Amicus Curious

[Amicus Curious @Amicus_Curious_]

@thescottbarber Wait. I think I saw this show.

[Amicus Curious @Amicus_Curious_]

@hawkeylassie Imagine requiring that food handlers have basic food safety training. How egregious! 🙄

[Amicus Curious @Amicus_Curious_]

@GenOgreX @fire_starter457 Wrong. “Because Indiana's cards are free, the inconvenience of going to the Bureau of Motor Vehicles, gathering required documents, and posing for a photograph does not qualify as a substantial burden on most voters' right to vote,”

[Amicus Curious @Amicus_Curious_]

@MehekCooke The First Amendment says otherwise. Please cite a specific law or rule of professional conduct that was violated here.

[Amicus Curious @Amicus_Curious_]

@apinionsvary Please cite the law or rule of professional conduct violated.

[Amicus Curious @Amicus_Curious_]

@awstar11 What rule of professional conduct do you believe he violated?

[Amicus Curious @Amicus_Curious_]

@ZazCarla @derek_debus And yet the law does not prevent a second trial after a mistrial. It’s not just, but it is the law.

[Amicus Curious @Amicus_Curious_]

@beachmamax2 This statement is protected by the safe harbor of Mass Rules of Professional Conduct. Attorneys are allowed to say that an investigation is in progress, state the results of any step in litigation, and share any information that is in the public record.

[Amicus Curious @Amicus_Curious_]

@Aerondyte0 This statement is protected by the safe harbor of Mass Rules of Professional Conduct. Attorneys are allowed to say that an investigation is in progress, state the results of any step in litigation, and share any information that is in the public record.

[Amicus Curious @Amicus_Curious_]

@ProfilerPatB Clearly you have no actual legal experience. This statement is clearly allowed under the Mass Rules of Professional Conduct 3.6(b) safe harbor

[Amicus Curious @Amicus_Curious_]

@TSA Citing your own rule isn’t really a “receipt”

[Amicus Curious @Amicus_Curious_]

@nickwoj98 According to their methodology, size=beauty, among other terrible assumptions

[Amicus Curious @Amicus_Curious_]

@GovPritzker This is a very flawed methodology for determining beauty.

[Amicus Curious @Amicus_Curious_]

@jablesspat @libsoftiktok @googlemaps The statute does not set the name of the lake. It merely refers to it by that name. There is a difference.

[Amicus Curious @Amicus_Curious_]

@coachFMartin Um. OK. Good luck with that.

[Amicus Curious @Amicus_Curious_]

@Zachary_Starr_ @libsoftiktok @googlemaps The statute does not set the name of the lake. It merely refers to it by that name. There is a difference.

[Amicus Curious @Amicus_Curious_]

@craigwarmke @nic94817 “we?” When did you join the Princeton faculty?

[Amicus Curious @Amicus_Curious_]

@OneMileataTime And if you bring your own plastic cup, that’s perfectly fine to have.

[Amicus Curious @Amicus_Curious_]

@SteveLovesAmmo It’s a good thing the US Supreme Court disagrees with you.

[Amicus Curious @Amicus_Curious_]

@bayesianboy This is scare-mongering clickbait. I can’t imagine a situation where an academic publication would not fit the human review exception to the law.