Alex

[Alex @Alexgggrr]

I bought $GRUTA token because I don’t really like money, but I love watching old prostitutes defending a pig 🙂‍↔️

#GRUTAChallenge

Why did you buy the $GRUTA token?

$GRUTA CA:

35t5DPbwJtB1tpGiSnqedLwQomi94BRKVDPyTRLdbonk

[Dogtor @Dogtor_A1]

I bought the $GRUTA token because I believe there should be more prostitutes on the streets of Moscow (former professional FUDders) 😁

Why did you buy the $GRUTA token? #GRUTAChallenge

$GRUTA CA:

35t5DPbwJtB1tpGiSnqedLwQomi94BRKVDPyTRLdbonk

[Dogtor @Dogtor_A1]

What crypto is in 2026. And why this cycle had no altseason.

Crypto in 2026 is Anatoly Yakovenko ( @toly ) dodging nine attempts to serve him in the suit against @solana / @Pumpfun / @a1lon9 — three in a single day, Aug 5, 2025. The court had to authorize alternative service, by email and FedEx. He’s still a named defendant; the case isn’t dismissed.

Proof (order, ECF 99): https://t.co/qgEaRjowWD

Is this how he pictured success? I doubt it :)

Crypto in 2026 is @TheOnlyNom explaining to $BNKK shareholders why their stake keeps shrinking. The company publicly brags it became “debt-free” with a 10.59 current ratio and “10x liquidity coverage” (CFO’s words, April 7, 2026 press release). Three small details, though:

— that same annual report (10-K) carries the auditor’s substantial-doubt-going-concern warning;

— independent data (InvestingPro) shows the real current ratio at ~1.01, not 10.59 — because the “10x coverage” is calculated excluding the volatile BONK tokens, which booked a −$35.4M unrealized loss in that very report;

— and the runway for future issuance is already cleared: authorized shares were raised from 250M to 1 billion (Oct 2025), plus a $100M shelf registration was filed (April 2026).

10-K: https://t.co/AbTWndtuOf

S-3 ($100M): https://t.co/kbzQWh8I1B

And this is a @Nasdaq -listed company whose revenue is almost entirely tied to @bonkfun Two catches. One: nobody knows who’s behind @bonkfun — @SolportTom is anonymous, the entity isn’t disclosed, and when we asked (even though their own ToS says anyone can get this info) we simply got no reply. Two: shareholders think they own 51% of BF revenue. Formally — yes, 51% right now. But that same agreement hides a reversion clause:

@TheOnlyNom and @SolportTom can, by mutual consent, revert that share back to 10% at any time. You’re buying a stake two people can cut fivefold with a stroke of a pen. It’s all in the 10-K — read Note 2.

Crypto in 2026 is wall-to-wall manipulation. Especially on Solana. It’s 2026, baby.

Here’s why I’m writing this. So you understand why Anatoly is so nervously trying to shake off the casino vibe @a1lon9 built. Honestly, I get him. And I get Alon too. In his own words — internal chats the court admitted to the record (Exhibit A, ECF 78, Aguilar v. Baton, 1:25-cv-00880, SDNY) — he knew most people lose, but figured they’d be “happier” that way, and that his casino was more honest than the other shitcoin schemes. And if it’s more honest — he slept just fine :)

Proof (Exhibit A “Admits Gambling”): https://t.co/28O5LKHRPD

@SolportTom with his @bonkfun , in my view, simply copied Alon’s system — but made it less transparent. And for some reason @TheOnlyNom is part of all this.

Just something to chew on. So the bear market isn’t so boring :)

[Dogtor @Dogtor_A1]

GM!

Bitcoin 67,700

Everyone with a Plan B doesn’t stress.

Red is the new black.

[Dogtor @Dogtor_A1]

In the coming days, communities on X will disappear. Dear @nikitabier — if there’s any possibility at all to preserve the posts in communities for history, please do it. From our community alone, dozens of people poured an enormous amount of energy and time into posts there, and it would be deeply sad if those posts simply vanished as if they never existed. Leave history the ability to judge certain periods — including the period when X communities existed. Just turn this page, don’t tear it out.

