@paulg China doesn’t have operatives and soldier that go around the world killing people that oppose their agenda or even pay for political campaigns. That’s western countries playbook.
Il faut nécessairement réformer le ministère en charge des Finances 🇸🇳 pour pacifier le milieu de la Fonction publique, rétablir le citoyen dans ses droits et promouvoir l’équité
📍 Comment un médecin militaire, colonel de l’armée 🇸🇳, peut-il servir l’État et la communauté pendant près de 30 ans et se retrouver sans maison, simplement parce qu’il s’est contenté de son salaire ?
📍 Alors qu’un inspecteur des impôts et domaines ou un douanier, qui a difficilement obtenu le baccalauréat (ou moins), peut construire un R+3 dans l’un des quartiers les plus prisés de Dakar
📍 Le narratif derrière le décret de 1979 instituant la répartition du produit des confiscations et amendes, ainsi que la mise en place des « caisses communes », ne tient pas la route. Qu’en est-il d’un enseignant qui forme, d’un médecin qui passe des heures tardives dans les salles d’opération et qui subit l’émotion de perdre un malade ? Il faut revoir les caisses communes au même titre que les fonds spéciaux, sinon un sentiment de frustration, voire de nostalgie, pourrait s’installer
Article très intéressant sur les effets possible de l’IA sur l’économie. Aussi cela me rappelé la loi qui au Sénégal interdit les automates dans les centres d’appels. Je serais curieux de savoir si il ya une étude sur l’impact de cette loi. #tl221#galsenAI
Two economists mathematically proved that AI will destroy the economy.
Researchers from Wharton and Boston University published a terryfiying paper called "The AI Layoff Trap."
They mapped out the economic end-game of the AI transition, and it exposes a fatal flaw in competitive capitalism.
When a company replaces a worker with AI, it captures 100% of the wage savings.
But that displaced worker is also a consumer. When they lose their job, they stop buying things.
The company gets all the savings, but the loss of consumer demand is spread across the entire economy.
If there are 20 competitors in a market, a CEO only absorbs 1/20th of the economic damage their layoffs just created.
So every single rational CEO has a mathematical incentive to automate as fast as possible.
They can literally see the cliff approaching, and they still step on the gas.
It triggers an unavoidable Prisoner’s Dilemma. If you don't automate, your competitors will, and they will crush you on price.
It doesn't just hurt workers. It destroys the businesses, too.
The economy gets trapped in an automation arms race. Companies fire their workforce to stay competitive, until the entire consumer base is completely hollowed out.
At the limit, the paper concludes: “Firms automate their way to boundless productivity and zero demand.”
And the scariest part?
The researchers mathematically tested every popular fix.
Universal Basic Income? Fails. It raises the living standard but doesn't change the corporate incentive to cut jobs. Retraining? Fails. Worker equity? Fails.
The paper proves that more competition actually makes the collapse happen faster. And "better" AI makes the damage worse.
The only thing that mathematically stops the collapse is a targeted automation tax, forcing companies to pay for the purchasing power they destroy before they automate the job.
@Noo_IDcard Qui peut mettre ici la nouvelle déclaration 10 ans tard avec tout son activisme politique ?
C’est facile de déclarer à l’époque et de ne plus déclarer maintenant
@lovyPrimzy1@fitnaijaprince Why not? He could find another couple for the same date or even throw a paying event for the same date.
Asking the venue to find another couple is extra work, he should do it.
The question is more is the 12000 usd a big amount compared to to the final cost?
@GalsenNdiaye22 Pâques, Pentecôte, ascension, assomption, Toussaint, Noël =6
Korite, tabaski, magal, tamxarit, maouloud = 5
Indépendance, fête du travail =2
Sachant que tous chrétiens et musulmans se reposent ces mêmes jours