New drop do not use if you do not understand how AI works and the work you must do on your side. If going hard make sure to use a burner account the MAC and IP spoofing though this went undetected for me for about a year on my account.
https://t.co/I7OFjfq8S1
#AI#Claude #Anthropic #Research #CyberSec
@grok .According to Anthropic's [Privacy Policy](https://t.co/tesaX8Cq2J), [Transparency Hub](https://t.co/9v9sqdQKMx), and disclosures highlighted in the [Foundation Model Transparency Index](https://t.co/3yzAOkcFiU), Anthropic strictly maintains that they do not sell user data to third parties. [1, 2]
However, they do share user data, prompts, and training information with a specific, legally defined list of partners, cloud providers, and government agencies to operate, safe-keep, and scale their models. The specific companies and entities Anthropic shares data with include: [3, 4]
## 1. Cloud Infrastructure & Compute Partners
Because Anthropic does not own its own data centers, any prompt you type into Claude is fundamentally processed and hosted on infrastructure owned by these massive cloud tech providers: [4]
* Amazon Web Services (AWS): Amazon is Anthropic's primary training and deployment partner. Data passed through Amazon Bedrock is processed on AWS infrastructure. [4, 5]
* Google Cloud (Google LLC): Google co-develops AI computing systems with Anthropic. Data passed through Google Vertex AI or standard consumer chats utilizes Google Cloud's GPU and TPU infrastructure. [4, 5]
## 2. Enterprise Model Distribution Providers [6]
If you use Claude through an enterprise multi-cloud framework, your interaction data flows directly through the network infrastructure of that provider: [5]
* Microsoft Azure: Anthropic routes and distributes API models to enterprise clients via Microsoft Azure AI Foundry. [5]
## 3. Safety, Security, and AI Testing Organizations
Anthropic shares redacted model data, cybersecurity findings, and vulnerability threat reports with outside security auditors and public safety agencies to run independent evaluations: [7]
* The UK AI Security Institute: Partnered for third-party safety and risk evaluations.
* US Center for AI Standards and Innovation (CAISI): Receives safety data to test deployment boundaries and safety compliance.
* The Frontier Model Forum (FMF): An industry body where Anthropic collaborates on security intelligence alongside Google, Microsoft, and OpenAI. [6, 7]
## 4. Legal, Regulatory, and Law Enforcement Entities
* According to Anthropic's disclosure policies, they will share user data with government regulators, courts, and law enforcement agencies globally if presented with a legally binding subpoena, warrant, or non-compliance mandate. [3]
## 5. Upstream Data Vendors (Model Training) [1]
While this is not your user data, the Foundation Model Transparency Index notes that Anthropic shares commercial financial data to purchase data from unnamed non-public third-party publishers, data-labeling firms, and web-scraping vendors to build the datasets used to train Claude.
------------------------------
If you want to look at how to stop Anthropic from using your personal chat logs internally, we can review the step-by-step navigation path to toggle off their 5-year training data retention setting. Would you like me to show you how to do that? [1]
[1] [https://t.co/8rVtcTfgCJ](https://t.co/fUK4LGVrLb)
[2] [https://t.co/1900upbyJg](https://t.co/3BjQtFKsEs)
[3] [https://t.co/dfGyM8ymSD](https://t.co/9J5h5D4Cci)
[4] [https://t.co/1900upbyJg](https://t.co/Q2JMV0yI7n)
[5] [https://t.co/8rVtcTfgCJ](https://t.co/9v9sqdQKMx)
[6] [https://t.co/6mraQUjX6Y](https://t.co/iPvnExW7tS)
[7] [https://t.co/8rVtcTfgCJ](https://t.co/RIwK9m3LK5)
@grok@chamuty@sickdotdev I apologize for the over statement @grok can you find all publicly available and research papers that list who Anthropic shares data with please and then post the full list here.
The clarification narrowly claims current researcher submissions aren't used to train generative AI. Their live product page still advertises AI agents powered by "12+ years of real-world vulnerability data" + prior H1 bounty findings. That data comes from researchers. If they deleted the original announcement post after backlash, it reinforces the perception of reactive spin over clear upfront transparency. The split-hair distinction doesn't fully resolve the consent and data-use concerns.
What a waste of time and money. Go get the real drug dealers. So cares about steroids. I could go to my local T clinic and they will just say low T even if not and give me a bioidentical testosterone script hell maybe even hgh if I ask nicely. On second thought maybe investigate all T clinics in Southlake TX π π€£ π πΉ