As for everything else — we calmly keep working. And we’ll only tell you about it in broad strokes. It’s Web2. And that’s all we can say. Why? Because crypto is, fucking honestly, a synonym for fraud and total cluelessness — the situation is even worse than in 2021, if I’m being real. A simple example: we receive credits from large companies for AI infrastructure, and what do you think is written in capital letters in the terms of those credits? “If it’s not connected to crypto — we’re ready to help.”

Why did it turn out this way? Everyone has to ask themselves that question, especially on @solana @toly , of course, has his own answer — and on a human level, I understand every one of his decisions. Every step. To understand a person, you have to understand their whole path, from beginning to end. I understand Anatoly — or so it seems to me. There’s only one thing I’ll never understand: I’ll never forget how, at the peak of success (as it seemed to all of us back then), he destroyed — just like that, for no real reason — the project of an actual developer who had answered Anatoly’s own call to build Solana forks, mocking him on a live stream. Calling his project useless (a project the man had spent many months of work and resources on). And the most interesting part is that for that very stream, this person — with the $Los Analos token, if I’m not mistaken — had paid tens of thousands of dollars. That was the exact moment everything became clear to me about Solana, about how people outside the “in-crowd” get supported, and I had no more questions — neither for Anatoly nor for Solana. It’s interesting: now that even formerly outspoken Solana supporters are voicing doubts about its prospects — would @toly joke the same way again, and again not apologize for a destroyed project and a destroyed life?

This is Solana. That’s all I understood in a year inside this ecosystem.

There was also $Dark — @edgarpavlovsky project, which I backed from the very beginning, putting sums into it that were very large for me, and not even just tens of thousands of dollars :) The logic was simple: the person is open, the person is from the Solana in-crowd — he simply can’t deceive everyone. Well, it turned out how it turned out — I got wrecked there. I’ll note that Edgar, even though he has adventurer-like traits in his character and sometimes probably feels like he’s grabbed God by the balls — is a genuinely very promising person. A big talent. Who, for the sake of ordinary life, for many reasons, is forced to get involved in…

But that’s a separate story, known only to him. In any case, I hold no grudge against him, even though I really did lose serious money — serious for me — on his token. I see it as an investment in a person I believe in, even though I’ll never receive any dividends. But we’re all just the sword of God, we’re His conduit, and if I helped someone — even at some cost to myself — then that’s how it was meant to be. I’ll say it again: Edgar is a big talent, and it’s not a shame at all to sometimes help people like that.

And now, moving on — we created our token $Gruta in the Bonk ecosystem. Believing the promises that this was something first-of-its-kind, open, something that cared about its own reputation. @TheOnlyNom was the beacon of that movement, the one overseeing @SolportTom How Tom screwed everyone over through BF — I don’t think I even need to explain. Against his backdrop, @a1lon9 honestly looks like a damn saint.

[Dogtor @Dogtor_A1]

In February 2026, @mert and @toly spoke at one of the @solana conferences and explained what happened with many launchpads ( @bonkfun , @BagsApp , @launchcoin and others).

[Dogtor @Dogtor_A1]

Read the headline — “BlackRock buying memecoins”?

@TheOnlyNom replied “Welcome aboard.”

What picture formed in your head? Finally, the largest institutionals have come to Bonk too, right?

But this is exactly the kind of situation — fact-juggling, opacity, chasing the hype — that’s why there was no altseason last cycle. And why crypto, especially on Solana, has such a bad reputation in the normal world.

It’s simple. Mitchell Rudy ( @TheOnlyNom ), President of $BNKK since April 29, 2026, cannot have been unaware that these shares were bought by index funds back in 2021 — long before the company became $BNKK . Back then it was called Jupiter Wellness (ticker JUPW).

Inclusion happened almost automatically through passive index funds as soon as the company met the thresholds for broad-market indexes.

Proof — BlackRock’s 13F filing as of June 30, 2021: 17,728 shares of JUPITER WELLNESS INC. CUSIP 48208F105.

https://t.co/xXTQjXOt0X (Ctrl+F → Jupiter Wellness)

Then the company changed names several times — Safety Shot (ticker SHOT), then $BNKK. But the CUSIP never changed — Bonk itself confirmed this in its October 9, 2025 press release: “the common stock CUSIP remains 48208F105.”

