I was dating a nice, in-charge guy but one day he told me how I should FEEL about an opinion I held. So...
"Look, I know you're all alpha and dominant, and that's fine - you're a guy. But I'm kind of like...Alpha Barbie."
And then we broke up.
And Alpha Barbie was born.
You just pardoned an illegal who repeatedly sexually assaulted a TEN YEAR OLD. Not to mention you benefited from billions of taxpayers dollars being spent fraudulently in your state.
You are the most morally
bankrupt, corrupt American politician possibly ever. Sit this one out.
🚨 ESCÁNDALO: ayer se publicó el informe de 200 folios "The Rape Gang Inquiry Report" (investigación sobre Bandas de Violación pakistaníes en Reino Unido). Las instituciones lo ocultaron todo, incluido Keir Starmer, el PM. Es horroroso. Te lo resumo.
Estima en 250.000 niñas británicas abusadas en 149 distritos del Reino Unido durante años. No son casos aislados: son redes organizadas, mayoritariamente de hombres de origen paquistaní (entre el 87% y 95% según condenas y datos).
Recoge testimonios extremadamente gráficos y perturbadores. Ejemplos: una víctima violada por 600-700 hombres en 3 años. Niñas encerradas en jaulas como perros, quemadas con cigarrillos, waterboarding, estrangulamiento, violaciones con objetos. Fallos médicos y policiales que agravaron el trauma. Racismo étnico-religioso de los abusadores.
Y lo peor no es solo el abuso... es que las instituciones lo sabían y miraron para otro lado. Policía, servicios sociales, ayuntamientos, NHS y escuelas recibían denuncias y las ignoraban, destruían pruebas o incluso arrestaban a las víctimas por "consentir".
El miedo a ser tachados de "racistas" era más fuerte que proteger a las niñas.
Aquí es donde la historia desemboca directamente en Keir Starmer. Entre 2008 y 2013, él era el Director de Fiscalías (DPP) y jefe de la Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), la agencia que decide qué casos se persiguen.
Durante su mandato se emitieron más de 13.000 Child Abduction Warning Notices (avisos blandos sin consecuencias reales) a sospechosos de estas bandas.
En lugar de procesos penales fuertes, se optó por palmaditas en la espalda. Casos clave como Rochdale empezaron con decisiones de la CPS de no perseguir, priorizando supuestamente "evitar tensiones comunitarias" sobre la justicia.
El informe lo señala claramente (junto a otros como Sadiq Khan o Andy Burnham): el Partido Laborista, en ayuntamientos y a nivel nacional, priorizó votos en las comunidades étnicas afectadas y evitó confrontar el patrón para no parecer racista o xenófobo.
Starmer ha dicho que impulsó algunas persecuciones después, pero los hechos muestran un sistema que falló sistemáticamente bajo su liderazgo. Hoy, como primer ministro, prometió una investigación nacional... pero muchos ven que llega tarde, después de años de presión y con un enfoque que algunos critican por diluir la responsabilidad.
Keir Starmer has officially RESIGNED as British Prime Minister. Here’s a quick breakdown of what he accomplished over the past two years:
- Allowed an Islamic third-world invasion of the UK and the destruction of Western civilization
- Increased government censorship
- Made it illegal to criticize the government online
- Restricted religious freedoms for Christians
- Ostracized white people as racists and bigots
- Contributed to a large scale government cover up of Pakistani rape gangs
And the list goes on and on and on…
He’s leaving his party just as he found it: politically, financially, and morally bankrupt.
Goodbye, Keir. Don’t let the door hit you on the way out.
Never forget!
Keir Starmer Told the Muslim Mayor of London That Muslims Are the Main Victims of October 7 – Because the World Finally Saw the Satanic Nature of Islam
https://t.co/nMpFBHjGT4
After over 1,200 Jews were brutally murdered and hundreds more kidnapped, tortured, and raped by Hamas terrorists on October 7, Keir Starmer sat down with the Muslim Mayor of London and told him that Muslims are the real victims.
Why?
Because the widespread attention given to Ariel and Kfir Bibas, along with the other innocent victims of the October 7 massacre, exposed the true face of Islam to the world.
Starmer realized that the massive, open celebration and justification of rape, murder, and kidnapping of Jews by Muslims across Britain and the world had severely damaged the Muslim “victim status”, the same status they constantly exploit to avoid integration, assimilation, and to continue hating the rest of humanity in the name of Islam.
Instead of standing with the Jewish victims and condemning the barbaric attack, Starmer chose to comfort the Muslim community and downplay the horror that revealed the true nature of radical Islam.
