AlphaProMax

@AlphaProMaxxx

Alpha | We Are Dreaming

Joined June 2018

948 Following

2K Followers

1.6K Posts

AlphaProMax @AlphaProMaxxx

41 minutes ago

@apinttoomany He was hard shilling

0

0

0

0

6

AlphaProMax @AlphaProMaxxx

about 7 hours ago

The rug of robinhood:0x72d5bf142874d24d1565f8633621307fd2871111 by Torch Dev has to be studied by all Degens. Torch is next More to be Revealed soon….

AlphaProMax @AlphaProMaxxx

about 24 hours ago

$TORCH holders have to consider three things before sitting comfortably while holding $TORCH I will tell you those three things in my next tweet but I want you to know that ANTI token that every Torch Kols shilled you has just rugged. Stay safe

AlphaProMaxxx's tweet photo. $TORCH holders have to consider three things before sitting comfortably while holding $TORCH
I will tell you those three things in my next tweet but I want you to know that ANTI token that every Torch Kols shilled you has just rugged. Stay safe https://t.co/AvLt4XRaVF

7

8

2

2

3K

6

5

0

2

936

AlphaProMaxxx retweeted

about 1 hour ago

A bunch of KOLs are bull-posting $ANTI & $TORCH after allegedly getting paid by the devs and team to control the narrative. They pumped the price from $200K to $1.6M MC and started posting on X that we're going to $10M and beyond. Blah, blah, blah. Meanwhile, I noticed some wallets selling heavily. When we checked on-chain, those wallets had never bought a single token. They had only received tokens from the devs and were using them to bull-post. @tryantimatter Team looks extremely shady. Be careful with this shit. Avoid blindly trusting these projects, especially on Robinhood Chain. Even @0xshikima was bull-posting $ANTI when it was at a $1.4M MC, calling for a 10x, then allegedly sold his entire position just minutes later. Always check the on-chain data. Don't become someone else's exit liquidity.

1

5

1

0

218

AlphaProMax @AlphaProMaxxx

about 1 hour ago

@apinttoomany On Telegram

1

0

0

0

15

Who to follow

Chartered accountant in the making🤔|| Introvert|| Taurus♉|| JESUS BOY|| FOOTBALL LOVER⚽

basketball player 🏀|20🤞🏾

Tommie ✨✌️

🇳🇬 || ♊️ || Textile Designer || 🧑‍🎨 Front End Developer 👨🏼‍💻 || Entrepreneur 🤲 || Chelsea Fan 💙

AlphaProMax @AlphaProMaxxx

about 3 hours ago

Bunch of Kols bullposting $TORCH after being paid by Dev to control the narrative that $TORCH is a farmed and bundled token by the Dev and his Kols. Info reaching me is that this Kols won't rest until your bag is gone. DYOR and protect your liquidity

AlphaProMaxxx's tweet photo. Bunch of Kols bullposting $TORCH after being paid by Dev to control the narrative that $TORCH is a farmed and bundled token by the Dev and his Kols. Info reaching me is that this Kols won't rest until your bag is gone.

