So Digital ID is just for us plebs.
MPs & Royalty will be exempt
“for security reasons”
We won’t be able to do anything without permission but they can do whatever they like.
Anyone else smell a rat?
@Andallthat@triffic_stuff_@leicesterliz She has been promoted to a job well beyond her capabilities. She sure does look like she enjoys the power! Who the hell does she think she is? Talking to the voters as if they were school kids
@triffic_stuff_ This @leicesterliz character is just parroting the company line to keep her pathetic little post. Nobody believes this 'ooh, let's save the children' bs on the gov mouthpiece channel.
🚨UPDATE : Not only may Keir Starmers social media ban be in breach of Article 8 it may now also be in breach of Article 10 of the ECHR.
And yes the ECHRs rights extends to children.
@MahyarTousi@elonmusk So what has changed for the Iranian people thousands of whom have died? So not about saving them at all. A 'deal' with the same evil regime.
Trump could release US-Iran deal before Friday, Vance says - BBC News https://t.co/0Q3BszFurZ
🚨🇬🇧🇷🇺 Yesterday the UK Government conveniently had Cameras & a Professional Film Crew recording British Marines Capturing a ‘Russian Shadow Fleet Vessel’.
Today BBC & Politicians want you to believe Russia are employing Rent Boys to burn down Keir Starmer’s Homes.
It’s all so obvious & pathetically tiring - every day more orchestrated lies are inflicted upon the public.
The panic-stricken efforts by the state to force digital ID on the proles while simultaneously securing anonymity and cover for themselves and their own is a wonder to behold.
@KemiBadenoch Of course. Those sneaky Russians. The uniparty says so. It must be true. Mind you, got back to my car the other day and found a flat tyre. Swear I saw a bloke in a big fur hat hanging around.
🚨NEW: YouTube has released a statement regarding Keir Starmer’s announcement of BANNING social media for under 16s 🇬🇧
"YouTube is a vital resource for young people, educators and parents. Blanket bans push kids out of such curated, supervised, beneficial experiences and towards anonymous, less safe services"
Unfortunately, that’s exactly where Starmer would like children to be, in less safe spaces - hence why he isn’t going to ban BlueSky….
Australia banned X for children but not BlueSky.
Britain is banning X for children but not BlueSky.
This proves one thing.
It's not about protecting children.
It's about censorship and controlling the narrative.
@MumsnetTowers If only we could believe that was the real reason. If you don't want your children exposed to this stuff then don't buy them the tools. Don't wait for BIG BROTHER to tell you what to do.