This is the same Prime Minister who recognized Hamas as a legitimate “state,” refused to ban Iran’s Revolutionary Guards, and turned a blind eye to the grooming gangs destroying British girls.
Keir Starmer is not just weak.
He is cynical, malicious, and actively working against the interests of Britain and the Jewish people.
His legacy will forever be remembered as the man who chose political survival and Muslim votes over truth, decency, and the safety of his own citizens.
Cannot make this up, either.
@nytimes opinion has had four recent pieces about fatherhood and masculinity, with six authors:
Three women
A trans "man"
Two childless men
Not one father. The cultural elite contempt for dads runs so deep we don't even get to speak for ourselves.
"Charlie Kirk was killed because he was turning on Israel."
Charlie Kirk 5 days before he died: "They have no idea what Israel is up against. Which is these Islamic barabarian monsters. The more they understand Islam the better Israel looks."
Things that triggered the left this week:
- a clean reflecting pool
- a name on a building
- a murderer getting convicted of murder
- a sporting event at the White House
- a successful IPO
- welders and janitors becoming millionaires
Taking on @JodiKantor, architect of MeToo, who now finds herself splitting hairs around the accusations against Graham Platner.
From the new episode of The Fifth Column.
1/2 🧵
The only thing more dangerous than a radical ideology is a political class too cowardly to name it. Rubio named it. Now watch them try to destroy him for it.
🚨 Rubio Said the Quiet Part Out Loud — And the World Just Had a Seizure
They want you to apologize for noticing.
Marco Rubio — Secretary of State, standing at the podium of American power — spoke a sequence of words so plainly true that the entire global opinion-manufacturing complex immediately went into anaphylactic shock.
Here's what he actually said:
Radical Islam doesn't want a small caliphate in Iraq or Syria. They see the United States as the greatest evil on Earth. They seek to dominate the entire West. It's revolutionary. It wants endless expansion, terrorism, assassinations, and total control.
And then — this is the part that broke them — he connected the dots to American soil.
Orlando. Pensacola. The domestic attacks that the legacy press memory-holed within 72 hours because the perpetrators' ideological motives were inconvenient to the narrative.
The reaction from certain quarters was instantaneous and predictable: outrage, demands for retraction, the usual theater of performative offense. But here's the question nobody in the professional pundit class wants to answer:
Which word, exactly, was wrong?
Was it "radical"? Because the guys waving black flags and throwing gay people off buildings seem pretty comfortable with the label.
Was it "Islam"? Because they sure as hell invoke it. Loudly. Repeatedly. In 4K video.
Was it "revolutionary"? Read Hasan al-Banna. Read Sayyid Qutb's Milestones. This isn't a fringe interpretation — it's the founding political theology of the Muslim Brotherhood, the ideological grandfather of Hamas, al-Qaeda, ISIS, and every jihadist franchise that's metastasized across six continents since 1979.
The playbook is explicit:
1Dawa — proselytization and demographic expansion
2Hijra — migration into target societies
3Jihad — when conditions are ripe, kinetic action
This isn't a conspiracy. It's published. It's taught. It's celebrated on Telegram channels with six-figure subscriber counts.
And the West's response for forty years has been to pretend not to see it while funding the very regimes that export it.
Rubio committed the unforgivable sin of naming the enemy. In an era where the foreign policy establishment prefers euphemisms like "violent extremism" and "overseas contingency operations," he used words that actually mean something.
The fury isn't about inaccuracy.
The fury is about accuracy without permission.
Why This Matters More Than Any Previous Speech
Because this isn't 2002. We've now lived through:
•The ISIS caliphate (which wasn't supposed to exist — until it did)
•The Taliban retaking Afghanistan in 10 days flat
•Hamas's October 7th massacre, livestreamed by the perpetrators
•The Houthis shutting down global shipping lanes from a sandpit
•The resurgence of al-Shabaab across the Horn of Africa
•Iran's network of proxies stretching from Beirut to Baghdad to Sana'a — now actively at war with American forces
And domestically? The FBI's own numbers show a consistent, non-random pattern of jihadist-inspired attacks on U.S. soil that the media covers with the enthusiasm of someone burying a body.
Rubio didn't say anything new.
He said something old — something that's been true for decades — but he said it from the podium of the State Department instead of from a think tank panel nobody watches.
That's the difference.
That's why they're panicking.
The Real Divide
The split isn't between "Islamophobes" and "tolerant people."
The split is between:
•People who believe ideas have consequences — and that a totalitarian political ideology dressed in theological language is still a totalitarian political ideology.
•People who believe words are magic — and that if we just stop talking about the problem, the problem will politely cease to exist.
Spencer Pratt (@spencerpratt) needs to tell his voters to check their ballot status and file a complaint if it hasn't been received yet.
