A new Iran–US deal won’t be a repeat of 2015.
Back then Iran was rebounding; today it carries a decade of inflation, underinvestment, and sanctions damage.
A deal could ease FX pressure and inflation expectations, but it won’t rewind structural decay.
Reports claim Trump urged Israel to use Syria to pressure Hezbollah.
If true, the logic is to weaken a key Iranian ally while avoiding a direct confrontation that could jeopardize diplomacy with Tehran.
On paper, it sounds neat. In the ME, things rarely stay that simple.
Gold is up but it’s not a trend. Why?
A few months ago: “higher for longer” → yields up → gold under pressure.
Now: oil risk didn’t disappear, it just moved off headline → inflation fears → gold bids return.
No rate cuts or real supply shock, no real trend.
Israel’s continued pressure on Lebanon may be creating an opening for Tehran. If Iran plays its hand with Washington carefully and pragmatically, it could create a relative divergence between US and Israeli interests in the region.
Gold funds in Tehran’s stock market, which had been falling amid a weakening rial, reversed course immediately after Israel’s strike on Beirut’s southern suburbs.
Iran could strike Israel in response to the recent Beirut southern suburb attacks, which came after Hezbollah’s actions against Israel, even while signing a deal with the US.
If that happens, Lebanon is effectively outside the agreement before it even exists.
Iran’s stock market is pricing in diplomacy-driven gains, but Israel’s strikes on Beirut’s southern suburbs could test Tehran’s red lines and quickly widen the gap between expected and actual deal-making if tensions escalate.
Iran’s auto industry has a curious business model: Build the car. Someone else captures much of the profit. A roughly 550 trillion toman gap between factory and market prices last year suggests that access to regulated pricing can be more lucrative than production itself.