@BullMooseMemes@BigRockInsights The left does strategic redefining all the time, why can’t we do a little linguistic engineering ourselves? What should we start calling them? And what should we call ourselves? Is it a simple flip? Idk if calling ourselves minorities carries nobility so something else
@HomericFuturist We can’t vote them out. We can’t physically remove them. It’s our job as citizens to make their lives so miserable they leave on their own accord. Bullying, harassing, embarrassing, excluding, boycotting businesses, etc.
@DoDeportations The root of the problem, other than them existing on our continent of course, is the media and dating apps that are literally pushing propaganda and algorithms to make women think it’s ok and safe.
@CatMatheney@GovCox@AmericanFreedom But won’t they lose power if they keep doing things against us then that money dries up? Like it’s in their best interest to keep us happy.
@JMatrix20266053@saltyutahn Do you see how active the left is when it comes to politics? Their protests, marches, articles, etc. they put their money where their mouth is especially compared to people on the right. The most politically active a person on the right will get is commenting “usual suspects”
Americans need to drop this idea that we owe allegiance to our institutions. When they stop working for us they are purposeless. The English didn’t cease to exist when they went from a monarch to parliament, from feudal to mercantile. A nation can’t survive total replacement.
@giMbOiD999@GovCox@AmericanFreedom I feel like you could validate gondolas and stadiums in terms of being fun/entertaining for the public, I don’t think you can validate bringing in immigrants to work in THE YOUNGEST STATE IN THE COUNTRY.
@DanBell@ChristianHeiens Nothing at all, politicians are essentially saying “if you vote for us republicans we will attempt to slow down how hard we fuck you over in the short term” the right is too reactionary, we need to be make demands for future policies not just begging for them to undo past ones.
@DanBell@ChristianHeiens While I agree for the most part two things would happen, the cost wouldn’t disappear it would just be transferred to their children or they would have to work another decade. Secondly older generations will never vote for it because they had to pay in, so it’ll never happen.
@UtahFlatRanger If we can’t afford shit while they are here then who cares if we can’t afford shit when they are gone? England has survived monarchies, crown rule, parliamentary republic, military dictatorships, etc. yet England still exists today because its people exist. We aren’t our systems.
@DrMethos@ChristianHeiens The issue is that our economy today is based on consumerism, so if a large chunk of the population dies out there are fewer customers. Businesses will just downscale or close to match the smaller demand they will need less workers to create less products Still wouldn’t hurt tho🤷🏻♂️