DYOR and protect your liquidity https://t.co/4sX2wo2lGa

2 days ago

In my previous post, I covered robinhood:0x000050e18ffa3f8f7ad170eb9cef160eb3ed1111's narrative, product, and tokenomics. This time, I wanted to dig deeper into the on-chain data, particularly bundles, fresh wallets, and supply distribution After going through the data, I found a few concerning details behind its rally from the $2–3M range to nearly $20M market cap First, robinhood:0x000050e18ffa3f8f7ad170eb9cef160eb3ed1111 currently has around 3,883 holders, with the top 10 holding 23.2% and the top 20 controlling 32.8% of the supply. These numbers aren't particularly unusual on their own, but what caught my attention is that fresh wallets currently hold around 19.4% of the total supply Among the top holders, 21 wallets are less than 7 days old, including 19 created within the past 24 hours. Another 5 wallets that had never traded any tokens before robinhood:0x000050e18ffa3f8f7ad170eb9cef160eb3ed1111 currently hold around 7.2% of the supply, while 11 wallets flagged across multiple risk categories collectively hold 5.8% Looking at bundles, approximately 14% of the supply was purchased through bundles at launch. Around 7% was subsequently transferred to other addresses rather than sold directly on DEXs I also identified 12 clusters consisting of 35 wallets that collectively purchased around 14.4% of the supply. After accounting for subsequent repurchases, the amount of supply currently associated with bundles is estimated at approximately 12.77% Interestingly, 5 fresh wallets among the top holders share funding connections with bundle wallets and currently hold around 3.6% of the supply. Some tokens have also been transferred through multiple intermediary wallets, making it harder to trace their ultimate ownership Digging deeper, I identified several addresses worth paying attention to : 0x5f7f450d326417f891fff05f4bf4ef59f9be2263 – Shows signs of involvement in bundle activity, sniping, and fresh wallet activity 0xc5363a2dc862976fc9608a52a60a297853b07512 - Has funding connections and received tokens from early buyers 0x1684df10974d9fecd36a0ac515a03146aceaa1f0 – Shows potential connections to funding activity and insider-related transactions Among these, 2 early buyers transferred approximately 1% of the supply to the same address. After expanding my analysis, I found 6 related early buyers involved in consolidating around 2.14% of the supply across 3 wallets Another cluster of 3 connected wallets currently holds approximately 3.08% of the supply. Based on a liquidity simulation, selling their entire position directly into the pool could result in slippage of up to 40.4%. This is only a hypothetical scenario, not a prediction that these wallets will dump Another area I'm particularly interested in is liquidity According to the data I reviewed, robinhood:0x000050e18ffa3f8f7ad170eb9cef160eb3ed1111 has around $3.3M in liquidity. However, after examining 80 liquidity positions on Uniswap V4, I couldn't verify that any of them were locked or burned. TorchFactory was also identified as managing approximately 85% of the associated liquidity This is something I'd like to see clarified, as the team previously stated that liquidity was permanently locked. However, Uniswap V4 has a more complex liquidity management structure, so being unable to verify the LP lock doesn't necessarily mean the team can withdraw liquidity I also found 2 wallets that previously appeared in tokens flagged for potential rug-related activity : 0x7d8eb200c45c273e3bef1bc55c09f76805158e96 – Previously appeared in $MIND, $MNRA, and $AUTOMA 0xfee5fee50000062bd986e86502c5acdf989067a0 – Previously appeared in $ROBINPEPE and $ZATS This alone isn't enough to conclude that these wallets belong to the robinhood:0x000050e18ffa3f8f7ad170eb9cef160eb3ed1111 team or are involved in market manipulation On the positive side, a sniper group that previously acquired around 2.8% of the supply, along with another pair of bots that bought 0.5%, have both fully exited their positions. The deployer's history also hasn't revealed clear evidence of a rug pattern Overall, I still appreciate what Torch is building and the pace at which the team has been shipping updates. However, the on-chain data shows that a significant portion of the supply is held by fresh wallets, several wallet clusters share funding connections, and the liquidity lock situation still needs further verification For me, robinhood:0x000050e18ffa3f8f7ad170eb9cef160eb3ed1111 is still a project worth watching, but after such a strong rally, I'd rather focus on managing risk than FOMO into the current price levels 0x000050E18ffa3F8F7aD170Eb9CeF160eb3Ed1111

stitchdegen's tweet photo. In my previous post, I covered robinhood:0x000050e18ffa3f8f7ad170eb9cef160eb3ed1111's narrative, product, and tokenomics. This time, I wanted to dig deeper into the on-chain data, particularly bundles, fresh wallets, and supply distribution

After going through the data, I found a few concerning details behind its rally from the $2–3M range to nearly $20M market cap

First, robinhood:0x000050e18ffa3f8f7ad170eb9cef160eb3ed1111 currently has around 3,883 holders, with the top 10 holding 23.2% and the top 20 controlling 32.8% of the supply. These numbers aren't particularly unusual on their own, but what caught my attention is that fresh wallets currently hold around 19.4% of the total supply