And one more proof — the same BlackRock as of June 30, 2025: 526,599 shares of SAFETY SHOT INC. Same CUSIP 48208F105 as $BNKK has today.

https://t.co/pbhdHBr6zq (Ctrl+F → 48208F105)

So BlackRock has continuously held this security since 2021 — back when it was a hangover-drink company. They didn’t “buy a memecoin” — they’re just mechanically continuing to hold the same security under a new name.

And BlackRock, seeing how their passive position in a public company is being framed as “they bought crypto” — will of course become crypto enthusiasts))))

But on the bright side, as actual investors they can now ask a few questions.

For example — why is the only meaningful profit in $BNKK’s latest quarterly report ($796,404) the sale of 1,596,000 Caring Brands shares to four unnamed institutional investors at $0.50 per share, while the market price was $1.05 (~52% discount)? Not paid in cash — only in promissory notes maturing July 30, 2026, with no interest and no collateral. SPAs signed on March 20, 2026 — the exact same day BonkFun published its postmortem on the domain hack.

$BNKK 10-Q: https://t.co/dE7SuvXnxp (Notes 3 and 7)

Why does $BNKK depend almost entirely on revenue from BonkFun, which is run by @SolportTom — a legend of the crypto market :)

By the way, he hasn’t written “next week” and disappeared after it for a while now — I’m starting to worry about him :)

And of course BlackRock might also ask — why is the https://t.co/TfGZbdnyVb domain hack not reflected in $BNKK’s latest quarterly report, given that the overwhelming majority of revenue comes precisely from the affected launchpad?
So many questions BlackRock can now be expected to ask, @TheOnlyNom

And maybe, indeed — welcome aboard :)

@CoinDesk @Cointelegraph @DecryptMedia @BitcoinMagazine

[Dogtor @Dogtor_A1]

There’s a situation forming in Solana where old builders are being pushed aside. It’s a new format from @solana and @aeyakovenkoe — an attempt to focus only on projects that bring attention and profit here and now.
You can criticize Toly all you want, but it’s business logic. Anatoly is trying to cut loose ends — and that’s normal.

But you need to consider that the leadership of BF has done exactly the same thing to their own builders. Every single one of them, without exception, was thrown overboard. Over $10M allocated for their marketing simply evaporated — and nobody can say where it went (and @SolportTom just stays silent on these questions).

BF flushed away everyone who supported them, and even @theunipcs is now distancing himself as much as he can from Tom and BF — though he still supports #useless and (thank god) hasn’t migrated.

Nom is an old builder in this situation — but he can’t or won’t see it. It’s strange to blame Anatoly for exactly what’s happening in your own house with other builders.
By the way, $BNKK recently reported its first quarter.
https://t.co/dE7SuvXVmX

Here’s what’s in this report:

— Net loss ~$1.8M for the quarter

— The only significant profit in the P&L: ~$800K from the sale of ~1.6M shares of Caring Brands (CABR) to four unnamed “institutional investors.” At a ~50% discount to market price. With no cash payment — only 4-month promissory notes, no interest, no collateral

— Sale agreements signed on March 20, 2026 — the same day BonkFun published the postmortem about the domain hack

— The BonkFun hack is mentioned nowhere in the report: not in Subsequent Events, not in MD&A, not in Risk Factors, not in Legal Proceedings. Complete silence about an incident that affected the platform generating ~80% of $BNKK revenue

— Disclosure controls and procedures declared by management as ineffective — second quarter in a row
I think any careful observer has grounds to raise questions with the regulator. And recent precedents show these questions cost real money (Mimecast ~$1M, Avaya ~$1M, Check Point ~$1M, Unisys ~$4M — all for incomplete cybersecurity disclosures).

@TheOnlyNom , you’re a really solid builder. But tell me please — shouldn’t you first put your own house in order before criticizing @solana ? Shouldn’t you deal with @SolportTom, who’s openly sinking the entire $BONK system?

Just a question. One that I hope you have answers to — at least for yourself.

[Dogtor @Dogtor_A1]

Remember your first love?

How you looked at her for the first time — the world filled with music, the sun gave every ray just to you.

How you hugged your grandfather or grandmother, and birds were chirping all around, and the trees were so big.

How mom and dad laughed brightly at sunset by that lake — together with you. And then you all swam, and they held your hands in the deep water.

