Keef

[Keef @AmericaOnlyAF]

@PopeThe48695 @DAQUANDSG Easily a reasonable justification (imminent bodily harm or injury) for deadly force like Zimmerman & rittenhouse case.

[Keef @AmericaOnlyAF]

@PopeThe48695 @DAQUANDSG His statements online is irrelevant to the specific case. Fox the aggressor closed the distance to Chud who was walking away omitted by Lead investigator while Fox threatening violence (If u say XYZ to my face I’ll get violent), punched him, taken him the ground, headlock. -

[Keef @AmericaOnlyAF]

@PopeThe48695 @DAQUANDSG reasonably fearing imminent attack. Tennessee is a Stand Your Ground state: No duty to retreat if lawfully present. You can use deadly force upon reasonable belief of imminent death or serious bodily injury

[Keef @AmericaOnlyAF]

@PopeThe48695 @DAQUANDSG Hey retard, the investigator noted Chud gripped the gun as Fox was aggressively closing distance and taking a bladed stance before the punch, but in direct response to pursuit after disengagement. Gripping (or even drawing) isn’t automatically “lethal escalation” if you’re-

[Keef @AmericaOnlyAF]

@PopeThe48695 @DAQUANDSG reasonably fearing imminent attack. Tennessee is a Stand Your Ground state: No duty to retreat if lawfully present. You can use deadly force upon reasonable belief of imminent death or serious bodily injury

[Keef @AmericaOnlyAF]

@lilRyanxxxx @PopeThe48695 @DAQUANDSG imminent bodily injury or death which is all u need to justify deadly force according to Tennessee law?

both the Zimmerman and Rittenhouse cases strongly illustrate that self-def law prioritizes the defendant’s reasonable belief at the moment force was used, NOT 20/20 HINDSIGHT

[Keef @AmericaOnlyAF]

@lilRyanxxxx @PopeThe48695 @DAQUANDSG I think it sets a slippery slope when it comes to self defense for everybody. Remove racially charged bias, if someone walks away then followed- then says they have ptsd & threatening to get violent,- punches,- takes u to ground- headlocks. how is this not reasonable belief of-

[Keef @AmericaOnlyAF]

@frankflynn20016 @PopeThe48695 @DAQUANDSG The defense can bring it up as it attacks fox’s credibility & pertinent to the facts of the case since fox talked about fighting Chud to boost his twitch career on January.

[Keef @AmericaOnlyAF]

@lilRyanxxxx @PopeThe48695 @DAQUANDSG Chud took a bladed stance (gripped his gun or mace inside his jacket) when Fox closed the distance on him while Chud was walking away. Taking a bladed stance itself is not a crime.

And he was vindicated to do so, Fox punched him regardless, taken him to the ground, & head locked

[Keef @AmericaOnlyAF]

@lilRyanxxxx @PopeThe48695 @DAQUANDSG Wait till trial till it all comes out and released. Webber confirmed all the witness testimonies cuz they seen the livestream. Meaning they can hear EXACTLY what chud said & Fox said before the camera drops down when taken to the ground .

[Keef @AmericaOnlyAF]

@lilRyanxxxx @PopeThe48695 @DAQUANDSG Joshua closed the distance and punched him chud first what are you talking about?

No one said ptsd is fighting words. Chud didn’t throw the first punch.

[Keef @AmericaOnlyAF]

@lilRyanxxxx @PopeThe48695 @DAQUANDSG It does-

1. He wasn’t the antagonizer and tried to disengage & walk away which they will look at and it proves that Fox was the aggressor and antagonizer.

2. Fox is a former criminal with a background of his own (DV, stalking, sex offender, etc)

[Keef @AmericaOnlyAF]

@lilRyanxxxx @PopeThe48695 @DAQUANDSG “Or what you gonna chimp out” IS NOT FIGHTING WORDS. For that to be fighting words IT NEEDS TO BE FOLLOWED UP WITH IMMINENT THREAT IF VIOLENCE.

Actual fight words example: “I’m going to beat your ass”

[Keef @AmericaOnlyAF]

@lilRyanxxxx @PopeThe48695 @DAQUANDSG “Why is fox not allowed to tell chud that he has ptsd and to not say the Er and chimp stuff?”

He said that that he got ptsd and if you say XYZ to my face he’s gonna get violent which he did. PTSD means he can reasonably believe military, trained vet, unstable, etc. Saying-

[Keef @AmericaOnlyAF]

@lilRyanxxxx @PopeThe48695 @DAQUANDSG Pumpfun video & multiple witness testimonies who saw & heard the confrontation said thats what they heard and the lead investigator Michael Webber who saw the Pumpfun video confirmed what they said that he walked away when Fox yelled GTFO holding the camera & was followed by Fox.

[Keef @AmericaOnlyAF]

@DietandFitness0 @PopeThe48695 @DAQUANDSG Just because you’re racist doesn’t mean you don’t have a right to self defense retard. You’re making a moral argument, I’m making a lawful argument. Chud acted in self defense. I don’t have to agree w Chud politically or morally to see that.

[Keef @AmericaOnlyAF]

@lilRyanxxxx @PopeThe48695 @DAQUANDSG 1. Can’t be premeditation if Fox was the antagonizer & the aggressor in this specific case, Lead investigator testified that he walked away & agreed to the fact pattern.

2. Chuds tweet is a prediction, Fox tweet is a descriptive intent to fight Chud specifically. Cancels out

[Keef @AmericaOnlyAF]

@lilRyanxxxx @PopeThe48695 @DAQUANDSG He didn’t start issues when he pointed at him. He walked up and said hi then when yelled at to leave, he did.

Walking up to someone pointing at you and saying hi is not antagonizer or aggressor 🤣 what kind of precedent does that set if it was.

[Keef @AmericaOnlyAF]

@DietandFitness0 @PopeThe48695 @DAQUANDSG Being factual & impartial looking at the fact pattern that the lead investigator & witnesses testified, even though I don’t like the dudes content, isn’t dicksucking. You sound like a retarded emotional progressive.

Chud has a legitimate self defense case. Attack the argument 🤡

[Keef @AmericaOnlyAF]

@DonzZombiie @PopeThe48695 @DAQUANDSG Being factual & impartial looking at the fact pattern that the lead investigator & witnesses testified, even though I don’t like the dudes content, isn’t dicksucking. You sound like a retarded emotional progressive.

Chud has a legitimate self defense case. Attack the argument 🤡