Among the top holders, 21 wallets are less than 7 days old, including 19 created within the past 24 hours. Another 5 wallets that had never traded any tokens before robinhood:0x000050e18ffa3f8f7ad170eb9cef160eb3ed1111 currently hold around 7.2% of the supply, while 11 wallets flagged across multiple risk categories collectively hold 5.8%

Looking at bundles, approximately 14% of the supply was purchased through bundles at launch. Around 7% was subsequently transferred to other addresses rather than sold directly on DEXs

I also identified 12 clusters consisting of 35 wallets that collectively purchased around 14.4% of the supply. After accounting for subsequent repurchases, the amount of supply currently associated with bundles is estimated at approximately 12.77%

Interestingly, 5 fresh wallets among the top holders share funding connections with bundle wallets and currently hold around 3.6% of the supply. Some tokens have also been transferred through multiple intermediary wallets, making it harder to trace their ultimate ownership

Digging deeper, I identified several addresses worth paying attention to :

0x5f7f450d326417f891fff05f4bf4ef59f9be2263 –
Shows signs of involvement in bundle activity, sniping, and fresh wallet activity

0xc5363a2dc862976fc9608a52a60a297853b07512 -
Has funding connections and received tokens from early buyers

0x1684df10974d9fecd36a0ac515a03146aceaa1f0 – Shows potential connections to funding activity and insider-related transactions

Among these, 2 early buyers transferred approximately 1% of the supply to the same address. After expanding my analysis, I found 6 related early buyers involved in consolidating around 2.14% of the supply across 3 wallets

Another cluster of 3 connected wallets currently holds approximately 3.08% of the supply. Based on a liquidity simulation, selling their entire position directly into the pool could result in slippage of up to 40.4%. This is only a hypothetical scenario, not a prediction that these wallets will dump

Another area I'm particularly interested in is liquidity

According to the data I reviewed, robinhood:0x000050e18ffa3f8f7ad170eb9cef160eb3ed1111 has around $3.3M in liquidity. However, after examining 80 liquidity positions on Uniswap V4, I couldn't verify that any of them were locked or burned. TorchFactory was also identified as managing approximately 85% of the associated liquidity

This is something I'd like to see clarified, as the team previously stated that liquidity was permanently locked. However, Uniswap V4 has a more complex liquidity management structure, so being unable to verify the LP lock doesn't necessarily mean the team can withdraw liquidity

I also found 2 wallets that previously appeared in tokens flagged for potential rug-related activity :

0x7d8eb200c45c273e3bef1bc55c09f76805158e96 – Previously appeared in $MIND, $MNRA, and $AUTOMA

0xfee5fee50000062bd986e86502c5acdf989067a0 – Previously appeared in $ROBINPEPE and $ZATS

This alone isn't enough to conclude that these wallets belong to the robinhood:0x000050e18ffa3f8f7ad170eb9cef160eb3ed1111 team or are involved in market manipulation

On the positive side, a sniper group that previously acquired around 2.8% of the supply, along with another pair of bots that bought 0.5%, have both fully exited their positions. The deployer's history also hasn't revealed clear evidence of a rug pattern

Overall, I still appreciate what Torch is building and the pace at which the team has been shipping updates. However, the on-chain data shows that a significant portion of the supply is held by fresh wallets, several wallet clusters share funding connections, and the liquidity lock situation still needs further verification

For me, robinhood:0x000050e18ffa3f8f7ad170eb9cef160eb3ed1111 is still a project worth watching, but after such a strong rally, I'd rather focus on managing risk than FOMO into the current price levels

0x000050E18ffa3F8F7aD170Eb9CeF160eb3Ed1111

stitchdegen's tweet photo. In my previous post, I covered robinhood:0x000050e18ffa3f8f7ad170eb9cef160eb3ed1111's narrative, product, and tokenomics. This time, I wanted to dig deeper into the on-chain data, particularly bundles, fresh wallets, and supply distribution

After going through the data, I found a few concerning details behind its rally from the $2–3M range to nearly $20M market cap

