Andrew

[Andrew @Andrew85078708]

@ZoeLFrancis You have raised a good point and it raises future questions with relation to the source or context of external feedback and its relationship with feedback related negativity (FRN).

[Andrew @Andrew85078708]

#aoputc2020

[Andrew @Andrew85078708]

@ZoeLFrancis The Doors task was meant to resemble a source of external feedback that had varying levels of loss when cued with how many doors were winners before a participants door selection. -

[Andrew @Andrew85078708]

@ZoeLFrancis in relation to their SOP relationships due to past personal experiences (individual differences).

[Andrew @Andrew85078708]

@ZoeLFrancis These analyses revealed the inverse as those with higher Sop measures showed less sensitivity to external recognition of errors. The Doors task was modified to clearly inform the participant of the errors that were made. Real-world scenarios may amplify the results in amplitudes-

[Andrew @Andrew85078708]

@ZoeLFrancis The analyses revealed that measures of SOP were associated with lower FRN amplitudes (decrease amplitude). From the research I have conducted, higher measures of SOP would have less sensitivity to external feedback and increased sensitivity to internally recognized errors. -

[Andrew @Andrew85078708]

@noelyuenhh significance, the direction of the relationships predicted were correct (higher SOP with higher ERN amplitudes and higher SPP with higher FRN amplitudes). Analyses of the P300 and Pe would be components for future investigation that may help answer this question.

[Andrew @Andrew85078708]

@noelyuenhh individuals with higher SOP measures (larger negative FRN amplitudes associated with higher SOP scores). This may also indicate that those with higher SOP measures may be better able to adapt to negative external feedback. Although the other analyses did not reveal -

[Andrew @Andrew85078708]

@noelyuenhh The analyses revealed that measures of SOP significantly predicted FRN amplitudes. Higher SOP scores were associated with lower FRN amplitudes within the 2-Door cue trials. This may indicate that lower levels of negative external feedback would be associated with those -

[Andrew @Andrew85078708]

@TimMurp47049429 The larger P300 amplitude may be suppressing the FRN amplitude in the 3-Door task. Similar findings were also found between the ERN and Pe from the Flanker task. I’m excited to continue this research next term through graduate studies.

[Andrew @Andrew85078708]

@TimMurp47049429 The P300 would be the next component to investigate as it may be a factor in the reduced FRN amplitude in the 3-Door task (possible suppression). 1-Door cue trials and 2-door cue trials both had unexpected higher FRN amplitudes than the 3-Door cue trials.