Choose an establishment leader palatable enough to the electorate.
Evade structural change necessary to maintain and grow public support.
MPs get febrile and stick their knives out, drunk on the benefits of the unrepresentative, kompromat-driven system.
Repeat.
The GCC is consolidating its position as the regional hegemon, led by the KSA. Militancy served a purpose when blocs were fragmented prior to all this regional convergence.
But with GCC alignment with BRICS + TPS and Iran, militancy has become a liability, blocking trade normalization, energy investment, and bloc insulation.
The Houthis just experienced a leadership decapitation strike. I said this would happen a year ago.
And it happened without regional destabilization. Which means this is a clear sign of liability trimming.
Hamas is being pressured to integrate into a “post-Gaza war” governance framework.
PMF (Iraq) are drafting laws to fold militias into state institutions.
Syria is making amends to integrate the SDF and other military factions.
Israel has intensified precision strikes on Hezbollah’s infrastructure in Lebanon, specifically targeting command hubs and leadership figures.
Hezbollah, once a useful proxy, increasingly represents a growing liability, just like all the other proxies,
to Israel’s normalization efforts with GCC bloc partners.
Axis hardliners can hate this analysis or take it personally, but the facts dont change.
Israel is shifting from broad conflict to focused liability elimination. Not a liability for itself. But a liability for the GCC, BRICS and now, the TPS.
The Axis was always a growth asset for Israel. That's gone now.
This requalification sets the stage for scenario shifts where everything is transitioning from war optics to post-conflict investment and potential normalization.
Whether the proxies are being eliminated, pretending to be eliminated, is not relevant. What is relevant is that casualties among leadership figures serve as a signpost that major disruptive actors are being pruned.
This approach readies the region and external audiences for the next stage,
where stability is touted in place of resistance.
The TPS wants maritime chokepoints, reconstruction contracts, and stable supply chains. They have invested and co-invested (with the GCC) to substantiate these agendas.
These proxies and militias are obstacles to that ROI.
GCC wants legitimacy, bloc leadership, and insulation from sanctions/pressure.
These proxies and militias undermine their narrative of being the region’s stabilizers.
This is not peace for its own sake. It’s orchestrated theater plus selective extermination to clear liabilities. Militancy is being converted into governable structures through integration, or liquidated entirely via decapitation strikes and funding cuts.
When blocs like the GCC and BRICS converge, and TPS profit pipelines are at stake,
obviously militancy shifts from asset to liability.
This will continue in the region. Whether you like it or not.
Staged conflicts and precision eliminations will continue until proxies are either absorbed or abandoned.
If you have been paying close attention, you would know that Iran's proxies have largely re-aligned to take orders from the GCC.
Their red sea attacks in 2023–24 lined up with moments when the GCC wanted to put pressure on Israel (and indirectly the US) without directly confronting them.
The strikes created calibrated instability that gave the GCC bargaining leverage (energy premiums, international mediation attention, showing they could “rein in” militants).
The houthis functioned as a bargaining chip proxy, tolerated as long as they served the GCC’s dual-track diplomacy with BRICS/TPS.
But once those functions were exhausted and the GCC secured normalization leverage (Saudi–Iran deal, BRICS integration, bloc insulation), security credibility (presenting themselves as stabilizers to the TPS/FIC),
…the Houthis flip category:
from asset to liability.
And I have said this many times before.
Proxies are NEVER permanent assets.
They oscillate between functional leverage and liabilities.
You can summarize the houthi journey as
Phase 1 (2023–24): GCC tacit tolerance and hedging, where the houthis were acting as a pressure valve against Israel.
And Phase 2 (2025 onward): GCC convergence with BRICS/TPS ultimately means that the houthis must be trimmed, integrated, or phased out.
Now.
Netanyahu isn’t just a politician. He’s an operator of a colony project. His goal has been not to save the Israeli state, but to transition himself into TPS immunity.
Protection through legal, financial, or institutional insulation.
That means his personal survival and TPS cover are decoupled from Israel’s survival as a hegemonic entity.
The Israeli cabinet, especially the far-right hardliners, are liabilities in this decoupling and normalization process.
They block GCC integration, escalate genocidal optics, and create legitimacy costs for the blocs.
As Israel shifts from “colony to vassal,” these figures must be divested.
The TPS logic here is to slowly sacrifice the most radical actors (hardline ministers, settler ideologues) to create the illusion of moderation and smooth Israel’s downgrade into GCC dependency.