First, robinhood:0x000050e18ffa3f8f7ad170eb9cef160eb3ed1111 currently has around 3,883 holders, with the top 10 holding 23.2% and the top 20 controlling 32.8% of the supply. These numbers aren't particularly unusual on their own, but what caught my attention is that fresh wallets currently hold around 19.4% of the total supply

Among the top holders, 21 wallets are less than 7 days old, including 19 created within the past 24 hours. Another 5 wallets that had never traded any tokens before robinhood:0x000050e18ffa3f8f7ad170eb9cef160eb3ed1111 currently hold around 7.2% of the supply, while 11 wallets flagged across multiple risk categories collectively hold 5.8%

Looking at bundles, approximately 14% of the supply was purchased through bundles at launch. Around 7% was subsequently transferred to other addresses rather than sold directly on DEXs

I also identified 12 clusters consisting of 35 wallets that collectively purchased around 14.4% of the supply. After accounting for subsequent repurchases, the amount of supply currently associated with bundles is estimated at approximately 12.77%

Interestingly, 5 fresh wallets among the top holders share funding connections with bundle wallets and currently hold around 3.6% of the supply. Some tokens have also been transferred through multiple intermediary wallets, making it harder to trace their ultimate ownership

Digging deeper, I identified several addresses worth paying attention to :

0x5f7f450d326417f891fff05f4bf4ef59f9be2263 –
Shows signs of involvement in bundle activity, sniping, and fresh wallet activity

0xc5363a2dc862976fc9608a52a60a297853b07512 -
Has funding connections and received tokens from early buyers

0x1684df10974d9fecd36a0ac515a03146aceaa1f0 – Shows potential connections to funding activity and insider-related transactions

Among these, 2 early buyers transferred approximately 1% of the supply to the same address. After expanding my analysis, I found 6 related early buyers involved in consolidating around 2.14% of the supply across 3 wallets

Another cluster of 3 connected wallets currently holds approximately 3.08% of the supply. Based on a liquidity simulation, selling their entire position directly into the pool could result in slippage of up to 40.4%. This is only a hypothetical scenario, not a prediction that these wallets will dump

Another area I'm particularly interested in is liquidity

According to the data I reviewed, robinhood:0x000050e18ffa3f8f7ad170eb9cef160eb3ed1111 has around $3.3M in liquidity. However, after examining 80 liquidity positions on Uniswap V4, I couldn't verify that any of them were locked or burned. TorchFactory was also identified as managing approximately 85% of the associated liquidity

This is something I'd like to see clarified, as the team previously stated that liquidity was permanently locked. However, Uniswap V4 has a more complex liquidity management structure, so being unable to verify the LP lock doesn't necessarily mean the team can withdraw liquidity

I also found 2 wallets that previously appeared in tokens flagged for potential rug-related activity :

0x7d8eb200c45c273e3bef1bc55c09f76805158e96 – Previously appeared in $MIND, $MNRA, and $AUTOMA

0xfee5fee50000062bd986e86502c5acdf989067a0 – Previously appeared in $ROBINPEPE and $ZATS

This alone isn't enough to conclude that these wallets belong to the robinhood:0x000050e18ffa3f8f7ad170eb9cef160eb3ed1111 team or are involved in market manipulation

On the positive side, a sniper group that previously acquired around 2.8% of the supply, along with another pair of bots that bought 0.5%, have both fully exited their positions. The deployer's history also hasn't revealed clear evidence of a rug pattern

Overall, I still appreciate what Torch is building and the pace at which the team has been shipping updates. However, the on-chain data shows that a significant portion of the supply is held by fresh wallets, several wallet clusters share funding connections, and the liquidity lock situation still needs further verification

For me, robinhood:0x000050e18ffa3f8f7ad170eb9cef160eb3ed1111 is still a project worth watching, but after such a strong rally, I'd rather focus on managing risk than FOMO into the current price levels

0x000050E18ffa3F8F7aD170Eb9CeF160eb3Ed1111

stitchdegen's tweet photo. In my previous post, I covered robinhood:0x000050e18ffa3f8f7ad170eb9cef160eb3ed1111's narrative, product, and tokenomics. This time, I wanted to dig deeper into the on-chain data, particularly bundles, fresh wallets, and supply distribution

