a theater trick or a squibb) to a medium lethal voltage.

[Alex McCue @AlexandriaMcCue]

@NewJerzeyRebell @wtshesaid72 @Iamnotalive2day @OneKnightFury @Edgei8v @Kimchi464741 @baroncoleman @CharlotteLee_88 @AngelZoe1111 Yes, very shortly after.

[Alex McCue @AlexandriaMcCue]

What are your suspicions?

[Alex McCue @AlexandriaMcCue]

@AngelZoe1111 @Kimchi464741 @baroncoleman @wtshesaid72 @Iamnotalive2day @NewJerzeyRebell @ChewingTheVoid @OneKnightFury @Edgei8v I'm not overly confident at all. That's why I wanted to get other peoples' opinions, because I don't know.

[Alex McCue @AlexandriaMcCue]

I don't think Butch is an old lady. I do think it's possible, though, that Erika was also there, and that she was digitally scrubbed out of the footage and a Butch Hibbs overlay mask was applied before the footage was released to the public. This is why I think they're making a huge fuss about Butch being there, and getting a picture with Charlie before the event and making sure he was in the aftermath footage.

It's hard to cross-reference the wide angles of the perimeter because the footage has been distributed out to us very methodically, but based on Butch's established positions in the close-ups, he logically should be visible in the background of the adjacent angles at those exact timestamps, but I can't find him in the layout.

So Butch is Butch, but Butch is also a studio-rendition of Erika. Butch was doing the work of two people at UVU that day.

[Alex McCue @AlexandriaMcCue]

This is for Edge-i8v from Baron's live chat today. I am horrible with navigating social media.

[Alex McCue @AlexandriaMcCue]

Does anybody else think Burton "Butch" Hibbs looks a little more like a dainty lady with a prominent jaw line, a button nose, nice, high cheekbones, and long, blond hair in some of his photos? Maybe just a little bit more so in some of them as opposed to others from UVU that day?

Maybe it's just the lighting, but damn, he's purdy. Yes, Burton reminds me of someone. But I just can't put my finger on who.

It probably rhymes with Scarika. Scarika... Smirk. Or is it Shirk. No, no that can't be right, either. Thoughts, anyone?

[Alex McCue @AlexandriaMcCue]

@NewJerzeyRebell @Edgei8v @Iamnotalive2day @OneKnightFury @DVegaTron @ChewingTheVoid @CharlotteLee_88 Yeah, it's unsettling. Whatever "this thing" is, it seems to involve many more layers and more moving parts than any of us could have ever imagined at the beginning.

[Alex McCue @AlexandriaMcCue]

I posted this last week, but has anyone identified this guy yet? It kinda looks like Victor Marx. Whoever it is, he's not rushing to get anywhere. He checks his cell phone and looks to his left before his tandem-run with Pierce Beck right ahead of the exfil team. I got these last 3 pics from @RealCandaceO's episode, "Devil In the Keytails: Who Fell Out of Charlie Kirk's SUV?" (Timestamp: 10:30 - 10:55)

[Alex McCue @AlexandriaMcCue]

@Kimchi464741 @Edgei8v @Iamnotalive2day @NewJerzeyRebell @OneKnightFury @DVegaTron @ChewingTheVoid @CharlotteLee_88 I replied to your other comment. It's a wee bit long.

[Alex McCue @AlexandriaMcCue]

The visual anomalies carry right over into the hands when you track the footage closely and in slow motion. Look at the red box with the blue arrows. The hand geometry is a completely distorted, dark gray mass. It doesn't quite mimic human biology. They were clearly operating under an unexpected time crunch because the plan did not go as expected. The rush job shows.

To be perfectly clear, the real Butch Shady was actually on-site the entire time. There's no debating his physical presence. But he doesn't have an unrendered digital void for a face or glitched gray geometric masses for hands.

The mechanism here is clever but sloppy. They used the real Butch walking around after Charlie was taken down as a baseline narrative shield to make us assume the figure at the perimeter was also him. But physical geometry and rushed pixels don’t lie, no matter how much digital paint they throw over the timeline under pressure.

They needed Erika scrubbed from that specific perimeter narrative, but they left the digital receipts all over the footage.

[Alex McCue @AlexandriaMcCue]

Not exactly. I’m not saying she wore a physical disguise or a fake beard on-site. I'm suggesting she was there as herself. I'm saying, hypothetically, that Erika Kirk was physically present at the UVU event, along with Butch, and that a studio-rendered digital composite overlay was layered over her footage in post-production to change her appearance before it was released to the public.

In this purely hypothetical scenario, they were both on site, and in an attempt to hide her presence from the official timeline, Erika was digitally scrubbed out and masked over with a Butch Hibbs CGI layer.

This is why I think they're making a huge fuss about Butch being there, and getting a picture with Charlie before the event, and showing Butch in the aftermath footage in like 7 different videos, and talking about him being there that day on every podcast episode where they can find a way to bring it into the conversation. Hypothetically, poor Butch was doing double duty that day.

Since Butch Hibbs has a thick, full beard and…rambunctious…hair—and he's wearing sunglasses, a hat, long pants, and a long-sleeve shirt—his silhouette creates an easy baseline tracking mask for a CGI overlay. This would (again, hypothetically) literally be a digital mask that was layered over Erika's actual face and her physical movements.

But it was a rush-job that produced a poorly rendered digital layer. And so when you zoom in closely on the raw frames, the underlying biometric facial geometry and physical features remain distinctly effeminate. His beard isn't always fully there, and his sunglasses magically disappear in some frames only to reappear in the next frame. I'm just saying this could hypothetically point to an artificial layer applied over the authentic footage.

[Alex McCue @AlexandriaMcCue]

Does anybody else think Burton "Butch" Hibbs looks a little more like a dainty lady with a prominent jaw line, a button nose, nice, high cheekbones, and long, blond hair in some of his photos? Maybe just a little bit more so in some of them as opposed to others from UVU that day?

Maybe it's just the lighting, but damn, he's purdy. Yes, Burton reminds me of someone. But I just can't put my finger on who.

It probably rhymes with Scarika. Scarika... Shirk. Or Smirk. Scarika Smirk. Thoughts, anyone?

What would we call them? Berika (a modest celebrity mashup), Burtika (sounds like a painful diagnosis), or Eriburt (the next big character name to debut in a new LOTR movie)?

The suspicions of @baroncoleman regarding Butch on @JonesDanny were spot on. Because Butch Looks Like a Lady.

The attempt at manipulation is insulting. Just look at the face in the blue box. When the CGI layer was applied to morph Erika into Butch, they completely gave up on the fine details. There are literally no facial features there. No eyes, no depth—just a blank, unrendered digital void beneath the brim of a baseball hat.

[Alex McCue @AlexandriaMcCue]

@Kimchi464741 @baroncoleman @wtshesaid72 @Iamnotalive2day @NewJerzeyRebell @ChewingTheVoid @OneKnightFury @Edgei8v Thanks. Will do. None of this smells good, that's for sure...

[Alex McCue @AlexandriaMcCue]

@Kimchi464741 @wtshesaid72 @Iamnotalive2day @OneKnightFury @MuppetMasher @alleytopfiles @DDGotAPodcast @RealBayes @realjesseonfire @baroncoleman @heavydcountry Thank you for that message. I really appreciate you.

[Alex McCue @AlexandriaMcCue]

Look at this massive, dark, distorted vertical streak extending from the foreground, through the midground, and into the background. It looks like a severe rendering artifact or a crude feathering mask meant to block out a figure standing right in front of the camera lens.