@BWeckhuysen@angew_chem@UniUtrecht I consider this recommended reading for students in our institute #UUDebye. Note that the main article is brief but there is extensive methods information online.
Congratulations @sanli and colleagues on a grant to strengthen collaboration within the Utrecht/Eindhoven/Wageningen Alliance.
https://t.co/SVizaxxMin #UUDebye
@SeattleIndpdnt @baothai1995@JoeBiden As listed on its website, a large number of the journal's editors are USA scientists. An editorial like this represents consensus of the editors. The publisher has no say in editorial decisions.
@ProfArmani@nature Although it is an editorial, not a peer-reviewed publication, it reflects consensus of Nature's editorial board, which is composed of well-respected scientists across disciplines, and I am afraid they are right.
@Duxon The AAPS is a small ultra-conservative organisation and it's not famous for its balanced views or its love of evidence based medicine.
https://t.co/vPcvjusgXF
Mark your calendars — the Photonics Online Meetup June Meeting (#POM20Ju) featuring AI, Biophotonics, and Light-matter interactions will be broadcasting directly into your home with an eastern-hemisphere-friendly time zone on June 25.
RT to share the news. More to come!!
My metacomplot theory: Big international companies with questionable motives and government support have purposely built structures that fill our digital “drinking water” with complot theories.
It’s well known that cats dislike quantum theory because it is full of bad ideas. And if you insist, use the Heisenberg formalism and do not speak the name of you-know-who.
📢 Last call for Abstracts for @PRISMAciencia Conference!
LGTBIQA+ people and allies who work in the science, innovation and technology field, who wish to present their research in an accessible and enjoyable way.
🗓️ Apply before 30th July!
👉 https://t.co/Po2zmzQKxz
https://t.co/9SRsUXkG1S in fact fossil energy is still much more heavily subsidized than wind ever was, as the fossil emitters pay only a fraction, if anything at all, of the hundreds $ per ton it will cost to undo their emissions.
In fact the same editor more clearly recognizes it as such in a different version of the article (it escapes me why two versions ) https://t.co/AYQE8PCIBy