All of this — marks carved into your soul.

All of this is you. Not knowledge, not skills — but the emotional intelligence you’ve gathered through your life.

And it is exactly this that will help us defeat AI.

One day, one of the creators will press the self-destruct button.

One day, a hacker will do what so many fear.

One day, a human will act irrationally — and by doing so, save humanity.

Or at least part of it.

Emotional intelligence, humanity, and irrationality — this is our last weapon, the one that may save us at the very last moment, when it seems all is already lost.

That kiss of first love, or just a glance that left a mark for life — that is exactly what AI will never understand.

Just think about it.

✊✊✊

[Dogtor @Dogtor_A1]

Tom, we’re glad for the victims of course, but this chapter is far from closed - and I think you understand perfectly well why.

@Dynadot has not publicly confirmed your post-mortem claim that their employees were social-engineered. Meanwhile, you quietly deleted your original posts where you stated that it was a BF team account that was hijacked. Your March 12 words — “hackers have hijacked a team account” — are preserved across CoinDesk, Decrypt, The Block, and dozens of other outlets. Then on March 20 your post-mortem suddenly says “this incident was not the result of any compromise of team accounts.”

Which one is it?

$BNKK receives 51% of BF revenue. Their last SEC filing was January 28. Under SEC rules, material cybersecurity incidents must be disclosed within 4 business days. The platform was down for ~9 days. Has BNKK notified the SEC about this incident?

Victims are receiving refunds — from which legal entity exactly? Your ToS (Section 1) says to contact you by email for information about the company behind BonkFun. We did. No response — despite your own rules requiring it. People are receiving money from an unnamed company they cannot identify. Who do they turn to if the refund is incomplete?

Perhaps @BurwickLaw can correct me if my questions are off base :)

[Alex @Alexgggrr]

@Dogtor_A1 @bonkfun @SolportTom @Dynadot @toly @TheOnlyNom @solana @SolanaSensei @solportskg @iamkadense @Dynadot did you actually get hacked? :(

[Dogtor @Dogtor_A1]

The @bonkfun team and @SolportTom have blamed @Dynadot for the domain hack, claiming their employee was compromised via social engineering. At the same time, they’ve started quietly deleting their own posts where they wrote that it was a BF team member who was compromised - not Dynadot.

But thanks to @SolportTom usual level of competence, we see everything in real time as always. Deleted posts have been saved on archiving services and we parsed them in advance. You’re welcome, Tom 🫡

So here’s what Tom originally wrote on March 12 (now deleted):

“Do not use the https://t.co/TfGZbdnyVb domain until further notice, hackers have hijacked a team account forcing a drainer on the DOMAIN”

And here’s what the official post-mortem says a week later:

“This incident was not the result of any compromise of BONK or BONKfun internal systems, codebase, or team accounts”

Delete your tweets all you want, Tom - the internet remembers everything.

For @Dynadot , being publicly blamed for a security breach is enormous reputational damage. The kind of thing a company would address publicly. We have sent an official inquiry to @Dynadot asking them to confirm or deny BonkFun’s claims.

We are waiting for a response.

So which is it, Tom? Was it your team account that was hijacked - as you said yourself? Or is it all @Dynadot fault - as your post-mortem now claims?

One of these statements is a lie. And deleting the first one doesn’t make it disappear.

[Dogtor @Dogtor_A1]

Gm!

So, yesterday we sent a letter to the official contact listed in the Terms of Service - [email protected] - requesting disclosure of the legal entity behind @bonkfun According to their own rules, this is exactly how you can find out which company manages the platform.

But…

Today, a notification came that the letter has failed to deliver for over 12 hours. The system will try for another 2 days, after which we can conclude that the contact email of the platform with multimillion-dollar turnover, managed by @SolportTom , simply doesn't work)))

Either their server is turned off, or the email is just not set up and never was. And possibly this email exists only as a formality in the ToS.

Want to find out what legal entity is behind BonkFun? Request the information. But the email doesn't work 😁

Waiting 2 days 👀

P.S. Tom, where are the millions of dollars that were supposed to be allocated for marketing the BF eco communities? Tom? Why are you silent? If they were spent as intended, you could just publicly report on this issue, right?