After going through the data, I found a few concerning details behind its rally from the $2–3M range to nearly $20M market cap

First, robinhood:0x000050e18ffa3f8f7ad170eb9cef160eb3ed1111 currently has around 3,883 holders, with the top 10 holding 23.2% and the top 20 controlling 32.8% of the supply. These numbers aren't particularly unusual on their own, but what caught my attention is that fresh wallets currently hold around 19.4% of the total supply

Among the top holders, 21 wallets are less than 7 days old, including 19 created within the past 24 hours. Another 5 wallets that had never traded any tokens before robinhood:0x000050e18ffa3f8f7ad170eb9cef160eb3ed1111 currently hold around 7.2% of the supply, while 11 wallets flagged across multiple risk categories collectively hold 5.8%

Looking at bundles, approximately 14% of the supply was purchased through bundles at launch. Around 7% was subsequently transferred to other addresses rather than sold directly on DEXs

I also identified 12 clusters consisting of 35 wallets that collectively purchased around 14.4% of the supply. After accounting for subsequent repurchases, the amount of supply currently associated with bundles is estimated at approximately 12.77%

Interestingly, 5 fresh wallets among the top holders share funding connections with bundle wallets and currently hold around 3.6% of the supply. Some tokens have also been transferred through multiple intermediary wallets, making it harder to trace their ultimate ownership

Digging deeper, I identified several addresses worth paying attention to :

0x5f7f450d326417f891fff05f4bf4ef59f9be2263 –
Shows signs of involvement in bundle activity, sniping, and fresh wallet activity

0xc5363a2dc862976fc9608a52a60a297853b07512 -
Has funding connections and received tokens from early buyers

0x1684df10974d9fecd36a0ac515a03146aceaa1f0 – Shows potential connections to funding activity and insider-related transactions

Among these, 2 early buyers transferred approximately 1% of the supply to the same address. After expanding my analysis, I found 6 related early buyers involved in consolidating around 2.14% of the supply across 3 wallets

Another cluster of 3 connected wallets currently holds approximately 3.08% of the supply. Based on a liquidity simulation, selling their entire position directly into the pool could result in slippage of up to 40.4%. This is only a hypothetical scenario, not a prediction that these wallets will dump

Another area I'm particularly interested in is liquidity

According to the data I reviewed, robinhood:0x000050e18ffa3f8f7ad170eb9cef160eb3ed1111 has around $3.3M in liquidity. However, after examining 80 liquidity positions on Uniswap V4, I couldn't verify that any of them were locked or burned. TorchFactory was also identified as managing approximately 85% of the associated liquidity

This is something I'd like to see clarified, as the team previously stated that liquidity was permanently locked. However, Uniswap V4 has a more complex liquidity management structure, so being unable to verify the LP lock doesn't necessarily mean the team can withdraw liquidity

I also found 2 wallets that previously appeared in tokens flagged for potential rug-related activity :

0x7d8eb200c45c273e3bef1bc55c09f76805158e96 – Previously appeared in $MIND, $MNRA, and $AUTOMA

0xfee5fee50000062bd986e86502c5acdf989067a0 – Previously appeared in $ROBINPEPE and $ZATS

This alone isn't enough to conclude that these wallets belong to the robinhood:0x000050e18ffa3f8f7ad170eb9cef160eb3ed1111 team or are involved in market manipulation

On the positive side, a sniper group that previously acquired around 2.8% of the supply, along with another pair of bots that bought 0.5%, have both fully exited their positions. The deployer's history also hasn't revealed clear evidence of a rug pattern

Overall, I still appreciate what Torch is building and the pace at which the team has been shipping updates. However, the on-chain data shows that a significant portion of the supply is held by fresh wallets, several wallet clusters share funding connections, and the liquidity lock situation still needs further verification

For me, robinhood:0x000050e18ffa3f8f7ad170eb9cef160eb3ed1111 is still a project worth watching, but after such a strong rally, I'd rather focus on managing risk than FOMO into the current price levels