Signs already point to Netanyahu's dismantlement of the cabinet.
Delegitimization: Israeli elites (judiciary, media) amplifying corruption trials and scandals around cabinet hardliners.
Selective targeting: TPS-aligned outlets framing Smotrich/Ben-Gvir as destabilizers rather than “defenders.”
Foreign pressure choreography: US/EU criticism suddenly narrowing on the far-right while still shielding Netanyahu himself.
This is classic theater staging.
Netanyahu survives as the “moderate statesman” while his cabinet is burned as the liability.
What will come next is the repackaging of Israel’s political system. It will be rebranded under a technocratic or centrist veneer to present to GCC/BRICS as a manageable partner.
Now you have to understand that the media will frame the purge as “Israeli democracy correcting itself” when in reality it’s TPS pruning liabilities to ensure bloc integration.
But.
Before any of this can be done. Proxies must first be "eliminated".
Why?
This concept should honestly come naturally to people.
GCC/BRICS and the TPS want militancy removed to make normalization palatable. Proxies are “messy liabilities” that disrupt trade flows, scare investors, and complicate the optics of convergence.
Proxies are cheaper to dismantle than governments. They don’t require full regime collapse, just selective funding cuts, integration into state militaries, or liquidation of leadership.
So proxy liquidation comes first because it creates visible wins at low systemic cost.
You CANNOT strip the ruling cabinet first. Because that will look like external regime change, which delegitimizes the whole transition.
Once proxies are out of the way, the “big prize” (the government) can be phased down without risk of proxy escalation undermining the process.
Ok so
Stage 1: “The war on terror has been weakened”
Stage 2: “Israel must reform itself for peace and stability. Lets activate global hate and isolate.”
Stage 3: “The extremists are now gone; Israel reformed, lets go back to the table.”
This sequencing makes it look to western publics like a linear arc toward peace, when in reality it’s a TPS liability divestment cycle.
Removing irregular militias first is the ONLY way to claim that the region is “normalizing.”
Then you need to factor in the narrative spin that the West loves to apply.
Western audiences, hawkish political factions, need “closure”. Proxy destruction gives them their "victory moment" and no excuse to revitalize warfare.
After that, phasing out the Israeli cabinet looks like Israel moderating itself, not like external vassalization.
The TPS wins twice. And it has to.
First by neutralizing messy militias, second by selling Israel’s downgrade as self-correction rather than imposed dependency.
The GCC and BRICS are aligned with both outcomes. And they do not care about narrative as long as the outcomes don't change.
And I have said this many times before as well. The GCC, BRICS and the TPS are all on the same side.
Furthermore.
When I say proxies will be eliminated, most people think its sword to the neck.
This is not true.
Killing or “neutralizing” a proxy leader has enormous media and diplomatic weight but rarely destroys the proxy network itself. Militias are decentralized and regenerate quickly.
Many times, so-called eliminated leaders are simply relocated, rebranded, or quietly integrated into state structures. The public narrative is “elimination,” but the reality is managed recycling.
In conflicts like Gaza, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, or Yemen, leadership “hits” are often coordinated with rival patrons, signaling that the person was sacrificed as part of a liability divestment bargain.
We've already seen this with in the 12-day war, the US strikes on Yemen earlier this year, and the regeneration of Hamas after supposedly losing mass numbers.
And the narrative PLAYS on that.
Israel/US claimed to have “crippled” IRGC operations.
But on the ground, Iran’s command and supply networks weren’t truly broken.
They simply pulled back and recalibrated.
So,
the APPEARANCE of IRGC degradation gave cover for:
- GCC to argue “see, Iran is contained.”
- TPS media to spin “victory optics” for Israel/US.
- Iran itself to use “managed retreat” as proof of pragmatism in normalization.
The reality however is that the IRGC did not incur the damage the way the optics suggest it did. But its the SAME optics that has allowed all sides to move toward bloc convergence without losing face.
Optics matter more than bodies.
Lastly.
What everyone is seeing is apparent proxy elimination and Israel's continuous expansion.
That is not what's happening.
Israel can seize villages, corridors, or strips of land, but this does not change its structural trajectory.
The real assets (ports, LNG flows, trade corridors) sit under GCC, BRICS, and TPS-aligned financing. Israel’s territorial reach doesn’t rewrite those asset books.
Once Israel is folded under GCC normalization and framed as a hybrid actor, its footprint retracts.
You have to understand the TPS & bloc priorities.