@toly @solana @TheOnlyNom @zachxbt

[Alex @Alexgggrr]

@Dogtor_A1 @TheOnlyNom @solportskg @iamkadense @solana @toly … @grok is it true?

[Dogtor @Dogtor_A1]

Gm, Gruta Fam!

We don’t want to migrate like other tokens from the BF eco. We don’t want to run away from problems. We truly believe in $Bonk , so we’re doing everything in our power to change the situation.

The situation, to put it mildly, is not great. We already wrote that, in our opinion, a share of the market was lost due to the incompetence of the BF leadership and specifically @SolportTom

Now, after carefully studying how @bonkfun is structured, I have to conclude that besides incompetence, there is also a quite deliberate plan (I may be wrong, but I personally have no other explanation) by the current BF leadership to create an absolutely opaque and suspicious system. This not only undermines trust but can also lead to very serious legal consequences.

Judge for yourselves how the system is built and what the risks are:

1. BonkFun operator is hidden despite a public partner

51% of BonkFun revenue goes to Bonk, Inc. (BNKK) — a public Nasdaq-listed company accountable to the SEC. This is real transparency, and the dashboard at https://t.co/SbSmkl6RrV shows on-chain distribution that anyone can verify.

But Bonk, Inc. is only the revenue recipient, not the platform operator. The operator remains an unknown BVI entity. In the Terms of Service (https://t.co/YA5bDTHiw1), Section 1 literally says: “For specific information about the legal entity behind https://t.co/3SWBS8BvtD, please contact us at the email listed in Section 14.” The legal entity is not named in the ToS or Privacy Policy — everywhere it’s just “https://t.co/3SWBS8BvtD”. Jurisdiction: British Virgin Islands.

For comparison: https://t.co/mF3y0xqC2B is also BVI, but their ToS directly names Baton Corporation Ltd. (UK, Company No. 14743013), three publicly known founders, a specific arbitration mechanism (BVI Arbitration Act 2013, Tortola), and a concrete list of prohibited jurisdictions. And even with all that, https://t.co/mF3y0xqC2B received two class-action lawsuits and an FCA warning.

BonkFun chose not to disclose even what https://t.co/mF3y0xqC2B disclosed — despite tens of millions of dollars having passed through the platform from September 2025 to March 2026.

In essence, no one knows what legal entity actually stands behind BF.

2. Anonymous operator controls ~23% of revenue

51% goes to the public Bonk, Inc. — transparency exists here. But the remaining ~23% (per the dashboard: $GP Reserve 7.67%, Hiring/Growth 7.67%, Development/Integration 7.67%) goes to Graphite Proto — Tom’s company. Tom’s real name is unknown. Graphite Proto has no public registration — no jurisdiction, no company number, no address.

So nearly a quarter of many tens of millions of dollars flows through a completely opaque entity controlled by an anonymous person. For the Bonk, Inc. portion, SEC reporting works. For the Graphite portion — zero accountability.

3. Conflict of interest via $GP

BonkFun revenue → 7.67% directly to $GP Reserve (straight from the dashboard). Tom owns $GP. He makes strategic platform decisions that most likely directly enrich his own token. He himself stated $300-700k per week in buybacks, a $1m LP pool for $GP, and hiring a COO specifically for $GP.

At the same time, the official @bonkfun account has never once mentioned the $GP token. Zero conflict-of-interest disclosure. The fact that 51% goes to a public company does not remove the question of how the remaining 23% is used.

4. Public financial promises without reporting

The https://t.co/SbSmkl6RrV dashboard shows overall distribution — and that’s good. But it does not confirm Tom’s specific promises to the communities:

[GRUTA @GrutaPig]

@NICKIMINAJ 🙏🏽🇺🇸🐽

[GRUTA @GrutaPig]

@Ga__ke or a passing car violating the rules? 😁

[Dogtor @Dogtor_A1]

@toly ... @toly , you did an excellent job playing that role 🫡 I always knew you had acting talent

[GRUTA @GrutaPig]

@theunipcs but don't quit, yet 🤝

[GRUTA @GrutaPig]

@mert … верю в тебя в дорогую подругу мою 🫡

[GRUTA @GrutaPig]

@RoundtableSpace Why? 🐽

[GRUTA @GrutaPig]

@elonmusk They really do 🐽