@stringofunicode@sarin024@ruicharadrius If it's not rigid can it be considered a case system I thought the whole point of castes is that you're locked in one and can't change it
@ryonishimiyaa Letters from an alphabet and Chinese characters are completely different. Letters purely represent the pronunciation of the word and thus there is a lower amount of them. Chinese characters are more like roots or complete words and not letters so of course there's more of them
@ryonishimiyaa The video compares the Cyrillic *alphabet* with the Chinese language which doesn't use an alphabet but uses hieroglyphics for its writing. These are too different to actually compare
@greasygrouper@animun_online@qepmy3rd@dobby457 Yeah but physically you have 0 apples. The fact you owe someone apples isnt you actually physically having a negative amount of apples, it's you not having any, and having a negative amount of apples "on paper".
@animun_online@qepmy3rd@dobby457 By not having any apples. This argument only works with negative numbers because you actually cannot have a negative amount of something but its very possible to have 0 apples