0x000050E18ffa3F8F7aD170Eb9CeF160eb3Ed1111

22

73

6

31

12K

6

2

0

0

652

AlphaProMaxxx retweeted

AlphaProMax @AlphaProMaxxx

about 23 hours ago

Let's talk about how $TORCH dev blocks 99% of holders of Torch on his Telegram group from speaking much. Dev of a bundled coin that will never reveal his face because he knows he will nuke the chat alongside his Kols shilling $TORCH

5

4

4

1

1K

AlphaProMax @AlphaProMaxxx

about 4 hours ago

Cosby and other Kols keep buying on FOMO but they are selling their side wallets right now 💔😂

0

1

0

0

19

AlphaProMax @AlphaProMaxxx

about 9 hours ago

Now the dip has happened on robinhood:0x000050e18ffa3f8f7ad170eb9cef160eb3ed1111 and the next phase is the rug phase where it all goes to zero. Torch exists to burn your bag. All you can do now is pray so you don’t lose your bag totally. GOODLUCK!🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

AlphaProMax @AlphaProMaxxx

about 13 hours ago

Info reaching me about $TORCH speaks a lot about the project. I genuinely didn't believe this could be possible but anything is literally possible. Torch dev posted CA of $TORCH on his telegram channel immediately after launch so that only Cosby and all his other Kols can bundle Torch. Cosby is one of the Dev Kols and that's why he bought below 10k market cap with side wallets and at 366k market cap on FOMO

AlphaProMaxxx's tweet photo. Info reaching me about $TORCH speaks a lot about the project. I genuinely didn't believe this could be possible but anything is literally possible.
Torch dev posted CA of $TORCH on his telegram channel immediately after launch so that only Cosby and all his other Kols can bundle Torch. Cosby is one of the Dev Kols and that's why he bought below 10k market cap with side wallets and at 366k market cap on FOMO

5

3

0

0

4K

2

10

3

1

674

AlphaProMax @AlphaProMaxxx

about 4 hours ago

@musktoby1313 It’s not a random Dev. Check the telegram group and you will see the Dev was shilling his rugged coins days ago

0

0

0

0

32

AlphaProMax @AlphaProMaxxx

about 4 hours ago

@Victor078964474 Sorry. Protect your remaining Liquidity

1

1

0

0

21

AlphaProMax @AlphaProMaxxx

about 4 hours ago

@celticblocks This is probably one of Torch dev puppet 😂😂. Tell your Dev to continue using his bag to control the narrative.

1

0

0

0

32

AlphaProMax @AlphaProMaxxx

about 4 hours ago

@apinttoomany He shilled robinhood:0x72d5bf142874d24d1565f8633621307fd2871111 lots of times. That is his project. You will learn the hard way

1

0

0

0

29

AlphaProMax @AlphaProMaxxx

about 7 hours ago

@Jaxs84321807 Light their bags

0

0

0

0

27

AlphaProMax @AlphaProMaxxx

about 7 hours ago

@alexandrostsach Foe what?

1

1

0

0

14

AlphaProMax @AlphaProMaxxx

about 7 hours ago

@souroncat I’m not entering low or high. It’s a farmed chart. Protect your liquidity

0

0

0

0

33

AlphaProMax @AlphaProMaxxx

about 12 hours ago

You realizing $TORCH and Torchy is a farm, rug and a Larp after you nuke your bag hoping for another 2x You are the Exit Liquidity 💔💔

7

6

0

0

1K

AlphaProMax @AlphaProMaxxx

about 9 hours ago

@cyptotug I’m not moving on. Tell your Dev to unblock me

0

0

0

0

40

AlphaProMax @AlphaProMaxxx

about 11 hours ago

Info reaching me on $TORCH now is that they are trying to give $TORCH a little pump then sell Torch on their side wallets. If you are wise you will protect your liquidity and take whatever little bag you have left. DYOR