The TPS doesn’t want Israel holding expensive liabilities like endless counterinsurgency in Lebanon.
The GCC doesn’t want an overextended Israel destabilizing its economic hub strategy.
The "extra areas" Israel is taking are bargaining chips: leverage for negotiating its own survival, not permanent gains.
And how do we know the TPS will hold up their end of the bargain once the proxies are "phased out"?
For anyone who keeps saying this, needs to understand that if Palestinians cease to exist, then there are no concessions to be made on behalf of the GCC.
There’s nothing to concede on, if Gaza is lost.
Which also means, all the deals the TPS has been chasing, will be null and void.
The FIC will never seek Palestinian extinction at the cost of sabotaging deals.
There’s no scenario where that happens.
But that doesn’t mean they won’t push to the absolute limit.
The issues with our Republic are rooted in three factors:
Lack of control of natural resources,
State machinery designed to extract and marginalise, and,
Money and power are the determinants of influence, not intellect/skill.
Weed it out, and we'll have a sovereign nation.
This is what I expect from the next president of the Republic of Kenya.
Restore our nation's Sovereignty.
Revoke post colonial treaties.
Shutdown foreign military bases in Kenya.
Terminate British American Corporation.
Nationalise minerals.
Use gold to back the shilling.
Prosecute corruption as far back as 02. 06. 1963.
Recoup stolen funds, land and all interests accrued.
Execute the corrupt in public.
Rapid industrialization.
Start-up support funds for innovation and invention.
Deregulate the economy.
Subsidize local manufacturing.
Food Security.
Organic Agriculture.
Criminalise GMO farming.
Subsidize organic farming.
Collect and supply organic seedlings to all farmers.
Ban pesticides.
Make irrigation water available.
Universal healthcare.
Investigate vaccines harm.
Free education from kindergarten to university/ college/ tertiary institutions.
Zero income tax.
Been following the Togo protests, and while the momentum is admirable, it’s clear they still have a long way to go.
What’s missing is the painful but necessary phase that Kenya went through...civic education.
That stage where citizens start to unlearn everything they’ve been conditioned to believe about tribe, loyalty, politics, religion, and the media. It’s the part where a population slowly realises that the system isn’t broken, it was designed this way, and the real enemy isn’t just a person in power, but an entire architecture of control.
This phase can’t be skipped. Every country that genuinely breaks free goes through it and it is called the uncomfortable awakening where resistance stops being emotional and becomes intentional.
You can’t protest your way into freedom without first understanding who’s really holding the chains.
Once the civic education stage is truly passed, the wheels don’t stop spinning. People begin to see through propaganda, tribal bait, and empty promises, and from that point, no regime can fully control the narrative again. The public becomes its own engine... questioning, resisting, organising and even when protests are silenced, the awareness keeps growing underground.
@carltonkitheka1 Population growth is only an issue if there's no long/medium-term economic policy that makes the best use of those economically active citizens. If you have a vested interest in ensuring this extractive system remains as is, then say that. Don't parrot tropes.
Bureaucratic/systemic preference for hierarchical over systems thinkers. Their achievements are identical to the uninformed, adding a veneer of respectability to the extractive system.
Could be wider systemic inertia, too. Systems thinkers may be drowned out or suppressed.
Why is Rigathi Gachagua working so hard to hijack a youth-led movement that clearly wants nothing to do with him? After every protest, he rushes to the media like clockwork, trying to insert himself into the conversation and use the courage of the youth to fuel his tired political ambitions. But let us not be fooled. Rigathi is a massive liability to this movement and for young Kenyans who are fighting for a total system reset, his presence is not only unnecessary, it is dangerous. This is the same man who, just weeks ago, was calling for the butchering of protesters. Now he wants to walk in our footsteps, claim our struggle, and enjoy the spotlight we earned with pain, not power. We have come too far to let opportunists rewrite the story.
We must be clear. All of us are not angels but everyone must come with clean hands. That is the bare minimum. The movement cannot be tainted by people trying to benefit from seeds they never planted. And it is not just Rigathi. What many people do not see is that commercial activists, shady businessmen, and washed-up politicians are now hovering around the movement hoping to use it for rebranding or revenge, not for real change. These groups, professional activists and the political class, cannot survive in a functional system. That is why they are scrambling to stay relevant. It has taken nearly a year to reduce the grip of commercial activism and now we must turn our attention to the politicians and tender barons who are quietly sneaking in through the back door.