MANY people who voted for Spencer are finding out their ballots haven't been received.
You can check ballot status here: https://t.co/h6ftjTv9Ry
🚨EXCLUSIVE J6 INVESTIGATION🚨
- Thanks to new House Speaker Mike Johnson, We now have permission to release Capitol CCTV footage proving that a member of Nancy Pelosi's security detail, Special Agent David Lazarus, perjured himself on the stand during the Oath Keepers trial.
- Lazarus was brought in to corroborate another Capitol police officer's account claiming that he had antagonistic encounter with the Oath Keepers. But footage of Lazarus proves that he was lying.
- These lies, spread unquestioningly by the media and Democrat politicians, were used to put innocent people in prison, ruining their lives and the lives of their families. They and their attorneys did not have access to the footage at trial that Blaze Media is releasing today.
- Instead, Harry Dunn was made a hero by Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi, and as a result of his and David Lazarus's false testimony, there are innocent people in prison.
- The government lied about this. What else are they lying about?
California Democrats are so corrupt
Chad Bianco seized 650,000 ballots because 46,000 ballots appeared out of nowhere and he wanted to investigate
- California Attorney General Rob Bonta contacted him and told him not to investigate, he refused
- So AG Rob Bonta took him to court, the court sided with Chad Bianco
- AG Rob Bonta took it to the court of appeals, it failed. They threw out the case and sided with Chad Bianco
It should have stopped there but it didn’t
“So now he's gone into civil court to sue us. And unfortunately, the Superior Court judge who has already ruled on this, that told us to count the ballots, now that there's a civil case, he is not allowing it anymore”
Let me remind everyone that all Chad Bianco wants to do is very accuracy because tens of thousands of ballots seem to not belong
The only goal was to physically hand-count the ballots to verify the totals and investigate potential fraud, machine issues, or human error
Democrats are going to great lengths to stop a hand count…. Why?
We all know. Democrats are rigging elections
Nine years ago, I was a brand-new mom and a completely innocent Cambridge historian.
Then the Russia Hoax hit, and I watched my entire life get ripped apart.
The man who sat at the very top of that whole operation was Barack Obama.
It was an organized conspiracy.
The weaponization of the intelligence agencies against a political opponent, Donald Trump, had the fingerprints of the sitting president, Barrack Obama, all over it.
Let’s be clear.
Immediately after Trump won in 2016, Obama personally ordered his intelligence chiefs to crank out the now-infamous “Obama Dossier”—the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment.
Obama gave his intelligence chiefs the conclusion: President Trump was installed by Russia, and that his National Security Advisor General Michael Flynn colluded with Russian intelligence.
That document became the official green light for two solid years of leaks, lies, and lawfare aimed at crippling the incoming Trump administration. In its classified section hidden in plain sight was the false Flynn allegation.
The 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment completely relied on the fraudulent "Steele Dossier." On January 5, 2017, Obama was fully briefed on the Steele Dossier—fabricated smears against Donald Trump and his advisors, paid for by the Clinton campaign. Obama knew exactly where it came from and how fake it was.
Yet his team directed that this garbage shaped key intelligence judgments and used it to justify the persecution of President Trump and his associates.
Crossfire Hurricane—the FBI’s full-blown counterintelligence probe into the Trump campaign—was already rolling under his watch. The whole scheme rested on the flimsiest predicate imaginable—Special Counsel John Durham later confirmed that. Obama’s White House ordered regular updates on the "investigation's" progress.
John Brennan and his inner circle ran point. Crucially the targeting of General Michael Flynn started while Obama was in the Oval Office.
All this activity went far beyond passive oversight. Direction came straight from the very top.
I lived through the fallout. The same machine Obama’s people enabled turned a simple academic dinner into a spy smear against me and painted General Flynn as a Russian asset. A highly-paid CIA asset lied to the FBI that I had an affair with Gen. Flynn. Careers were shattered. Reputations were torched. An entire presidency was hobbled before it even got off the ground.
These were the crimes against the Constitution—abuse of power, weaponization of intelligence, and interference in a peaceful transfer of power. All of it was orchestrated or green-lit from the highest levels.
Far from being some distant guy who got “briefed and forgot,” Obama made the call that kicked the whole process into gear the moment his party lost the election. That timing came as no accident. It was the whole point.
The Durham Report, fresh declassifications, and ongoing investigations are finally dragging the full truth into the light—the truth so many of us have known for years.
Every American must see it too.
If you want the unfiltered story about Obama, the man who tried to steal the 2016 election, and then overthrow President Trump through lawfare and intelligence abuse, hit follow, turn on notifications, and subscribe.