AlphaProMax @AlphaProMaxxx

about 13 hours ago

Info reaching me about $TORCH speaks a lot about the project. I genuinely didn't believe this could be possible but anything is literally possible. Torch dev posted CA of $TORCH on his telegram channel immediately after launch so that only Cosby and all his other Kols can bundle Torch. Cosby is one of the Dev Kols and that's why he bought below 10k market cap with side wallets and at 366k market cap on FOMO

AlphaProMaxxx's tweet photo. Info reaching me about $TORCH speaks a lot about the project. I genuinely didn't believe this could be possible but anything is literally possible.
Torch dev posted CA of $TORCH on his telegram channel immediately after launch so that only Cosby and all his other Kols can bundle Torch. Cosby is one of the Dev Kols and that's why he bought below 10k market cap with side wallets and at 366k market cap on FOMO

5

3

0

0

4K

5

6

0

1

1K

AlphaProMax @AlphaProMaxxx

about 9 hours ago

What I said here just happened

0

0

0

0

100

AlphaProMax @AlphaProMaxxx

about 11 hours ago

You are the Exit Liquidity….. can the dev just rethink and farm robinhood:0x000050e18ffa3f8f7ad170eb9cef160eb3ed1111 again so he can exit when you all buy because of FOMO

AlphaProMaxxx's tweet photo. You are the Exit Liquidity….. can the dev just rethink and farm robinhood:0x000050e18ffa3f8f7ad170eb9cef160eb3ed1111 again so he can exit when you all buy because of FOMO https://t.co/3UQ7J55ZIb

0

0

0

0

141

AlphaProMax @AlphaProMaxxx

about 13 hours ago

Info reaching me about $TORCH speaks a lot about the project. I genuinely didn't believe this could be possible but anything is literally possible. Torch dev posted CA of $TORCH on his telegram channel immediately after launch so that only Cosby and all his other Kols can bundle Torch. Cosby is one of the Dev Kols and that's why he bought below 10k market cap with side wallets and at 366k market cap on FOMO

AlphaProMaxxx's tweet photo. Info reaching me about $TORCH speaks a lot about the project. I genuinely didn't believe this could be possible but anything is literally possible.
Torch dev posted CA of $TORCH on his telegram channel immediately after launch so that only Cosby and all his other Kols can bundle Torch. Cosby is one of the Dev Kols and that's why he bought below 10k market cap with side wallets and at 366k market cap on FOMO

5

3

0

0

4K

AlphaProMax @AlphaProMaxxx

about 11 hours ago

@ColdCaseCrypto Come with sense, you degen. Oh no you can't 😂😂😂 You have all been talking about me on your Telegram channel where only paid kols can comment... you all are scared that the secret is about to get out of the bag. I know who you are!

1

1

0

0

68

AlphaProMax @AlphaProMaxxx

about 13 hours ago

$TORCH main page has also blocked me. Now I am beginning to think that they are hiding more than I already know about their bundled coin. More details in my next tweets. Before then pls don't rug, pls $TORCH

AlphaProMaxxx's tweet photo. $TORCH main page has also blocked me. Now I am beginning to think that they are hiding more than I already know about their bundled coin. More details in my next tweets.

Before then pls don't rug, pls $TORCH https://t.co/sQ0scIwl3g

AlphaProMax @AlphaProMaxxx

about 13 hours ago

Info reaching me about $TORCH speaks a lot about the project. I genuinely didn't believe this could be possible but anything is literally possible. Torch dev posted CA of $TORCH on his telegram channel immediately after launch so that only Cosby and all his other Kols can bundle Torch. Cosby is one of the Dev Kols and that's why he bought below 10k market cap with side wallets and at 366k market cap on FOMO

AlphaProMaxxx's tweet photo. Info reaching me about $TORCH speaks a lot about the project. I genuinely didn't believe this could be possible but anything is literally possible.
Torch dev posted CA of $TORCH on his telegram channel immediately after launch so that only Cosby and all his other Kols can bundle Torch. Cosby is one of the Dev Kols and that's why he bought below 10k market cap with side wallets and at 366k market cap on FOMO

5

3

0

0

4K

3

4

0

2

986

Last Seen Users on Sotwe

Trends for you

Most Popular Users