Take Jimi Wanjigi for example. His sudden appearance around Saba Saba organizing circles has already caused serious damage. Some youth had begun mobilizing organically but his involvement has injected suspicion and allowed the government to spin the narrative, claiming it is him funding the movement even though we all know this uprising has been raw and people-driven from the start. But here is the issue. Wanjigi has never come clean about his past. From Anglo Leasing to the state capture era under Kibaki, his record is not spotless. So why is he trying to join this now. Is it because he believes in it or is it simply because he has been locked out of tenders in the current regime. And let us be brutally honest. If he were handed a juicy contract tomorrow, would he still speak. Or would he vanish quietly into silence the way they always do when they get what they want.
Again, we are not claiming sainthood. No one here is perfect. But the price of joining this movement is clean hands. If you are coming in for clout, revenge, or business, stay out. This is not your playground. It is the people’s last shot at resetting the nation. And we are not letting it slip away.
What Kenya needs right now is not another round of elections, recycled faces, or sugar-coated promises. We need a transitional council made up of individuals who are not obsessed with 2027, who are not entangled in scandals, and who do not owe political debts to cartels and dynasties. We need a council focused on rewriting the rules, dismantling the rotten foundation, and building a new Kenya that serves the people, not the elite. Anything less than that is just a reset button for the same problem in a new suit.
And if you want to know where the real fear lives, just mention the words transition council in public. Finya hapo tu. You will see something strange happen. Suddenly, all the so-called enemies, Ruto, Rigathi, Raila, Kalonzo, all of them, will come together, not to fight corruption, not to defend the youth, but to condemn that one idea in unison. That is the secret code. That is how you know you have touched the real nerve. Because unlike elections where they pretend to fight, a transition council threatens all of them equally. It threatens the system itself. And the system does not care who wears the crown, as long as the castle remains untouched.
Let’s be clear about Riggy G. If Gen Z is serious about building a new Kenya, then he has no place anywhere near it. He’s a massive liability to the movement. If he ever becomes Deputy President again, he wouldn't hesitate to call for the butchering of Gen Zs—don’t get it twisted.
These boomers love lecturing young people about hard work, yet Rigathi made his fortune not through innovation or creativity, but through shady tenderpreneurship. He didn’t build anything. He gamed the system.
Rigathi is a bitter fraud still smarting from impeachment. Nothing more.
Him and Kasongo are the same.
Really says a lot when agreeing with certain sentiments said by certain people is akin to being enslaved by their principles. Do people actually do that? Prostituting your opinions for some sort of validation?
@Alhaji971@FGaitho237@bevalynekwambo3@husskhalid That's exactly what I think of you too. You have a long way to go,your mind is actually enslaved by @FGaitho237 principles of life. Stand out for yourself and call out injustice,be a solution to your society.Don't sell fear and hope when there is no hope because @FGaitho237 said
@cosmaslegacy@FGaitho237@bevalynekwambo3@husskhalid Calling out injustice is a way of life over here. I also happen to abhor commercial activists, those interested in profiting off of suffering in our society. The fact that you think I'm tethered to the opinions of one man shows how far we have to go in this space and our minds.
@cosmaslegacy@FGaitho237@bevalynekwambo3@husskhalid Great, fight for yourself and your rights. There's no need to rely on or value anything that commercial activists do because it's an act. Gaitho isn't doing this for clout. He's doing it so you can recognise the strength you have and not live vicariously through grifters.
@cosmaslegacy@FGaitho237@bevalynekwambo3@husskhalid The moles are those who tell you to go home where you'll be slaughtered by organised crime enforcers masquerading as police officers. Those who tell you to show up to protests with no protection in order to make content about your injury or death. Learn about discernment!
@NBonakenya @FGaitho237 If those money-obsessed hustlers actually used their platform for positive outcomes, liberation would already be here. You can't expect that from people paid to pacify you and side with oppressive arms of state machinery.
@bungomaduke@C_NyaKundiH If you've never been paid to spew the shit you do, then please start reading about the systems created and upheld to ensure our country remains the way it does.
@bungomaduke@C_NyaKundiH Never listen to a person who's willing to sell their opinion to a megalomaniac! Your time is coming Samuel, pray that you're on the flight with your masters. Otherwise, the noose will be the best-case scenario.
@FGaitho237 We can not win this war using strategies created and co-opted by state forces. Dissemination of revolutionary media (leaflets), cyber attacks, and crude weapons need to be utilised ASAP.